ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 November 2008, 02:34 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Enrique
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 51
|
I would go with the GMTIIC.
|
3 November 2008, 03:10 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,207
|
GMT IIC for sure.
|
3 November 2008, 05:01 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: StL
Posts: 447
|
I got the GMT. Why? Personal taste I guess.
|
3 November 2008, 05:31 PM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
If you don't have a sub, get one.
unless it doesn't do anything for you, go for GMT if you like it better. unless you travel and need the extra-timezone function.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
3 November 2008, 07:10 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Lawrence
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 80
|
Enjoy the fact that you get to choose between two great alternatives.
For me the GMTs Maxi dial, parachrome spring, and second time zone made the decision easy. I do wish the GMT 2c was a little more discrete. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.