The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 June 2019, 09:31 AM   #1
GMT2BATMAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: texas
Posts: 84
Wearability Daytona vs Sub?

I am patiently waiting for a Daytona. I don't want anything that wears larger than my sub. Can anyone comment on what wears larger between the two. Is one more comfortable than the other? Yes, i am aware they are both 40mm but other factors come in to play. Comments on the oyster flex and SS models would be appreciated.
GMT2BATMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:35 AM   #2
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,499
The Daytona is a slightly thinner and smaller watch than the Sub, It also doesn't have the cumbersome large clasp of the Subs.

Daytona is a comfortable, every-day watch, if you can get past the visibility issues with them.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:36 AM   #3
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
The Daytona wears very small. You have no worries that it will wear larger than your Sub.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:37 AM   #4
GMT2BATMAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: texas
Posts: 84
Thank you guys!
GMT2BATMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:39 AM   #5
42itus
"TRF" Member
 
42itus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
I have 6.5" wrists and the Daytona fits me better. I find it more comfortable. Like others have said, it wears smaller than a Sub. Good luck!
42itus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:45 AM   #6
richard371
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: sf
Watch: 116500LN White
Posts: 1,853
I’ve had many subs and Daytona’s. I have a 6.5” wrist and prefer the thinness and thinner lugs of the Daytona. Actually I prefer the 16610 over the 116610 if I had to wear a sub. Those fat lugs just don’t do it for me. I feel Rolex will phase them out eventually. Seems like they did with the new SD.
richard371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:50 AM   #7
Crazy Lugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
Current Daytona wears noticeably lower profile than a six digit sub, but not too much smaller in diameter, if at all. Feels just right on my 7-1/4" wrist.
Crazy Lugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:53 AM   #8
GMT2BATMAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: texas
Posts: 84
I have a 6.25 inch flat wrist. I think the sub and Batman on me are as big as I should go. My wife thinks I wear small watches and the sales associates have tried to convince me to buy a skydweller and explorer ii but I dont like the way they look or feel. I am hopeful I will come up on the list soon for an SS daytona. The sales associate and I talk on the phone once a week and he asked me if I would take a black one if they got it. Hope that means I am coming up. Otherwise, I am buying the white gold daytona on the oysterflex strap.
GMT2BATMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 09:53 AM   #9
s.m.b.
"TRF" Member
 
s.m.b.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: the Far West
Posts: 1,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard371 View Post
I’ve had many subs and Daytona’s. I have a 6.5” wrist and prefer the thinness and thinner lugs of the Daytona. Actually I prefer the 16610 over the 116610 if I had to wear a sub. Those fat lugs just don’t do it for me. I feel Rolex will phase them out eventually. Seems like they did with the new SD.
Yet, they didn't with the GMT, so who knows.
__________________
Rolex & Patek Philippe
s.m.b. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 10:25 AM   #10
steve099
"TRF" Member
 
steve099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Steve
Location: Australia
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 564
I have pretty small wrist size and wear a sub daily, its much easier to read then most of my other watches and that is important to me.

Although I dont own a daytona, I have tried them on from time to time and always found them a bit small for my liking.
steve099 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 10:30 AM   #11
GMT2BATMAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: texas
Posts: 84
Thanks for your thoughts!
GMT2BATMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 10:34 AM   #12
Thanos
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Toronto
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMT2BATMAN View Post
I am patiently waiting for a Daytona. I don't want anything that wears larger than my sub. Can anyone comment on what wears larger between the two. Is one more comfortable than the other? Yes, i am aware they are both 40mm but other factors come in to play. Comments on the oyster flex and SS models would be appreciated.

Daytona shockingly 'petite' compared to a submariner as many don't know that the Daytona is 38.5mm and not the advertised 40.

As tools said above. Tough to read. Essentially a bracelet that's a watch to be blunt.
Thanos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 10:39 AM   #13
Bearxj86
"TRF" Member
 
Bearxj86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,889
The Daytona is more comfortable than the modern Sub for my 6.75 inch wrist. I do prefer the wrist feeling of a non-maxi case Sub. That said, the glidelock really is king here for adjustability.

Daytona > Sub and I think Maxi case and normal case are tied due to glidelock. If you put a glidelock on a 16610 I think that would be the most comfortable.
Bearxj86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 11:10 AM   #14
Geaux Tigers
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Watch: SS Sub Date
Posts: 439
I wear both and Dayton wears a lot smaller than sub. I wear the SS Daytona C so can’t speak to the oyster flex. I like both the sub c and Daytona for different reasons. Enjoy!
Geaux Tigers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 11:15 AM   #15
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Daytona wears much smaller than a sub (116610) and actually measures smaller than 40mm.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 11:19 AM   #16
sherrill
"TRF" Member
 
sherrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 251
Daytona wears smaller than a 6 digit sub, but not a 5 digit sub. I had a Daytona for a little while till I decided that it not having a date was an issue and sold it, got a DayDate 40 instead.
sherrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 12:06 PM   #17
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,524
The Daytona is the best watch on the planet
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 12:14 PM   #18
Muxi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
The Daytona wears very comfortable, much better than Sub or Sea-Dweller. Explorer 1 wears more comfortable than Daytona.
Muxi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 12:23 PM   #19
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,571
The fit of the modern Daytona is magnificent.

The fit of the submariner is a bit clumsy by comparison.

Sold my Daytona still have my sub.
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 12:33 PM   #20
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,894
Here are my two, they’re small watches compared to others I have. I’d use the word “delicate” when describing them in comparison to the professional series. The Daytona is such an awe inspiring watch to look at. I don’t honestly think any other Rolex comes remotely close. Compared to my smurf, exp II 42, SD43 etc, the Daytona just oozes class and refinement. Less utilitarian I guess.





__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 01:58 PM   #21
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
Daytona spoiled it for me. My SubC feels very bulky and uncomfortable now. Of course, I still enjoy wearing it but Daytona just feels so right on my 6.5" wrist.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 02:17 PM   #22
SS Oyster
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,202
Wearability Daytona vs Sub?

Daytona will seem small compared to the Sub, but it is lovely albeit hard to read from a legibility perspective. From a “I got one and hardly else does”, that signal is loud and clear!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 02:25 PM   #23
GMT2BATMAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: texas
Posts: 84
Beautiful!
GMT2BATMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 02:36 PM   #24
donaldizuru
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Earth
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
The Daytona is a slightly thinner and smaller watch than the Sub, It also doesn't have the cumbersome large clasp of the Subs.

Daytona is a comfortable, every-day watch, if you can get past the visibility issues with them.
this
donaldizuru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 02:46 PM   #25
yOyOYoo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 618
My WG Daytona on OF is so much more comfortable to wear on the wrist compared to my SubC. The Daytona is smaller, thinner, shorter (lug to lug) and has a much smaller clasp. The Daytona slides underneath my shirt cuff easily. I find the oysterflex strap to fit very nicely due to the wings under the strap that stabilize / center the Daytona on my wrist. I do wish the Daytona came with the glidelock clasp though.
yOyOYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 02:54 PM   #26
jerryguo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bay Area
Watch: Rolex, PP, Lange
Posts: 1,024
Daytona is more comfortable.
jerryguo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 02:57 PM   #27
huba01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,449
The Daytona wears a lot more comfortable than a modern sub, 5513 or 1680 are way more comfortable than 16610 or 116610
huba01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 03:07 PM   #28
Leeh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Le
Location: NorCal
Watch: 'es are fun
Posts: 120
My 116520 is more comfortable than my 16610. The weight of the head and bracelet seems more balanced. The curves of the case hug my wrist better too.
Leeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.