The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 June 2019, 03:55 AM   #1
wiswrist
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wiswrist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,086
Production Version of the RO RD#2 PC Ultra-Thin







Movement
Self-winding Calibre 5513; perpetual calendar with day, date, astronomical moon, month, leap year, hours and minutes; 40-hour power reserve

Case
42mm titanium with platinum bezel; water resistant to 20m

Strap
Titanium bracelet with platinum links and titanium AP folding clasp

Source: Link
__________________
@wiswrist
wiswrist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 04:38 AM   #2
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
I wish it were a little busier, then it would be awesome.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 05:37 AM   #3
eal15
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Everett
Location: GTA, Canada
Watch: Audemars Piguet 15
Posts: 789
Other than being so thin, which I appreciate, is want this thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
eal15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 07:55 AM   #4
APAP
"TRF" Member
 
APAP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
I like the larger sub dials but not a big fan of the plain dial. Plus 42 is quite large. Moon phase on top is a nice touch.
APAP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 11:14 AM   #5
epic
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 165
Saw the Specs on AP site and its stated as 41mm like size of the current 26574 PC.

However I prefer the prototype with the blue Grande Tapisserie which projects a more classic and sporty look.

Nevertheless an achievement for AP on the thinness of this movement.

Cheers
epic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 01:47 PM   #6
gsg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
I like this one better with the flat dial, looks very clean. However the diameter is too large for my liking, I wish it was 39mm or 40mm.
gsg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 07:50 PM   #7
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,919
And the platinum bezel is mirror polished like many other RO Pt bezels?
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 07:59 PM   #8
GMN2030
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London
Posts: 6
I have noticed the display for the leap year sub dial is anti-clockwise. Is there a technical explanation ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GMN2030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 09:56 PM   #9
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,919
Yes, it is mirror polished... first arrival by horoloupe...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 12.jpg (181.1 KB, 396 views)
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 11:26 PM   #10
Soly20
2024 Pledge Member
 
Soly20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
That looks good!
Soly20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2019, 11:30 PM   #11
Mbbgysam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,065
Wow - I think the real life photo looks better than the stock photos!

Does anyone know the purpose of the screws in the back of each link? I don't recall ever seeing that before on a RO bracelet. Perhaps it allows a watchmaker to fully dismantle during service to achieve different polishes on the titanium vs. platinum?
Mbbgysam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 12:01 AM   #12
HK Islandboy
"TRF" Member
 
HK Islandboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
I must admit that I prefer the current 41mm QP. I’m really not a fan of the mirror polish on the bezel
HK Islandboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 01:52 AM   #13
T3F
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
Honestly...I don't like it. The dial is pretty bland, and the layout isn't as nice as on the regular PC.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral
T3F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 02:03 AM   #14
tcheeco
"TRF" Member
 
tcheeco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: EU
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 1,274
Saw it on IG, very very nice indeed
https://www.instagram.com/p/ByXRvSlg...=1h7686rltq5v7
tcheeco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 02:08 AM   #15
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by HK Islandboy View Post
I must admit that I prefer the current 41mm QP. I’m really not a fan of the mirror polish on the bezel
Agree... one of the best design elements of RO is how verical polished bezel top works with mirror polished sides, and with all mirror polish you lose that magic.
edo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 02:14 AM   #16
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,399
Impressive? Absolutely. 42mm however..... its massive for being so thin.
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 03:14 AM   #17
CoveWatch
"TRF" Member
 
CoveWatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 4,535
It's a good looking watch to me
CoveWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 03:44 AM   #18
gsg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcheeco View Post
Saw it on IG, very very nice indeed
https://www.instagram.com/p/ByXRvSlg...=1h7686rltq5v7
Wow, beautiful! The first scratch to that bezel is going to HURT ;)

From the case back shot it seems that the movement would have easily allowed for a smaller diameter case. Hopefully we see smaller diameters in other versions down the road... (wishful thinking, I know).
gsg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 05:38 AM   #19
JCC296
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Posts: 877
Big AP fan here, but I have to say Patek 5740 > AP 26586IP in this PC battle.
JCC296 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 05:46 AM   #20
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
I like it!

So it’s not a limited edition?
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 06:01 AM   #21
kingofthehill
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: World
Posts: 488
What level is the piece priced at, please?
kingofthehill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 06:13 AM   #22
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
It’s not a limited edition by the looks of it.

The AP website confirms that it’s a 41mm

https://www.audemarspiguet.com/en/wa....01/#!/welcome

I think the guys wrist on the IG photos makes it look larger than it is.
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 06:24 AM   #23
Sir Larry Wildman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Lawrence
Location: London, England
Watch: Rolex, PP, JLC
Posts: 561
I really like the looks of it!

I agree it's impressive they got it so thin. However, if I think my 15202 is thin with a kinda-sorta delicate movement, I'm not sure what I would think of this...
Sir Larry Wildman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2019, 07:46 AM   #24
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcheeco View Post
Saw it on IG, very very nice indeed
https://www.instagram.com/p/ByXRvSlg...=1h7686rltq5v7


Absolutely stunning finishing.

I wonder if the turned dial would be too thick for it
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 08:08 PM   #25
zly512
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: London
Posts: 77
hmmmm. Interesting. I can see that AP is trying to separate it from the current PC collection by giving it a non tapisserie dial. Not sure if I like it.
zly512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 12:59 AM   #26
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
I think not having the tapisserie dial adds to the clean look and legibility.

Im glad AP trying to do different things.
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 01:24 AM   #27
msm2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: London
Posts: 66
Good comparison in this pic:

https://www.instagram.com/p/ByfH_TAARYM/

Personally I like it. Something different yet still familiar.
msm2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 01:36 AM   #28
neogump
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: China
Posts: 62
I like left one... do not understand why production version uses satin finish dial. From picture I don't think it makes more legible, maybe pairs mirror bezel polish better.

通过我的 Mate RS 上的 Tapatalk发言
neogump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 02:50 AM   #29
ragsk
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
I actually prefer the 2019. Plus that pic is a poor representation of the dial. Look at the instagram pic by Horoloupe - much nicer in reality.
ragsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 03:14 AM   #30
johnnydrama
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dallas
Watch: 116520
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcheeco View Post
Saw it on IG, very very nice indeed
https://www.instagram.com/p/ByXRvSlg...=1h7686rltq5v7
That thing is a beauty on the wrist!
johnnydrama is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
audemars piguet , rd#2 , rd2 , royal oak


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.