ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JRT · 23 August 2017, 05:10 AM

I don't have the both. But the one with 3-6-9 lume and a longer minute hand gets my vote.

sager · 23 August 2017, 05:31 AM

With lume.

faz · 23 August 2017, 05:35 AM

I went specifically for the WG version even though the newer model was out and I could source one at that time. I have a soft spot for the WG numerals and found it to be fancier and more dressed up..

I recommended the model to a good friend of mine as a first rolex, and he asked me which way he should go, and I said go with whatever you like best... he ended up getting the lume version. The lume 3/6/9 gives it a clean 'modern' look that I am also a fan of.

Since you already have one, if I were you, I would not lose money to change to the lume version.

23 August 2017, 05:35 AM	#33
faz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Faz Location: California Watch: like'em all Posts: 4,689	I went specifically for the WG version even though the newer model was out and I could source one at that time. I have a soft spot for the WG numerals and found it to be fancier and more dressed up.. I recommended the model to a good friend of mine as a first rolex, and he asked me which way he should go, and I said go with whatever you like best... he ended up getting the lume version. The lume 3/6/9 gives it a clean 'modern' look that I am also a fan of. Since you already have one, if I were you, I would not lose money to change to the lume version. __________________ -Faz Instagram @fazmoto

23 August 2017, 05:10 AM	#31
JRT "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Taiwan Watch: Rolex BLNR Posts: 2,308	I don't have the both. But the one with 3-6-9 lume and a longer minute hand gets my vote.

23 August 2017, 05:31 AM	#32
sager "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Sage Location: MENA Posts: 1,563	With lume.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)