![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Trade 3 Stainless Sports Rolex for 1 Patek Nautilus White Dial? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 17.61% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
117 | 82.39% |
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,084
|
Quote:
I guess it comes down to if the OP really wants one... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
Winding the 5711 is like winding a watch full of grit / sand. It's horrible. It doesn't hack. But it looks nice....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
|
I might do it for a 5712 w/ blue dial, but not for a 5711 - it's just too plain for my tastes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Denny
Location: Texas
Watch: 126613LB
Posts: 1,192
|
nope, dont do it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
It seems like a good trade if you had paid retail for the Daytona, LV, the Sea Dweller Red and you are getting a BNIB 5711 white. However it would be expensive to replace the Daytona and the LV if you regret selling those. I have a 5711 and I find it fragile compared to my Daytona and LV.
I would wait for your AD to deliver a 5711 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,658
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
What about your son?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,465
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 992
|
Don’t do it.
Your 3 Rolexes are very nice, As much as the PP is an icon, it would not worth your 3 watches, and certainly not the one dedicated to your sun. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,176
|
I know Patek prices are off the charts like some Rolex but that doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Here and there
Posts: 579
|
That trade is really not worth IMO. Not even close.
I had a 5712 but it did not stay long. A lot of forum hype that makes you think you want one, but the reality was ‘meh’ never mind the price point. Sonia got traded out fairly quickly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: None
Posts: 646
|
Exactly this. The three you are suggesting trading are classic pieces. I wouldn't trade the two 50th anniversary references (Sub and SD) for the Patek.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,847
|
I'd say "No, don't trade" and "Yes, you're mad; it's a daft idea."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,286
|
$29,800 USD after recent price increase.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,176
|
No....and sacrifice what you said is for your son. No, and the white one at that. It's not even the hot sister.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,176
|
These are ridiculous compromises at this price. The blue is plain gorgeous but I can't get over how Patek makes the die hard wis techy overlook these ((imo) faults.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,827
|
I think it all depends on what you have in your collection. A 3:1 trade leaves a lot of opportunity for regret which I think is the hardest part. I let go of a few pieces when I bought my 5712 which was not easy to do. But I was very heavy in Rolex sport models and still have enough left in the collection that I don’t miss the ones I said goodbye to that much.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
|
I said 'yes', simply based on the total values of your current SS rolexes compared to a $45k+ price of a 5711 (google search).
However, I have not gained the maturity in WIS knowledge (yet) to appreciate Patek like others seem to do. Purely based on aesthetics and looks, I am still not a fan of Patek. In fact, when I go to the local AD that has Pateks as well as other brands, dollar for dollar I am more drawn to ALS offerings than Patek equivalents (in their dress watch). My wife likes the rose gold Aquanaut and perhaps someday we will get it for her, but I have seen it in the wild, worn by a neighbor's wife (as she was walking her dog as we chatted a bit) but even in person didn't look like a $35k+ watch to me (but that was the attraction for the neighbor's wife, an under the radar watch.) So would 'I' do it? No. Should you do it based on current pricing out there? seems to be a yes.
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,447
|
No way I’d would stand pat
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,465
|
Thank you Ken. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
And ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
No way. For a bunch of reasons, one of which is you bought the SD43 for your son. I’d stay put.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: .
Posts: 86
|
I would do it in a heartbeat
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,866
|
Daft idea? 3 S/S Rolex for 1 PP 5711 White?
My suggestion: don’t. I have traded 2 for one to get a PM Rolex and that did not last. Is one watch enough for you? I imagine you will be left with more than one, but it’s something to consider if that’s the case. If you are like me, one watch is not enough and once the shine wears off your eye will find another. Agree it’s a bubble and quite a bad time to chase that piece. Save the SD for your boy. Hold tight and save$. I did. Now I have several to choose from, including the PM I originally wanted.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,214
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Daft idea indeed my friend! No.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.