ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 November 2016, 02:45 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Come on, you get the point. You paid for the watch you get the entire package. Pick a less important car part for my analogy, it's the same difference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
7 November 2016, 02:46 AM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
|
7 November 2016, 03:03 AM | #63 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
7 November 2016, 03:12 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
7 November 2016, 03:14 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
What is going on over there? Dealers can hardly get any of the popular watches and then when one does they pull nonsense like this.
I'd be surprised if Rolex is requiring this and I doubt the AD cares what you do with the watch once you've bought it. If I had to guess he's trying to hold on to the card to keep the buyer's name clear in case you return it, then he still has a clear card to sell with the watch. The one year thing sounds like a disguise. Did you ask him if he was going to put your name on the card and activate it?
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
7 November 2016, 03:38 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
|
An interesting concept Mr Furguson.
Keep the name clear in case of it getting returned. Never thought of that one tbh Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 November 2016, 03:39 AM | #67 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
unaccceptable
|
7 November 2016, 03:40 AM | #68 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
In answer to your last question. I am 99% certain the answer is none !!!! They would still be sold but just to someone who wants to keep it and not on the merry go round of grey dealers etc. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
7 November 2016, 03:47 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SCOTLAND
Posts: 53
|
Who's the AD.
|
7 November 2016, 03:49 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,009
|
With a 6 year warranty requirement in UK I see the logic. Don't necessarily agree. First year dealer holds card, after one year dealer then issues the 5 year warranty card to buyer, next five years of warranty on Rolex. Dealer shits his theoretical liability to first year from year six. In an unlikely event of a first year claim it is satisfied by the Rolex warranty card sitting in abeyance. Dealer effectively stretches Rolex warranty to a six year window and Rolex will be liable for year six not the AD himself. Very logical for dealer and protects himself from a contingent liability,if he can get consumer to agree to a year hold on warranty papers being issued. All good for purchaser just unorthodox.
|
7 November 2016, 03:49 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
|
|
7 November 2016, 03:54 AM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: UK
Posts: 198
|
Quote:
|
|
7 November 2016, 03:55 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SCOTLAND
Posts: 53
|
Come on tell us who it is so we don't get stung!!!!!!!!!!!!.
|
7 November 2016, 04:12 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,009
|
Low risk, warranty card is valid five years from date of issue. AD's should be concerned about having liability for year six in the U.K. 6 year warranty window. Any claims would be at the AD's expense in year six, not really fair for the retailer to get stuck with an expensive warranty claim six years after a purchase and a year after factory warranty expires. So I see the logic.
|
7 November 2016, 04:25 AM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
|
Such a mess around a simple watch
iPhone/Tapatalk
__________________
Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- *new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new * http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1 |
7 November 2016, 04:28 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: steve
Location: south , east , uk
Watch: all of them
Posts: 448
|
|
7 November 2016, 04:29 AM | #77 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Quote:
|
|
7 November 2016, 05:12 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SCOTLAND
Posts: 53
|
We are still waiting, cut the mustard who is the AD??????????.
|
7 November 2016, 05:16 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midlands
Posts: 20
|
Does the card have to be swiped? And what is the purpose of swiping it?
I jab pays for a watch over the phone and asked it to be transferred to my local branch. It's my first Rolex. Is it ok for my local branch to do this or should it be already swiped and filled out so it matches the receipt? Thanks |
7 November 2016, 05:47 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Central Cal
Watch: Dads Omega Cal 601
Posts: 707
|
|
7 November 2016, 05:48 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
|
Just buy
from David, he has one in unworn condition.. http://davidsw.com/product/rolex-116...t-master-ii-3/ |
7 November 2016, 06:12 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 1,207
|
I would take my money somewhere else, come over to the US for a quick trip, sports models are a lot more plentiful here with ad's from what I understand.
|
7 November 2016, 06:14 AM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 96
|
It wasn't my intention to name and shame the AD I just wanted feedback if this was normal on limited supply Rolex - thanks for the replies and I can see it isn't!
|
7 November 2016, 06:14 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,572
|
Simple answer is NO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 November 2016, 06:22 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 400
|
|
7 November 2016, 07:10 AM | #86 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,680
|
Thats absurd....not a hard watch to get....go elsewhere
|
7 November 2016, 07:19 AM | #87 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Nederlands
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
|
|
7 November 2016, 07:22 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
|
|
7 November 2016, 07:26 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
|
7 November 2016, 07:30 AM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
After bringing the forum to a slow boil, can you enunciate why you will not reveal the standard practice of an AD? Its not shaming....its just informing an interested community what the policies are of an AD. Did the AD swear you to secrecy? I'm assuming the AD stands by their policies and is glad for them to be known. No shaming, just providing information.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.