The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 January 2015, 03:17 PM   #1
jujin
"TRF" Member
 
jujin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 307
116600 all day comfort?

A lot has been said about the 116600 since its release and I've really taken a liking to its small profile. I used to have a GMT IIc but I never felt I had a good fit and often times the crown would slam the back of my hand/wrist if I swung my arm down too fast. The watch was perfectly centered but it was either too lose or too tight. I also thought it was too heavy but that may be because I never got that perfect fit. I have a 16710 which I'm happy with and it's very comfortable considering it weighs much less. I'm wondering if I can get a better fit with the sd4000 since it has a glidelock will it be comfortable to wear all day or will the weight still make the wrists sore.
jujin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 03:57 PM   #2
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Unfortunately, your question regarding comfort is not one that anyone can really answer...

Comfort is so very subjective...

Ask 10 different people, get 10 different answers...

It's really something that, and only through trial and error, you will have to determine for yourself...

As for myself, I find the 116600 to be the most comfortable Sea Dweller that I have ever worn...

Although I have never found any Sea Dweller too be uncomfortable, nor have I ever felt that a Sea Dweller is too big or too heavy for daly wear...

I have worn a Sea Dweller (1665, 16660, 16600) everyday (almost) for some 30 years and have never been anything but happy...

And yes, the NEW Bracelets do make it much easier to get the proper fit...No question...!!!

The 116600 is now my only watch and I could not the happier...!!!

That's probably not much help, but there you go...


Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 04:25 PM   #3
Karbo
"TRF" Member
 
Karbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
You sold your dayto clay ?
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo
Karbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 04:26 PM   #4
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
116600 is a very attractive 'do everything' proposition.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 04:59 PM   #5
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karbo View Post
You sold your dayto clay ?
Gone with the wind...
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 06:31 PM   #6
Mezz72
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 618
I removed 3 links and with the glide lock adjustments, can't see why anyone can't get a perfect and comfortable fit for themselves.
Mezz72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 07:48 PM   #7
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
116600 all day comfort?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezz72 View Post
I removed 3 links and with the glide lock adjustments, can't see why anyone can't get a perfect and comfortable fit for themselves.

I could be wrong but I think most people are referring to the additional thickness of the watch case over something like a SubC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 08:29 PM   #8
Nitedeuce
"TRF" Member
 
Nitedeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Watch: Rolex VC JLC IWC
Posts: 452
Quote:
Comfort is so very subjective...


Well said and couldn't be more true.

My 116600 is my daily wear and it is very comfortable for me. I use the fine adjustments on the clasp as needed and find it extremely convenient. I don't wear the 116600 with a suit. If I did choose to, I would make sure that all my shirts were tailored properly to fit it. I have other watches for suits and dress shirts. Try one and see how it feels!
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." - Ernest Hemingway
Nitedeuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 08:37 PM   #9
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,447
The glidelock clasp is a game changer.
I am yet to own a watch with it that didn't give the perfect fit.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 09:18 PM   #10
thewatchguy93
"TRF" Member
 
thewatchguy93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: thewatchguy
Location: UK
Watch: me buy gold..
Posts: 7,441
Couldnt have said it any better...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Clay View Post
Unfortunately, your question regarding comfort is not one that anyone can really answer...

Comfort is so very subjective...

Ask 10 different people, get 10 different answers...

It's really something that, and only through trial and error, you will have to determine for yourself...

As for myself, I find the 116600 to be the most comfortable Sea Dweller that I have ever worn...

Although I have never found any Sea Dweller too be uncomfortable, nor have I ever felt that a Sea Dweller is too big or too heavy for daly wear...

I have worn a Sea Dweller (1665, 16660, 16600) everyday (almost) for some 30 years and have never been anything but happy...

And yes, the NEW Bracelets do make it much easier to get the proper fit...No question...!!!

The 116600 is now my only watch and I could not the happier...!!!

That's probably not much help, but there you go...





Dino
__________________
Instagram.. @thewatchguy

www.thewatchguyofficial.co.uk

Got a GREEN Submariner 116610LV.. Visit the official thread here! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=179580

Don't forget to visit the Rolex & Attire thread too! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=215077
thewatchguy93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 09:22 PM   #11
winston
"TRF" Member
 
winston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Watch: All of them
Posts: 312
Very comfortable indeed even with the extension link in mine is as comfortable as any in my collection
__________________
==================================================
116506, 116508 Green, 116619, 116719, 116660, 126660 D-Blue, 126600, 126610LV, 226570 Polar, 116600, 116610LN, 116710LN, 116500 Panda, 16610LV, 16600, 16610, 16570 Polar, 16710 Pepsi.
winston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 09:28 PM   #12
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by jujin View Post
The watch was perfectly centered but it was either too lose or too tight.
Get a watch with glidelock clasp. Problem solved. If the GMT was heavy, the 114060 is a good option and the SD-C will be heavier.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 09:34 PM   #13
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I've yet to have any comfort issues with any of my Rolexes... and most of them are heavy PM. The glide lock is awesome.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2015, 10:23 PM   #14
Roger1079
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South FL
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by jujin View Post
A lot has been said about the 116600 since its release and I've really taken a liking to its small profile. I used to have a GMT IIc but I never felt I had a good fit and often times the crown would slam the back of my hand/wrist if I swung my arm down too fast. The watch was perfectly centered but it was either too lose or too tight. I also thought it was too heavy but that may be because I never got that perfect fit. I have a 16710 which I'm happy with and it's very comfortable considering it weighs much less. I'm wondering if I can get a better fit with the sd4000 since it has a glidelock will it be comfortable to wear all day or will the weight still make the wrists sore.
If you consider the 116710 to be too heavy, the 116600 will definitely be too heavy. With the solid end and center links, larger case features, and the addition of the glidelock, the weight of both the current 116610 and 116600 watches have increased in weight significantly compared to the previous models. When I bought my 116610LN I was amazed at how much lighter it was than my older Breitling Super Ocean, then I got my hands on an older 16600 Sea Dweller and the weight difference was unbelievable. It felt like it weighed next to nothing in comparison.

What I am getting at is, if you think the problem with comfort is not being able to get a precise fit, the glidelock on the Sea Dweller 4000 will allow you to fit the watch perfectly under just about any circumstance. All you will need to do is play with the links when you first get the watch to find the sweet spot where the clasp is centered on the bottom of your wrist and you have adjustment room in both directions on the clasp. However if the problem is the actual weight, none of the current sport models will work for you as they have all gotten heavier through the increase in size of case features and all the links in the bracelet and end links being solid.
Roger1079 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2015, 10:52 AM   #15
jujin
"TRF" Member
 
jujin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 307
Thank you guys you've all been very helpful. I realize comfort is subjective but I was just trying to get a average consensus. I realize it is heavier than the GMT IIc but I'm wondering if I thought it was uncomfortable because the fit was either too tight or too lose even with the easy link. If the glidelock is more precise and if I can attain a better fit I'm thinking it may be more comfortable...
jujin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2015, 11:07 AM   #16
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post
The glidelock clasp is a game changer.
I am yet to own a watch with it that didn't give the perfect fit.
Agree!
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2015, 08:52 AM   #17
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
I found that the SD 4000 felt just slightly bigger than the SD 16600. There was probably no major difference in reality and to be honest the 4000 sat slightly better on the wrist, but only with the dive link extension removed. I know a few other guys who did the same thing. The Glidelock bracelet is also very impressive! Very nice watch indeed!
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2015, 12:53 PM   #18
El Cascarrabias
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: USA
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post
The glidelock clasp is a game changer.
The first day I owned my SD 4000 I found it very uncomfortable. Funny how that doesn't seem to materialize at the AD. But, if it had, I may have missed owning a great watch.

Thankfully, after playing with the Glide Lock a bit I found the watch to be very comfortable.

Now, it's just not an issue.
El Cascarrabias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2015, 01:38 PM   #19
fishingbear
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,548
My SD4000 has been super comfy since day one and all I did was simply removed the diver extension and adjusted the Glidelock. It is the first watch I have bought sight unseen without even trying one on nor seeing one in person and I could not be happier.
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2015, 02:05 PM   #20
Afghanvet
"TRF" Member
 
Afghanvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
Not a SD owner, but have a subC... very comfy!
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous

Afghanvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 March 2015, 02:11 PM   #21
toneafficianado
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
toneafficianado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by busytimmy View Post
116600 is a very attractive 'do everything' proposition.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agree!
toneafficianado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2018, 12:44 AM   #22
chief514
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: dubai
Posts: 2
Just bought the sd4k and had the same issue. I didn’t understand why since prior, I wore a watch that was heavier but felt more comfortable. Found out with trials and errors that the more links you take out the more uneven the weight. When ajusting the gridlock, if u see more than 4 “holes” then I believe you took out too many links and should add one. When WIS say top heavy, it’s more related to the bracelet being to light than the actual case (unless the watch weighs 300g or u have a 5” wrist :)
chief514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 09:27 AM   #23
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Mine is very comfortable... All day everyday.
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 11:31 AM   #24
1Second
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Pete
Location: Virginia
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 18
Count me as another big fan of the Glidelock clasp. It allows me to make fine adjustments on the fly to my SD4K. I actually use it almost on a daily basis. I’m sort of a gym rat. So, after a good workout at the gym, my wrist always swells a little from all the physical activity (lifting weights). So, I always need to extend the Glidelock by one click after a workout. Then, a few hours later when my body has cooled down (and my wrist shrinks back to its normal size), I’ll move/tighten the Glidelock to its original position. So, the Glidelock clasp always allows me to get the perfect, most comfortable fit under all conditions.

I don’t own another Rolex with one of those Easylink type clasps... at least not yet. However, based on my wrist size/type and lifestyle, I suspect that even on a lighter watch with an Easylink clasp (like a GMT II), it probably would not be as comfortable as a heavier watch that is fitted with a Glidelock clasp. As a further note, like many other owners, I also had the diver extension removed on my SD4K.

So, my vote is to go with the SD4K! Based on all the feedback from various owners with different wrist sizes & types, I think there is an extremely high probability that you’ll be able to dial in a perfect & comfortable fit with this watch.

Good luck!!
1Second is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 12:30 PM   #25
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,674
No problem for me wearing the SD4K all day. I just love the watch. No problem with my small 6.5 inch wrist either. I'm also enjoying it on the Everest rubber strap. Funny to see this thread brought up after 3.5 years.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 03:26 PM   #26
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,440
116600 is always awesomely comfortable to me.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 03:39 PM   #27
JasChCh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 199
I can't imagine any Rolex with a Glidelock clasp being anything other than very comfortable.

The Deep Sea 126660 is my newest watch and has become my daily due to it's comfort & I am sure a very large part of that comfort is the Glidelock. My other watches just don't sit as perfectly now.
JasChCh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 07:01 PM   #28
Ste_J
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Ste
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 380
Sold my SD4000 for a gmt2c. Could not get a comfy fit due to the bulbous case back - same goes for all Rolex divers really. The GMT has a flatter case back profile and sits closer to the wrist so less flopping about.

The biggest improvement Rolex could make to its sports range would be flatten the back and curve the lugs slightly. Like the yachtmaster case profile.
Ste_J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2018, 06:04 AM   #29
R!$
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
My platinum daytona weighs three times a steel watch and I wear it daily with no issues
R!$ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.