ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 January 2019, 02:01 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesse
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 116234, 116613LB
Posts: 1,855
|
Calling technical WIS/Watchmakers: Milgauss
Hello WISers and Watchmakers,
Greetings from the long white cloud Aotearoa aka New Zealand. Question: Not that it will happen, but IF a date window will be in Milgauss will it affect its capability to withstand the 1,000 gauss magnetism? Considering magnetic fields can pass trough with or without holes? Your scientific and physics and watchmaking technical answers shall be appreciated and added to my unused arsenal of WISdomestication. Photo from rolex.com Cheers |
9 January 2019, 02:18 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,671
|
Probably would destroy the Faraday cage.
|
9 January 2019, 02:35 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,202
|
Depends - with existing movement perhaps. However, if fitted with Syloxi hairspring, likely not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 January 2019, 02:38 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM
Posts: 1,262
|
If the Omega Aqua Terra has a date window and is capable of withstanding 15000 gauss don't see why Rolex can't upgrade the Milgauss with a datewheel
|
9 January 2019, 02:39 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
I would 100% buy the milgauss if it had a date on it.
|
9 January 2019, 02:47 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesse
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 116234, 116613LB
Posts: 1,855
|
Hah!
Here's a nugget of WISdom I trawled: There is no date on the Rolex Milgauss since any cutout on the dial would likely interfere with the operation of the Faraday cage. https://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-m...-watch-review/ Keep your tech answers coming. Cheers Sent from my TRT-LX2 using Tapatalk |
12 January 2019, 03:33 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Paul B.
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16710 "Coke"
Posts: 112
|
Physicist checking in. It's not technically a Faraday cage that protects the movement - a Faraday cage is the mesh-like grid that your microwave oven has to prevent the electromagnetic waves from extending behind the cooking volume.
The Milgauss uses the "old school" method of magnetically shielding the movement using a highly magnetically permeable inner case. This can be made from iron or Mu-metal which is an alloy of nickel and iron. I've played around with designs for a super-magnetically resistant watch and using a ballpark of 60 gauss max on the balance spring I was able to get ~1500 gauss resistance fairly easily. However, make a hole such as for a date window and you can halve this number depending on where you put the date relative to the balance. The modern Milgauss has the Parachrom balance spring which can probably handle a couple of hundred gauss or more at a guess without being affected - its niobium zirconium alloy is weakly paramagnetic hence the name. An interesting test recently on Hodinkee showed that the Milgauss handled ~4500 gauss with no ill effects which fits this hypothesis. But a date window would reduce this significantly despite being small compared to the size of the watch. The Syloxi spring would be even better as the diamagnetic silicon would not react to even large magnetic fields. Indeed, this is how Omega have achieved huge magnetic resistance over 15000 gauss. Their movement uses totally non-magnetic materials throughout so it needs no external shielding at all. This allows not only a date window but a full display back! Hope this answers your questions! |
12 January 2019, 04:08 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesse
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 116234, 116613LB
Posts: 1,855
|
Hey Paulbrl,
I am in awe of your your reply. Terrific! Interestingly, Aqua Terra has a higher capability of anti-magneticism than what Milgauss is claiming and yet has a date window. Thanks for weighing in! Cheers Sent from my TRT-LX2 using Tapatalk |
12 January 2019, 04:10 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesse
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 116234, 116613LB
Posts: 1,855
|
|
12 January 2019, 04:27 PM | #10 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,629
|
Omega's movement is entirely made from non magnetic materials, thus achieving a high resistance without a cage.
|
12 January 2019, 04:29 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,498
|
Great info Paul.
__________________
E |
12 January 2019, 04:42 PM | #12 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,629
|
|
12 January 2019, 04:46 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Jesse
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 116234, 116613LB
Posts: 1,855
|
|
12 January 2019, 04:58 PM | #14 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,629
|
No idea what the hole for the date would do in terms of magnetic resistance, it will look rather odd though, having the date deep underneath the shield.
|
12 January 2019, 11:55 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
|
Half the appeal to me is it not having a date window. I always considered the antimagnetic feature little more than a marketing gimmick anyhow.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.