The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 January 2018, 03:48 AM   #1
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
VERSUS: Submariner Date Siblings

Sixteenth edition of the "VERSUS" post/picture. What is "VERSUS"? Well, I thought it would be fun to compare two watches (and only those two watches) and discuss pros/cons by outlining the differences and getting folks' ideas/thoughts/opinions on TRF. We got folks here that have been collecting and studying these things for decades and those who are just starting to venture into the crazy world of Rolex (and everyone in between). Therefore, it would be fun and educational!

For this edition, we have a showdown of a couple Submariners with dates. A Submariner reference 1680 and a reference 16800.

Which do you prefer and why?








Previous VERSUS:
1. VERSUS: Submariner 1680 v. 16610
2. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner and Sea-Dweller 16610LV and 126600
3. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner 16610s
4. VERSUS: Sea (Deepsea 116660) to Sky (Explorer 1016)
5. VERSUS: Submariners Vintage and Modern
6. VERSUS: Datejusts with Unique Dials
7. VERSUS: Vintage Submariners
8. VERSUS: Vintage GMTs
9. VERSUS: 5-digit Sub and GMT
10. VERSUS: Special Edition Modern Sea-Dwellers
11. VERSUS: A Touch of Red (GMT-Master / Sea-Dweller)
12. VERSUS: Vintage Mk1 Sport Models (1675 and 1680)
13. VERSUS: Stainless Steel and Two-Tone Datejust
14. VERSUS: 1960s Dress and Sport
15. VERSUS: Semi-Modern GMTs
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 04:17 AM   #2
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Because of the practicality of sapphire, I could maybe see going that direction if this was a matte dial 16800, but, in this case, 1680 all the way...actually, I'd still go 1680 in either case. The subtle differences make a difference, like the more compact bezel profile and whatnot.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 04:26 AM   #3
Colin10101
"TRF" Member
 
Colin10101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Colin
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16710
Posts: 1,336
My god that 1680 is glorious. The dial makes the difference for me here.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE
Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea BLACK
Colin10101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 05:22 AM   #4
Tom1675
"TRF" Member
 
Tom1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,186
That's a great 1680, all the way for me. Anything with white gold is not my cup of tea.
Tom1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 05:36 AM   #5
cowboy music
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 134
The 1680. The bezel is fabulous with the more pronounced indentions. The larger lume plots really pop. And I like the dial font for the Rolex logo and how it's closer to the center post. All in all looks much better.
cowboy music is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 06:06 AM   #6
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
What's the prize if we are correct?
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 06:36 AM   #7
Cortezthekiller
"TRF" Member
 
Cortezthekiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 234
larger plots on the 1680
__________________
Rolex 16753 Rootbeer GMT, 16803 Submariner
Accutron Swiss Spaceview N3
Movado Astronic HS360 01.0010.436
Omega Flightmaster 145.036, 145.012 Speedmaster
Enicar Sherpa Guide MKII
Cortezthekiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 07:23 AM   #8
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin10101 View Post
My god that 1680 is glorious. The dial makes the difference for me here.
Why thank you! :)

You'll hate me for telling you that I found it at an antiques fair (fancy name for a flea market)...
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 07:30 AM   #9
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
What's the prize if we are correct?
That's a trick question as there is no correct answer John! :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 07:31 AM   #10
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboy music View Post
The 1680. The bezel is fabulous with the more pronounced indentions. The larger lume plots really pop. And I like the dial font for the Rolex logo and how it's closer to the center post. All in all looks much better.
Yes, you'll some bezels have been polished heavily which leads to the "teeth" being soft/rounded down...but this bezel is nice and sharp, :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 08:31 AM   #11
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
That's a trick question as there is no correct answer John! :)
Really...I didn't know. Then I'll go for the Sub.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 09:59 AM   #12
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Cool thread!

I'm going to be checking out some of the "Previous VERSUS" threads.

I'm here to learn

Many thanks !
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 10:07 AM   #13
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
If it was matte I'd go 16800, but in this case 1680.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2018, 10:47 AM   #14
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by schoolboy View Post
Cool thread!

I'm going to be checking out some of the "Previous VERSUS" threads.

I'm here to learn

Many thanks !
Be a sponge Jesus! SO MUCH to learn...part of the fun of this crazy hobby, :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 11:59 AM   #15
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
Be a sponge Jesus! SO MUCH to learn...part of the fun of this crazy hobby, :)


Thanks

The more I learn, the more I realize that there is more to learn !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2018, 12:27 PM   #16
pc109
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NY
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 120
Can we get Versus photos comparing the side profiles which show off the unique top hat crystal of the 1680? This reason, along with those mentioned above, is why I chose the 1680 over any 16800.
pc109 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2018, 01:54 PM   #17
blowfish89
"TRF" Member
 
blowfish89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 16800 Matte
Posts: 398
Well I made my choice with the matte dial 16800, it’s my one watch. The 1680s look fabulous but some 16800s have deeper patina which I prefer (I don’t know why this happens as 1680s are older). 16800s are also thinner and okay to swim with without much worry. The top hat acrylic has its own charm though :)
blowfish89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2018, 11:52 AM   #18
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by blowfish89 View Post
Well I made my choice with the matte dial 16800, it’s my one watch. The 1680s look fabulous but some 16800s have deeper patina which I prefer (I don’t know why this happens as 1680s are older). 16800s are also thinner and okay to swim with without much worry. The top hat acrylic has its own charm though :)
Fantastic example you got there!
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 April 2018, 03:52 AM   #19
Beckster
"TRF" Member
 
Beckster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 836
Wow. No comparison for me. 1680 all the way!
__________________
Rolex Only Please
Beckster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.