![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas tx
Watch: 16610,1675,16030
Posts: 1,136
|
GMT case back on a Sub?
I find myself wearing my 1675 GMT over my 16610 Sub more and more often due to the thinness of the watch. It's just more comfortable and lighter.
I was thinking, since a lot of that extra thickness is in the case back, has anyone ever replaced the case back in their Submariner with a GMT type? Would it even fit? I know it would compromise the depth rating, but the deepest I've ever had my Sub is around 100ft., so I think I would be good. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: MQ-24-7B2LLJF
Posts: 28,929
|
If it fits, I expect you'll be fine. The Tudor Ranger is thinner than the GMT-II with a totally flat caseback, and is rated to 150m compared to the the GMT-II's 100m.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,627
|
That's one of the main things that got me looking at GMT/Explorer IIs. The case back of my 16610 just never felt very comfortable on my arm. I considered swapping case backs, if possible, but I ended just going for an Explorer II, because I liked it anyways.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: MQ-24-7B2LLJF
Posts: 28,929
|
You already have a thread going on this subject, which even links to this thread. No need to have two on the go at once.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.