The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 November 2016, 02:45 AM   #61
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by RGAmos View Post
Not really.


Come on, you get the point. You paid for the watch you get the entire package. Pick a less important car part for my analogy, it's the same difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 02:46 AM   #62
MonBK
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrs146 View Post
Come on, you get the point. You paid for the watch you get the entire package. Pick a less important car part for my analogy, it's the same difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The title.
MonBK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:03 AM   #63
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muzz View Post
I would not accept that. Would not do business at an AD that implemented those practices either.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:12 AM   #64
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonBK View Post
The title.


Bingo!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:14 AM   #65
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
What is going on over there? Dealers can hardly get any of the popular watches and then when one does they pull nonsense like this.

I'd be surprised if Rolex is requiring this and I doubt the AD cares what you do with the watch once you've bought it. If I had to guess he's trying to hold on to the card to keep the buyer's name clear in case you return it, then he still has a clear card to sell with the watch. The one year thing sounds like a disguise.

Did you ask him if he was going to put your name on the card and activate it?
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:38 AM   #66
Shaky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
An interesting concept Mr Furguson.
Keep the name clear in case of it getting returned. Never thought of that one tbh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:39 AM   #67
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
unaccceptable
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:40 AM   #68
Shaky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephvman View Post
I wouldn't like it but frankly the only reason anyone would have to hold their warranty card is to resell the watch, and if the piece is that hard to get and selling at a premium on the secondary market I can understand their position. It's a no-win on this forum for AD's. People bitch because they can't find hot inventory except at premium prices at grey dealers, yet they fight tooth and nail against anything Rolex attempts to do in order to put watches into the hands of end-users and not re-sellers, whether it be holding warranty cards, removing stickers, etc. How many more ceramic Daytonas would be available if dealers held warranty cards on those?


In answer to your last question. I am 99% certain the answer is none !!!!

They would still be sold but just to someone who wants to keep it and not on the merry go round of grey dealers etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:47 AM   #69
Andreas Schuback
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SCOTLAND
Posts: 53
Who's the AD.
Andreas Schuback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:49 AM   #70
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,009
With a 6 year warranty requirement in UK I see the logic. Don't necessarily agree. First year dealer holds card, after one year dealer then issues the 5 year warranty card to buyer, next five years of warranty on Rolex. Dealer shits his theoretical liability to first year from year six. In an unlikely event of a first year claim it is satisfied by the Rolex warranty card sitting in abeyance. Dealer effectively stretches Rolex warranty to a six year window and Rolex will be liable for year six not the AD himself. Very logical for dealer and protects himself from a contingent liability,if he can get consumer to agree to a year hold on warranty papers being issued. All good for purchaser just unorthodox.
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:49 AM   #71
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas Schuback View Post
Who's the AD.
I've asked too and I'd be keen to know
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:54 AM   #72
stash21
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: UK
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by cornerstore View Post
With a 6 year warranty requirement in UK I see the logic. Don't necessarily agree. First year dealer holds card, after one year dealer then issues the 5 year warranty card to buyer, next five years of warranty on Rolex. Dealer shits his theoretical liability to first year from year six. In an unlikely event of a first year claim it is satisfied by the Rolex warranty card sitting in abeyance. Dealer effectively stretches Rolex warranty to a six year window and Rolex will be liable for year six not the AD himself. Very logical for dealer and protects himself from a contingent liability,if he can get consumer to agree to a year hold on warranty papers being issued. All good for purchaser just unorthodox.
Sounds too dodgy. Why would an ad risk their status with Rolex to get the extra year warranty. This AD is just being total bellend.
stash21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 03:55 AM   #73
Andreas Schuback
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SCOTLAND
Posts: 53
Come on tell us who it is so we don't get stung!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Andreas Schuback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 04:12 AM   #74
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by stash21 View Post
Sounds too dodgy. Why would an ad risk their status with Rolex to get the extra year warranty. This AD is just being total bellend.
Low risk, warranty card is valid five years from date of issue. AD's should be concerned about having liability for year six in the U.K. 6 year warranty window. Any claims would be at the AD's expense in year six, not really fair for the retailer to get stuck with an expensive warranty claim six years after a purchase and a year after factory warranty expires. So I see the logic.
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 04:25 AM   #75
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Such a mess around a simple watch


iPhone/Tapatalk
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 04:28 AM   #76
ARTISAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: steve
Location: south , east , uk
Watch: all of them
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by stash21 View Post
Buy the watch let them keep the card the inform rolex U.K. That one of their ADs is refusing to give you your property.
also what happen's if they lose the card.........

what AD is it ????????
ARTISAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 04:29 AM   #77
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephvman View Post
I wouldn't like it but frankly the only reason anyone would have to hold their warranty card is to resell the watch, and if the piece is that hard to get and selling at a premium on the secondary market I can understand their position. It's a no-win on this forum for AD's. People bitch because they can't find hot inventory except at premium prices at grey dealers, yet they fight tooth and nail against anything Rolex attempts to do in order to put watches into the hands of end-users and not re-sellers, whether it be holding warranty cards, removing stickers, etc. How many more ceramic Daytonas would be available if dealers held warranty cards on those?
While no one likes the idea of buyers just buying to resell at huge profits, this is the way the free market works, and punishing all buyers, regardless of their motives, is not the way to go. Really, what happens to a watch or any commodity after it is sold is not the seller's business.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 05:12 AM   #78
Andreas Schuback
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SCOTLAND
Posts: 53
We are still waiting, cut the mustard who is the AD??????????.
Andreas Schuback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 05:16 AM   #79
immy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Midlands
Posts: 20
Does the card have to be swiped? And what is the purpose of swiping it?
I jab pays for a watch over the phone and asked it to be transferred to my local branch. It's my first Rolex. Is it ok for my local branch to do this or should it be already swiped and filled out so it matches the receipt? Thanks
immy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 05:47 AM   #80
Aceldama
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Central Cal
Watch: Dads Omega Cal 601
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas Schuback View Post
We are still waiting, cut the mustard who is the AD??????????.
I'm done opening these AD thread. Same crap every time... Guess the AD. I don't buy new anyway...
Aceldama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 05:48 AM   #81
gregmoeck
"TRF" Member
 
gregmoeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
Just buy
from David, he has one in unworn condition..

http://davidsw.com/product/rolex-116...t-master-ii-3/
gregmoeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 06:12 AM   #82
porschedude
"TRF" Member
 
porschedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 1,207
I would take my money somewhere else, come over to the US for a quick trip, sports models are a lot more plentiful here with ad's from what I understand.
porschedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 06:14 AM   #83
coolaking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 96
It wasn't my intention to name and shame the AD I just wanted feedback if this was normal on limited supply Rolex - thanks for the replies and I can see it isn't!
coolaking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 06:14 AM   #84
brucethemanlee
"TRF" Member
 
brucethemanlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,572
Simple answer is NO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brucethemanlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 06:22 AM   #85
maton12
"TRF" Member
 
maton12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradj View Post
I don't understand the BLNR wait list comments. I've been to 3 or 4 Ad's in the past couple months and all had BLNR on display.
It's a big wide world out there

Europe and parts of Asia the BLNR and Cameron are in very limited numbers
maton12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 07:10 AM   #86
Daytonaman799
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,680
Thats absurd....not a hard watch to get....go elsewhere
Daytonaman799 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 07:19 AM   #87
nobbylon
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Nederlands
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmoeck View Post
Just buy
from David, he has one in unworn condition..

http://davidsw.com/product/rolex-116...t-master-ii-3/
great idea but that's still £500 more than list in the UK and if bought there and brought here would also be taxed at UK 20% making it £8400 so nearly 2k over list!. If I really wanted it I'd take it at list and personally shove that card sideways into.......
nobbylon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 07:22 AM   #88
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daytonaman799 View Post
Thats absurd....not a hard watch to get....go elsewhere
Not hard to get where??? I'm guessing you've not heard about UK availability?
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 07:26 AM   #89
No SUBctitute
"TRF" Member
 
No SUBctitute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daytonaman799 View Post
Thats absurd....not a hard watch to get....go elsewhere
Yes, but he's paying $1000 less than USA MSRP.

I say buy the watch, force them to give you the warranty, and then flip it and go show them the money you made.
No SUBctitute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2016, 07:30 AM   #90
No SUBctitute
"TRF" Member
 
No SUBctitute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaking View Post
It wasn't my intention to name and shame the AD I just wanted feedback if this was normal on limited supply Rolex - thanks for the replies and I can see it isn't!
After bringing the forum to a slow boil, can you enunciate why you will not reveal the standard practice of an AD? Its not shaming....its just informing an interested community what the policies are of an AD. Did the AD swear you to secrecy? I'm assuming the AD stands by their policies and is glad for them to be known. No shaming, just providing information.
No SUBctitute is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.