ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Xelorpepsi · 10 March 2019, 10:49 AM

Yes for a 5712 paid retail price, but not for a 5167A.

Based on the current market in London, you would need to add another 7-10k to purchase a 5167A on the grey market. Don't think that's worth it not to mention that the watch is not that versatile.

HorologyK · 10 March 2019, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soundserious

Patek isn’t for everyone lad.

Whatever. Sold them both for more than I paid. Sucker born every minute.

superdog · 10 March 2019, 12:04 PM

[QUOTE=Xelorpepsi;9421507]Yes for a 5712 paid retail price, but not for a 5167A.

Based on the current market in London, you would need to add another 7-10k to purchase a 5167A on the grey market. Don't think that's worth it not to mention that the watch is

Duplicate

superdog · 10 March 2019, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xelorpepsi

Yes for a 5712 paid retail price, but not for a 5167A.

Based on the current market in London, you would need to add another 7-10k to purchase a 5167A on the grey market. Don't think that's worth it not to mention that the watch is not that versatile.

Agree

Watcheroo · 10 March 2019, 05:51 PM

I wouldn't do it.

Jack Cassidy · 11 March 2019, 09:07 AM

No way for a 5167A. Both Rolexes are great classics with modern edge in each their own way - and with much more wrist presence than the Aqua.

The Aqua is stealth and underwhelming and wears very thinly on the wrist. It is also very vulnerable to scratches. If it didn't say Patek on the dial, I doubt many people would be in awe of this pseudo-sports watch.

ppalasthira · 11 March 2019, 02:13 PM

No. Never.

Justindo · 13 March 2019, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

Not a chance if it were me. I prefer both of your current watches over the 5167.

This. I'd personally rather have even one of your Rolexes over the Aquanaut.

AckAck · 13 March 2019, 12:48 PM

Absolutely not for an Aquanat.

10 March 2019, 12:04 PM	#93
superdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Seth Location: nj Watch: Omega Posts: 24,868	[QUOTE=Xelorpepsi;9421507]Yes for a 5712 paid retail price, but not for a 5167A. Based on the current market in London, you would need to add another 7-10k to purchase a 5167A on the grey market. Don't think that's worth it not to mention that the watch is Duplicate __________________ If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff)

10 March 2019, 10:49 AM	#91
Xelorpepsi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: UK Posts: 310	Yes for a 5712 paid retail price, but not for a 5167A. Based on the current market in London, you would need to add another 7-10k to purchase a 5167A on the grey market. Don't think that's worth it not to mention that the watch is not that versatile.

10 March 2019, 05:51 PM	#95
Watcheroo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Posts: 3,928	I wouldn't do it.

11 March 2019, 09:07 AM	#96
Jack Cassidy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Oz Watch: Rolex & Patek Posts: 291	No way for a 5167A. Both Rolexes are great classics with modern edge in each their own way - and with much more wrist presence than the Aqua. The Aqua is stealth and underwhelming and wears very thinly on the wrist. It is also very vulnerable to scratches. If it didn't say Patek on the dial, I doubt many people would be in awe of this pseudo-sports watch.

11 March 2019, 02:13 PM	#97
ppalasthira Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: ASK Watch: SubC.5711.D500 Posts: 2,236	No. Never.

13 March 2019, 12:48 PM	#99
AckAck "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: US Watch: Patek 5204P Posts: 485	Absolutely not for an Aquanat.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)