ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 January 2018, 03:48 AM | #1 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
VERSUS: Submariner Date Siblings
Sixteenth edition of the "VERSUS" post/picture. What is "VERSUS"? Well, I thought it would be fun to compare two watches (and only those two watches) and discuss pros/cons by outlining the differences and getting folks' ideas/thoughts/opinions on TRF. We got folks here that have been collecting and studying these things for decades and those who are just starting to venture into the crazy world of Rolex (and everyone in between). Therefore, it would be fun and educational!
For this edition, we have a showdown of a couple Submariners with dates. A Submariner reference 1680 and a reference 16800. Which do you prefer and why? Previous VERSUS: 1. VERSUS: Submariner 1680 v. 16610 2. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner and Sea-Dweller 16610LV and 126600 3. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner 16610s 4. VERSUS: Sea (Deepsea 116660) to Sky (Explorer 1016) 5. VERSUS: Submariners Vintage and Modern 6. VERSUS: Datejusts with Unique Dials 7. VERSUS: Vintage Submariners 8. VERSUS: Vintage GMTs 9. VERSUS: 5-digit Sub and GMT 10. VERSUS: Special Edition Modern Sea-Dwellers 11. VERSUS: A Touch of Red (GMT-Master / Sea-Dweller) 12. VERSUS: Vintage Mk1 Sport Models (1675 and 1680) 13. VERSUS: Stainless Steel and Two-Tone Datejust 14. VERSUS: 1960s Dress and Sport 15. VERSUS: Semi-Modern GMTs
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
17 January 2018, 04:17 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
|
Because of the practicality of sapphire, I could maybe see going that direction if this was a matte dial 16800, but, in this case, 1680 all the way...actually, I'd still go 1680 in either case. The subtle differences make a difference, like the more compact bezel profile and whatnot.
|
17 January 2018, 04:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
|
My god that 1680 is glorious. The dial makes the difference for me here.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK |
17 January 2018, 05:22 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,186
|
That's a great 1680, all the way for me. Anything with white gold is not my cup of tea.
|
17 January 2018, 05:36 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 134
|
The 1680. The bezel is fabulous with the more pronounced indentions. The larger lume plots really pop. And I like the dial font for the Rolex logo and how it's closer to the center post. All in all looks much better.
|
17 January 2018, 06:06 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
What's the prize if we are correct?
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
17 January 2018, 06:36 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 234
|
larger plots on the 1680
__________________
Rolex 16753 Rootbeer GMT, 16803 Submariner Accutron Swiss Spaceview N3 Movado Astronic HS360 01.0010.436 Omega Flightmaster 145.036, 145.012 Speedmaster Enicar Sherpa Guide MKII |
17 January 2018, 07:23 AM | #8 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
You'll hate me for telling you that I found it at an antiques fair (fancy name for a flea market)...
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
|
17 January 2018, 07:30 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
That's a trick question as there is no correct answer John! :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
17 January 2018, 07:31 AM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
Yes, you'll some bezels have been polished heavily which leads to the "teeth" being soft/rounded down...but this bezel is nice and sharp, :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
17 January 2018, 08:31 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
Really...I didn't know. Then I'll go for the Sub.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
17 January 2018, 09:59 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
Cool thread!
I'm going to be checking out some of the "Previous VERSUS" threads. I'm here to learn Many thanks ! |
17 January 2018, 10:07 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
If it was matte I'd go 16800, but in this case 1680.
|
17 January 2018, 10:47 AM | #14 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
Be a sponge Jesus! SO MUCH to learn...part of the fun of this crazy hobby, :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
3 April 2018, 11:59 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
|
|
3 April 2018, 12:27 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 120
|
Can we get Versus photos comparing the side profiles which show off the unique top hat crystal of the 1680? This reason, along with those mentioned above, is why I chose the 1680 over any 16800.
|
7 April 2018, 01:54 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16800 Matte
Posts: 398
|
Well I made my choice with the matte dial 16800, it’s my one watch. The 1680s look fabulous but some 16800s have deeper patina which I prefer (I don’t know why this happens as 1680s are older). 16800s are also thinner and okay to swim with without much worry. The top hat acrylic has its own charm though :)
|
10 April 2018, 11:52 AM | #18 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808) |
|
11 April 2018, 03:52 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 836
|
Wow. No comparison for me. 1680 all the way!
__________________
Rolex Only Please |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.