![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Michael
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 132
|
6.5"
__________________
Rolex BLNR "Batman" | AP RO 15400 | AP ROO 26470 "Elephant" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Ubi
Posts: 619
|
6.5” is not too small. My wrist was the same as yours and I have 44 mm’s. Since putting on some weight, my wrist got bigger and have started wearing 47 mm’s. I have a friend who’s wrist is smaller than yours. Guess what? He has both 44 mm (390) and a 47 mm (127 fiddy). For your information, PANERAI watches are supposed to be worn big. Getting a “small” PANERAI would be a, IMO, big mistake. This thread needs some pictures to convince you. My friends puny wrist on the left. I am wearing a 422. ![]() My 44 mm Panerai ![]() Even my wife is getting into bigger Panerai, seen here wearing my 24 with her red strap, she has a model 48 which is a 40 mm size. ![]() If you have a Rolex, a 44 mm PANERAI does not wear bigger than a BLNR or a Submariner, but it wears taller or thicker, depending on which term you prefer. Look,,, ![]() With the wife again but she wearing the Polar on our trip. ![]() In summary, to be getting into Panerai, my advice is to go big. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Michael
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 132
|
Thanks for the images.
Quote:
__________________
Rolex BLNR "Batman" | AP RO 15400 | AP ROO 26470 "Elephant" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.