ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

S2000 Driver · 21 September 2007, 01:31 PM

What do you think?

Mrdi · 21 September 2007, 01:58 PM

Two please

alglez · 21 September 2007, 04:22 PM

to much diamonds!!! but it's a Patek :)

HDHNTER · 21 September 2007, 09:22 PM

Too much bling for me regardless of who makes it.

Stef_Call · 21 September 2007, 10:14 PM

Can you imagine the MRSP on that little lad !! Day, Date, chronograph with moon phase and a load of diamonds to boot !!!

Mort · 21 September 2007, 10:41 PM

Money no object, absolutly. I would prefer it in Rose of yellow gold. Still it is a stunning watch.

S2000 Driver · 21 September 2007, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stef_Call

Can you imagine the MRSP on that little lad !! Day, Date, chronograph with moon phase and a load of diamonds to boot !!!

MSRP is US$180,000.00.

Stef_Call · 21 September 2007, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S2000 Driver

US$180,000.00

Not one to wear while working on the car soooo

Paulie · 22 September 2007, 12:18 AM

What's with the plastic bezel protector on a photo model?

S2000 Driver · 22 September 2007, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paulie

What's with the plastic bezel protector on a photo model?

Wow, you're right -- all those diamonds around the bezel do look like a plastic bezel protector!

Perhaps I should put the PBP back on my 16610 Sub Date!

unknown · 22 September 2007, 03:59 AM

amazing watch

BUT

take the 5970 --> the same but without those sissy diamonds

S2000 Driver · 22 September 2007, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown

amazing watch

BUT

take the 5970 --> the same but without those sissy diamonds

But is the 5970 available with a platinum case and a black dial?

I can't seem to find any reference to one like that.

IMHO, that's what makes the 5971 so attractive.

Scooby · 22 September 2007, 10:24 AM

Maybe it's me, but I would expect a nicer finish and some style in a PP movement. This one looks pedestrtian (no blued screws, no fancy finish or scrolling on the balance cock, etc...) Maybe it's just the picture.

Nice watch though. Could do without the diamonds.

unknown · 22 September 2007, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S2000 Driver

But is the 5970 available with a platinum case and a black dial?

I can't seem to find any reference to one like that.

IMHO, that's what makes the 5971 so attractive.

correct, not available with black dial
and not in platinum

but a white gold or red gold are stunning

unknown · 22 September 2007, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooby

Maybe it's me, but I would expect a nicer finish and some style in a PP movement. This one looks pedestrtian (no blued screws, no fancy finish or scrolling on the balance cock, etc...) Maybe it's just the picture.

Nice watch though. Could do without the diamonds.

Patek's movements are top notch. The level of finishing is about the best you can get (I admit, the pic is not very good)

Top Swiss brands do not use blued screws, this is a German thing (Lange and Glashutte Original use those blue screws)

Patek never used blue screws (I think Breguet, AP, VC don't use them neither)

Scooby · 22 September 2007, 09:08 PM

Ah, I see. I wasn't questioning the movement itself, just that the finish looks a bit bland. Like I said, it could be the picture.

bankman33 · 23 September 2007, 07:24 AM

Patek Philippe the king of kings

daunwaun · 23 September 2007, 02:46 PM

very nice watch

stranger1 · 1 December 2008, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S2000 Driver

What do you think?

stunning watch, its available on ebay with min bid of $240k...what's the retail price for it, do you know?

topcat30093 · 6 December 2008, 04:07 PM

I would much rather have the 5970P if you could still get it. Not a fan of all the diamonds on it.
Not that I could afford it anyhow!!!

ballain · 7 December 2008, 12:26 AM

Absolutely Love it,

I am a big fan of diamond so, i would take it as pictured:)

21 September 2007, 01:31 PM	#1
S2000 Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: CT Watch: Submariner Datum ß Posts: 858	Patek Philippe 5971 Perpetual Calendar Chronograph What do you think? __________________

21 September 2007, 09:22 PM	#4
HDHNTER "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Allen Location: SC Posts: 2,766	Too much bling for me regardless of who makes it. __________________ Instagram @HDHNTER

22 September 2007, 12:18 AM	#9
Paulie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Chicagoland Watch: GMTII and OP! Posts: 1,272	What's with the plastic bezel protector on a photo model? __________________

23 September 2007, 02:46 PM	#18
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	very nice watch __________________ DAUNWAUN

6 December 2008, 04:07 PM	#20
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,460	I would much rather have the 5970P if you could still get it. Not a fan of all the diamonds on it. Not that I could afford it anyhow!!! __________________

21 September 2007, 01:58 PM	#2
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	Two please

21 September 2007, 04:22 PM	#3
alglez "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: houston Watch: TT blue sub Posts: 252	to much diamonds!!! but it's a Patek :)

21 September 2007, 10:14 PM	#5
Stef_Call Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Stefan Location: Dublin, Ireland Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc Posts: 470	Can you imagine the MRSP on that little lad !! Day, Date, chronograph with moon phase and a load of diamonds to boot !!!

21 September 2007, 10:41 PM	#6
Mort "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Atlanta GA Posts: 1,001	Money no object, absolutly. I would prefer it in Rose of yellow gold. Still it is a stunning watch.

22 September 2007, 03:59 AM	#11
unknown "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 2,907	amazing watch BUT take the 5970 --> the same but without those sissy diamonds

22 September 2007, 10:24 AM	#13
Scooby Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Darren Location: Virginia, USA Watch: GMT Posts: 923	Maybe it's me, but I would expect a nicer finish and some style in a PP movement. This one looks pedestrtian (no blued screws, no fancy finish or scrolling on the balance cock, etc...) Maybe it's just the picture. Nice watch though. Could do without the diamonds.

22 September 2007, 09:08 PM	#16
Scooby Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Darren Location: Virginia, USA Watch: GMT Posts: 923	Ah, I see. I wasn't questioning the movement itself, just that the finish looks a bit bland. Like I said, it could be the picture.

23 September 2007, 07:24 AM	#17
bankman33 Banned Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Chicago Posts: 47	Patek Philippe the king of kings

7 December 2008, 12:26 AM	#21
ballain "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NB, Canada Posts: 59	Absolutely Love it, I am a big fan of diamond so, i would take it as pictured:)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)