ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ArchMerlin · 4 June 2019, 12:54 PM

CHNR, simply a beauty.

BNA/LION · 4 June 2019, 12:58 PM

Bluesy

jonny deacon · 4 June 2019, 01:01 PM

close, but I give the slight nod to the bluesy

Skavary · 4 June 2019, 05:21 PM

Man tough call. Both are beautiful watches. I was in the market for the bluesy VS the black TT sub and ended up going for the black TT for the following reason:

I just simply liked the contrast of the gold against the black as opposed to the gold VS blue. The blue is so bold and beautiful, that it almost overpowers the gold.

Perhaps it’s similar with the CHNR, where the gold blends in so nicely with the rest of the watch and provides a nice contrast with the black face.

Just my thoughts.

Both are beautiful watches and you can’t go wrong!

I’d go with the CHNR

socal80 · 22 June 2019, 04:45 PM

First time posting and new here, but the bluesy is what turned me on to Rolex when I was 19 years old. Recently met some major milestones and was able to pick one up after many years. The color is amazing in the sunlight and very happy with the purchase.

All that to say this won't be the last and the CHNR will most likely be in the future if I ever come across one at an AD.

View Poll Results: CHNR VS Bluesy
CHNR	130	62.20%
Bluesy	79	37.80%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll

4 June 2019, 12:58 PM	#32
BNA/LION 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Larry Location: San Diego, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 25,623	126711 (root bear) vs 116613 (bluesy) Bluesy __________________ ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.

4 June 2019, 12:54 PM	#31
ArchMerlin "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: Singapore Posts: 97	CHNR, simply a beauty.

4 June 2019, 01:01 PM	#33
jonny deacon "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: Lexington KY Posts: 595	close, but I give the slight nod to the bluesy

4 June 2019, 05:21 PM	#34
Skavary "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: US Posts: 102	Man tough call. Both are beautiful watches. I was in the market for the bluesy VS the black TT sub and ended up going for the black TT for the following reason: I just simply liked the contrast of the gold against the black as opposed to the gold VS blue. The blue is so bold and beautiful, that it almost overpowers the gold. Perhaps it’s similar with the CHNR, where the gold blends in so nicely with the rest of the watch and provides a nice contrast with the black face. Just my thoughts. Both are beautiful watches and you can’t go wrong! I’d go with the CHNR

22 June 2019, 04:45 PM	#35
socal80 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2019 Location: US Posts: 34	First time posting and new here, but the bluesy is what turned me on to Rolex when I was 19 years old. Recently met some major milestones and was able to pick one up after many years. The color is amazing in the sunlight and very happy with the purchase. All that to say this won't be the last and the CHNR will most likely be in the future if I ever come across one at an AD.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)