Anyone replaced their Explorer with a Sub?

[robbyrolex]

I traded my 16610 for my 214270 2 years ago.
I should have kept the Sub and bought the Exp. but
don’t regret the decision very much, I prefer the
214270. I’m not a fan of the super case 116610,
the flashy ceramic bezel or extra long clasp on the new sub.
Try to keep the Exp. and save more for the 116610 then decide which to keep.
Can’t go wrong either way, they are both great watches.

[uncufunc]

I went from the Exp1 mk1 to a GMTcLN. I miss the simplicity of the Exp and am thinking of adding it now

[H25B]

Only thing I have against the Explorer II is the bezel being more prone to dings/scratches. Otherwise it’s a great value IMHO.

[Mandy01]

Originally Posted by Rolexatlast

No, can't agree with that.

Porsche 911 - yes. But not 3 series

The Sub 114060 (no date ) is probably together with the Daytona the most iconic watch in the Rolex collection and top 5 more classic watch by any brand, is by no means a BMW 3 series like someone suggested.

[Mandy01]

Originally Posted by systems1312341

started with a new Sub Date in early 2016. It was wearing me. Attention- too much and not the good kind. sold it -Been wearing a 16570 for 3 years. It's fare more rare to see and doesn't attract the unwanted attention. Subs are the BMW 3 series of watches.

The Sub 114060 (no date ) is probably together with the Daytona the most iconic watch in the Rolex collection and top 5 more classic watch by any brand, is by no means a BMW 3 series. It is for a reason probably the most copied model by other brands on earth.