The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watch Reviews (Non-Rolex)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 December 2008, 04:40 PM   #1
archie42
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
Patek Philippe Calatrava 3944

Patek Philippe Calatrava 3944



Hello all Patek lovers.



I have just bought myself a classic Patek. It is the classic gents Calatrava in 18K yellow gold. It has the classic black strap with the 18K Patek buckle. It has the hobnail bezel. A classic white enamel dial with Romans, a date at 3 and a second’s hand. This is truly a classic Patek.



But wait….. There is 1 major flaw.

IT IS QUARTZ.



Yes – I just bought a quartz Patek Philippe Calatrava. Reference 3944.



Did I make a serious mistake? I think not.



Patek Philippe lives in the commercial world. In the early 90s a major luxury brand like Patek needed a quartz solution for retiring businessmen…. For yuppies on the rise. These are people who had gotten used to the ultra precision of their Omega Constellation 2 tone in quartz. Patek filled this niche easily with the 3944. At the time it was similar in pricing to the mechanical 3919.



You might think anyone who bought a quartz Patek is a fool. However in the 90s it was not quite that clear. The quartz was presented as the evolution of the modern age with one of the best quartz movements ever made. See the old advertisements for the 3944 and it was sold as the way of the future BUT with the tradition of the past.



Patek is not a new comer to quartz. NO – Patek was one of the founding fathers of the quartz invention. Infact Patek quartz was so technologically advanced Patek had a big market for ships chronometers. YES – many an ocean liner, super tanker from the 70s/80s/90s will have a Patek Quartz Ships Chronometer.



To describe this phenomenon it is similar today how the market is for oversize watches. But you say Patek would never do this… But Patek just killed the 3919 33mm watch in favor of the 5119 which is essential the same watch but with a clumsy 36mm watch case.



BUT hang on….. Isn’t it foolish to make a watch larger than necessary? I thought old watch making class was to make the watch as thin/small as possible. BUT Patek lives in the commercial world. So they killed the 3919 …… add 3mm and called it the 5119.



In 10 years time will people say the 36mm watch is rubbish?

Will collectors crave the 33mm 3919?

I have no idea. However I don’t think it really matters as it is still a Patek. Just like my 3944 is a Patek.



Because I bought a quartz unloved Patek model I got a substantial discount. I paid US$3800- for this watch with Patek box. If I bought a 3919 on the used market I would pay twice that price.



So buying the 3944 Calatrava I already got a huge discount. Is it really a watch without soul? I think not. It is a known fact that sex is 90% in the head and 10% physical. Perhaps you should reread those 90s adverts and regain the passion for the 3944 quartz model.



The 3944 has the potential to become wanted in the futre. I seem to remember that the Rolex Explorer 1 was not really a loved model! Even the Milgause was looked down upon. Does this mean the Patek 3944 will become the next Plastic Red Seadweller? I have no idea nor do I care.



I have a bargain Calatrava on my wrist and I am not going to think it is rubbish because somebody on a watch forum thinks I am a fool.

archie42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2008, 04:47 PM   #2
archie42
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
I have since sold this watch and purchased a Rolex DateJust 16233 with Factory Diamond dial..... I made only $100- on this deal (so no large profit....)....

At the end of the day I could not get my head around a quartz patek.... also scraced if the movement played up and need a $$$$ patek only repair....
archie42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2008, 05:22 PM   #3
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Hey Archie,

You do realise, of course, that you've been talking to yourself......until I took pity on you and decided to give you some company?

PS: That is a beautiful dress watch. Love the hobnail bezel!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2008, 07:00 PM   #4
asadtiger
"TRF" Member
 
asadtiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
that is a very beautiful watch with a great name to go for it
asadtiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2008, 12:15 AM   #5
redshirt1957
"TRF" Member
 
redshirt1957's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Hey Archie,

You do realise, of course, that you've been talking to yourself......until I took pity on you and decided to give you some company?


PS: That is a beautiful dress watch. Love the hobnail bezel!

Archie only talks to himself. Me? I also listen and answer to myself.
redshirt1957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2008, 04:11 AM   #6
GMTJOHNNY
"TRF" Member
 
GMTJOHNNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: LONG ISLAND, NY
Watch: 2007 DAY DATE 18KT
Posts: 1,378
...some voices in my head told me to join in...How come Patek does not have any COSC certified chronometers? I saw they did not apply for any certificates and Rolex applies for 780,000+ certificates per year.
Are Pateks as accurate as Rolex or is it "good enough"? For their price I would think they would be well within the +4-6 rule.
Thoughts?
__________________
ROLEX DAY DATE 118238 (2007)
ROLEX DAY DATE 18238 (1997)
ROLEX GMT 16750 PEPSI (1987)
ROLEX AIR KING 14000 (1991)
ROLEX GMTIIC TT 116713LN (2008)
GMTJOHNNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2008, 04:28 AM   #7
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by archie42 View Post

I have just bought myself a classic Patek.

Did I make a serious mistake? I think not.

Is it really a watch without soul? I think not. It is a known fact that sex is 90% in the head and 10% physical. Perhaps you should reread those 90s adverts and regain the passion for the 3944 quartz model.
Quote:
Originally Posted by archie42 View Post
I have since sold this watch and purchased a Rolex DateJust

At the end of the day I could not get my head around a quartz patek.... also scraced if the movement played up and need a $$$$ patek only repair....
I'm sorry...but I really don't understand this post or your thinking? Both of these posts were written on the same day! It's almost like there are two different people writing...in less than 24 hours you go from stating your love for this watch & rambling on & on about its merits to turning around and reporting how it's been sold because essentially you didn't like it & couldn't 'get your head around a quartz patek'??? Sorry, am I missing something here?
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2008, 05:08 AM   #8
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
It only took 5 minutes to decide to sell.

JJ you have a new rival.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 December 2008, 07:00 AM   #9
archie42
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 96
I posted this article on a Patek site quite some time again.... I spent hours writing it and I own the copywrite to it.... so I thought I would share that article with my friends here.....

As I follow up I wanted to reveal I have however already sold the watch.......
BOUGHT PATEK 3944 early October.... Sold Early November....

Enjoyed Patek for 1 month!
archie42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.