ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 August 2017, 09:27 PM | #31 | ||
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,451
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
28 August 2017, 10:07 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
232 (not 233) has different movement and sold caseback. The profile of the case is even thinner than the 425. I bet there is a google image out there with that comparison. It results in the 232 wearing smaller!
__________________
member#3242 |
28 August 2017, 10:14 PM | #33 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,451
|
|
28 August 2017, 10:20 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
They are both great watches but I really think the 533 looks as good on you as the 232. But if its a personal question of comfort you must go for the one that feels best to you. An uncomfortable watch stays in the watch box.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
31 August 2017, 01:10 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,593
|
Great choices...get the one YOU like. Tough to go wrong!
|
Tags |
pam 425 , pam 533 , wristshot |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.