5726 or 5167?

[lapince]

Originally Posted by yjfang

You have a really sporty watch in the Hulk, and a sports elegant watch in the 5712. If you must have a Patek, why not go for one of their dressier watches? The are so many cool and stylish ones outside of the Nautilus look.

I know some are great but my lifestyle and way of dressing would make the dressy watch stay 99% of the time in the safe, and that is something I do not want

[CWIN]

Originally Posted by Jack Cassidy

Go for the 5726 - it has a genuine arm presence. The 5167 has not. It is way too thin and a feminine watch for you wife.

I respectfully disagree with you 1000%

[Quotron]

Originally Posted by Jack Cassidy

Go for the 5726 - it has a genuine arm presence. The 5167 has not. It is way too thin and a feminine watch for you wife.

Ahh "wrist presence", the WIS version of "good personality"...

[HL65]

Originally Posted by Jack Cassidy

Go for the 5726 - it has a genuine arm presence. The 5167 has not. It is way too thin and a feminine watch for you wife.

[Jabberjaw]

Originally Posted by HL65

Well put. What an idiotic statement.

[lapince]

Originally Posted by HL65

Yep, agree 100000%, I love the fact that my 5712 is thin and light, it's great, I must be a woman inside

[mps354]

I'd go 5167 for sure...feminine or not

[lapince]

Originally Posted by CWIN

I respectfully disagree with you 1000%

I think all here disagree

[Jack Cassidy]

That is incorrect. All here do not disagree. That is easy to prove based on other threats. Many PP fans do not appreciate the thin watches at all. Fact.

Fair that my comment what "politically" incorrect to provoke debate, but how much executive class is it to hammer a guy 3 times on the head in a debate about watches?

[lapince]

Originally Posted by Jack Cassidy

That is incorrect. All here do not disagree. That is easy to prove based on other threats. Many PP fans do not appreciate the thin watches at all. Fact.

Fair that my comment what "politically" incorrect to provoke debate, but how much executive class is it to hammer a guy 3 times on the head in a debate about watches?

Jack, no problem, I wasn't at all shocked by your comment, it made me laugh, I respect your opinion, before getting my 5712 I also was only in big, thick and heavy watches, now the exact contrary, I think it's the "feminin" attribute that people here didn't appreciate, I found it funny

[HL65]

Originally Posted by lapince

Jack, no problem, I wasn't at all shocked by your comment, it made me laugh, I respect your opinion, before getting my 5712 I also was only in big, thick and heavy watches, now the exact contrary, I think it's the "feminin" attribute that people here didn't appreciate, I found it funny

I don't respect his opinion and it was more of a foolish comment. The 5167 is anything but feminine so to me the comment was simply rude. It is one thing to have opinion and another to make rude foolish statement. Class and tact are fine attributes of good forum members. Just my opinion Arnaud and Jack if you are reading.

Just like your post in 5711 or 5712 thread. Tiny girly wrist....Plain rude and foolish.

[MP5]

5167 guys, any regrets on the broker plain hands looking unfinished or out of place? It's always caught my eye as peculiar there isn't a bit more elegant Lume plot shape and champers or something ala gs or meant other brands. In fact more or less I do feel patek overlooks finishing on hands like I feel the similar ap RO/ nautilist rounded tips hands are better on the ap

[HL65]

My wife let me borrow for this wrist shot...Looks good in jeans or shorts or dressed up even in man's clothes.



PS She has 5068R and loves it so she agrees with you but hers has diamonds.

[lapince]

Originally Posted by HL65

I don't respect his opinion and it was more of a foolish comment. The 5167 is anything but feminine so to me the comment was simply rude. It is one thing to have opinion and another to make rude foolish statement. Class and tact are fine attributes of good forum members. Just my opinion Arnaud and Jack if you are reading.

Just like your post in 5711 or 5712 thread. Tiny girly wrist....Plain rude and foolish.

Ken I respect his opinion in the sense that he feels that the 5167 is too small and thin, but the way of expressing it was foolish IMO, and of course it wasn't very tactful or classy either, but in our times few people are anyways like I said I found it funny in the sense that the way of saying it was ridiculous, no doubt about it, Jack maybe thought this was the Panerai sub forum

Originally Posted by HL65

My wife let me borrow for this wrist shot...Looks good in jeans or shorts or dressed up even in man's clothes.



PS She has 5068R and loves it so she agrees with you but hers has diamonds.

Today I borrowed my wife's watch also, I have very tiny girly wrists too

246_809ce5bf5e640a02ab27e9ab3e91917f.jpg

[lapince]

Ok I was joking, that Pam wrist shot is not me, this is me with my 5712:

IMG_1852.jpg

IMG_1853.jpg

Have to get the bracelet adjusted though...

[HL65]

Originally Posted by lapince

Ok I was joking, that Pam wrist shot is not me, this is me with my 5712:

Attachment 571885

Attachment 571886

Have to get the bracelet adjusted though...