Tudor Submariner more collectible than the Rolex version?

[Cmfrank]

I love the fact that Tudor Subs from the early 90's are like Rolex Submariners from the 70's and 80's. Definitely a lot of vintage (or neo-vintage) bang for your buck if you ask me. Here is my 1993 Tudor Sub. It's the black version but the bezel has faded to a beautiful blue.

Additionally, I won't speak for "rareness" but when it comes to the collectability of these references, I know the price has roughly doubled over the last couple of years and would not surprise me one bit if that trend continued.

[-dustin]

Originally Posted by jpeezy14@hotmail.com

Ugh, I responded without having posted a picture of the watch that I was referencing. My mistake!

Tudor Sub with snowflake hands. That's the winner in my book. Wish it was still around.

[Yess]

Just because something is rare, it doesn't mean it's worth a lot of money. I learned that by watching Pawn Stars.

Nice watch though! Wear it in great health!

[fskywalker]

Originally Posted by CPRWATCH

Did someone say Tudor Blue Submariner , I bought this back in the day when not many people were interested in them , which suited me fine as I’ve never bought a watch because it’s the latest & greatest . And Ive always had a thing for blue watches, and this ticked every box then & still does now

Nice!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[ffscala]

Originally Posted by Journeyforce

Here is mine

I got it at a local thrift store for $50 plus tax at the beginning of the year. Pardon the quality of the pics, they were taken originally at the thrift store (which was a bit dark ) and I had to crop them in MS paint from my original post on WUS due to the new WUS site making all older pics a stupid WEBP file

I left it at my watchmaker's place right before the Covid virus state wide shutdown happened and he is still working on it because there is a backlog of other watches and clocks for him to work on (he shut down for a couple of months).

This watch seems to have ran well but was well worn, The watchmaker is only going to service the watch and replace the crystal, seals, crown tube and crown (He has the crown tube and crown in stock). He is not going to touch the rest of it.

Spectacular find - well done!

[springer]

Originally Posted by ffscala

I was pondering this today: due to the fact that there are inherently less Tudor Submariners in the world than the Rolex version due to it being discontinued many moons ago surely that makes them more rare thus more collectible. What do you think?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not at all.

[Singslinger]

Very nice pics in this thread. Thanks to all of you for posting!

[BrazenC5]

I like the no date flake look.



Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[dpt.calvin]

Scarcity and value can be correlated. But correlation does not imply causation. Just because something is scarce does not make it valuable.

[txaggie9307]

Originally Posted by BrazenC5

I like the no date flake look.



Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

That my friend is noice!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[-dustin]

Originally Posted by BrazenC5

I like the no date flake look.



Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Oh damn, that’s another good one. Man I wish Tudor would remake these. The hands are so awesome.

[BrazenC5]

Originally Posted by txaggie9307

That my friend is noice!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by -dustin

Oh damn, that’s another good one. Man I wish Tudor would remake these. The hands are so awesome.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[BrazenC5]

Originally Posted by ffscala

I was pondering this today: due to the fact that there are inherently less Tudor Submariners in the world than the Rolex version due to it being discontinued many moons ago surely that makes them more rare thus more collectible. What do you think?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There are some military issue (MN) that definitely have a collector following.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[ffscala]

Originally Posted by BrazenC5

I like the no date flake look.



Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

That’s a marvellous looking watch right there.

[rjstuf001]

Collectible or not, the Tudor Sub is a beauty.

My 79090 says hi

[interestedwatcher]

How is this even a question? Of course they are collectible. For every twenty full set 1680s kicking around, I imagine you would have one 94110... And accordingly that single 94110 would command a very good price.

[ffscala]

Originally Posted by interestedwatcher

How is this even a question? Of course they are collectible. For every twenty full set 1680s kicking around, I imagine you would have one 94110... And accordingly that single 94110 would command a very good price.

Yep, this makes a lot of sense

[Scaramanga74]

Originally Posted by Journeyforce

Here is mine

I got it at a local thrift store for $50 plus tax at the beginning of the year. Pardon the quality of the pics, they were taken originally at the thrift store (which was a bit dark ) and I had to crop them in MS paint from my original post on WUS due to the new WUS site making all older pics a stupid WEBP file

I left it at my watchmaker's place right before the Covid virus state wide shutdown happened and he is still working on it because there is a backlog of other watches and clocks for him to work on (he shut down for a couple of months).

This watch seems to have ran well but was well worn, The watchmaker is only going to service the watch and replace the crystal, seals, crown tube and crown (He has the crown tube and crown in stock). He is not going to touch the rest of it.

Nice find! Redial? That shield logo looks vere thin to me. Maybe it´s just the low quality of the pic playing tricks?