|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2018, 01:09 AM
|
#91 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,634
|
After having had the SD4K for about 2 weeks, I have to say the SD43 puts a bigger smile on my face every time I put it on. There's just something that feels more special about it - while the SD4K was really only elevated (to me at least) by the fact it was a short run and is discontinued. However, it's definitely staying in the collection - I need that classic and timeless Rolex!
|
|
|
|
17 March 2018, 01:23 AM
|
#92 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 10
|
SD43 for sure. New movement!
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2018, 01:57 AM
|
#93 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Submarine
Posts: 171
|
If the sd43 had no cyclops it would be perfect
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2018, 05:08 AM
|
#94 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
For me, SubC Date > SD4K > SD43. And I have 7 3/4” wrists.
I like the cyclops. While the date in a dive watch is not critical, my watches do multiple duties. I don’t wear a dive watch just for diving. So for versatility I like the cyclops. Between the SubC and SD4K, the different dive ratings don’t matter to me any more. I used to be seduced by specs. That’s why I bought the DSSD originally. Didn’t like it on my wrist and traded it eventually for my 16710 BLRO.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
