ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

emersm · 1 July 2021, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cop414

Looks good Merle. The Tudor looks like it’s in between the two as far as size, probably because of the wider bezel.

Thanks, Tim.
Yeah, I was surprised that the BB36 is bigger.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chloebear

Congrats Merle! The new 36 looks fantastic on you. Please keep us posted as you get acquainted with your new Explorer. Pros and cons versus the 39 and lots of pictures please.

Thanks, will do.

I think Rolex nailed it on the 39 and the new 36. Both will work for most people. I love the 39mm version but I'm a slight lean towards the 36 now.

Should definitely try it on first

Quote:

Originally Posted by DLRIDES

This

Quote:

Originally Posted by djyolky

Indeed. And we're not living in the 80s anymore. Reminds me of the scene from Tommy Boy, "faaaaat guy in a little cooooat".

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using Tapatalk

I agree. My horrible close-up pics didn't help either

Quote:

Originally Posted by slimpickens

Personally, I love reading all the hate for the 36mm - it makes me more and more hopeful I'll be able to get one.

Keep it coming!

It is entertaining... ish.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richris1

Congratulations! I think 39mm looks best

Quote:

Originally Posted by teabags001

Honestly the 39 looks better. I would say the 39 almost looks a tad small on you. Wear what you like but the new 36 wears like a 34 imo.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks

Longhorn · 1 July 2021, 10:57 PM

proportions look great on the new explorer. I think it looks great on a big wrist, it's a classic aesthetic with all the functional perks of the modern Rolex. Can't wait for one myself!

javier · 2 July 2021, 12:28 AM

I had a 36mm in my 6,5 inches wrist and sold it becuse it felt small IMO

mike morris · 2 July 2021, 12:32 AM

My 7.25 , but only for dress up .

John S · 2 July 2021, 12:33 AM

It looked like you are wearing your kid's watch.

904VT · 2 July 2021, 12:53 AM

Perfect fit. Congrats!

904VT · 2 July 2021, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John S

It looked like you are wearing your kid's watch.

Would you like to buy my pre-owned Breitling Super Avenger? I've been looking for a buyer for years...

Brian Page · 2 July 2021, 01:04 AM

Too small for my taste

Boopie · 2 July 2021, 01:11 AM

Looks great. I don’t think the whole watch face/case should take up most of the wrist.

I know several tall (over 6’) men who wear a classic 36mm Rolex (DJ and also YG DD) and the watch looks just fine. Part of it depends on how much you want your watch to stand out or blend in. Nothing wrong with either (women can wear a chain necklace or what is actually called a “statement necklace,” depending on the look the woman is going for).

Enjoy!

904VT · 2 July 2021, 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boopie

Looks great. I don’t think the whole watch face/case should take up most of the wrist.

I know several tall (over 6’) men who wear a classic 36mm Rolex (DJ and also YG DD) and the watch looks just fine. Part of it depends on how much you want your watch to stand out or blend in. Nothing wrong with either (women can wear a chain necklace or what is actually called a “statement necklace,” depending on the look the woman is going for).

Enjoy!

James Gandolfini wore the YG Day Date 36 very well. 40mm Sub was his daily watch, but 36 looked great. My wrist is 7.75 inches and I'd gladly wear 36mm. The whole too small fad seems to be a thing with more modern collectors that become interested in watches more recently.

LA_LEC · 2 July 2021, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boopie

Looks great. I don’t think the whole watch face/case should take up most of the wrist.

I know several tall (over 6’) men who wear a classic 36mm Rolex (DJ and also YG DD) and the watch looks just fine. Part of it depends on how much you want your watch to stand out or blend in. Nothing wrong with either (women can wear a chain necklace or what is actually called a “statement necklace,” depending on the look the woman is going for).

Enjoy!

A "statement necklace" - Who knew? Glad I am not a woman.

Clockmeister · 2 July 2021, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannyp

I like the 36. 39mm watches look find on your wrist, but the Explorer is a 36mm watch.

That said, I think what makes it look a bit small is that you've got the bracelet a bit too tight, and it makes it look as though it's pinching. Try a pick with the EasyLink extended.

The Explorer is a 36mm watch is like saying a Patek Calatrava (3919) is a 33mm watch. It was originally that size but times have changed and PP produces larger watches to keep up with demand. I don’t think Patek sells many 33mm watches at this time.

As far as the size of the Explorer, it’s obviously subjective.
With that said the tuna can sized watches of ten years ago have become smaller. The interest in vintage watches has probably contributed to smaller sized watches.

Tanvo · 2 July 2021, 08:01 AM

Too small

173rdabn · 2 July 2021, 08:08 AM

Nice watch. Sorry I sold mine.

John S · 2 July 2021, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 904VT

Would you like to buy my pre-owned Breitling Super Avenger? I've been looking for a buyer for years...

No thanks. But I have a brand new Explore 2, black dial, ref: 216570, waiting for you to buy.

Full set. Warranty card dated Jun 21.

PM me if interested.

matthew P · 2 July 2021, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brich436

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Love this watch….. love that strap.
Don’t love them together strangely.

Need curved spring bars to stop it getting eaten up on the new case?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

matthew P · 2 July 2021, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emersm

I wear watches that range between 34 mm and 42 mm.

For me, 37mm-38mm is generally the sweet spot.

I must admit, this watch is much more comfortable than the 39 mm I own.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It looks small but perfectly fine in this photo….. the close ups with the wide iPhone lens don’t do sizing discussions any favors.

I imagine with your wrist size it’s going to come down to one being classically smaller sized and one being modern sport watch sized….. your personal taste and how you want to watch to look and feel will decide it for you.

I love the MKII but I’m leaning toward the 124270 for its upgrades and smaller dial.
In a lot of ways it’s proportions are similar to the MKII , just a smaller package.
I do prefer the handset proportions and the lack of negative space on the dial.

Keep the owner ship reports coming, I appreciate the perspective …… it’s not the slam dunk easy winner that 6 or 6.5 inch wrists seem to be making when choosing the newer model.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mattomatic · 2 July 2021, 12:47 PM

Here’s the new 36mm on my 6.5” wrist. Absolutely love it. Most comfortable watch I’ve worn.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

waynorth · 2 July 2021, 01:37 PM

I like the 39mm better, but the hands should be a tad fatter on it.

Pinchy · 2 July 2021, 01:40 PM

This IS Rolex's best watch. Maybe not the "coolest" or "flashiest" but to please the owner. It's straight up awesome.

904VT · 2 July 2021, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John S

No thanks. But I have a brand new Explore 2, black dial, ref: 216570, waiting for you to buy.

Full set. Warranty card dated Jun 21.

PM me if interested.

Swap and it's a deal

John S · 3 July 2021, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 904VT

Swap and it's a deal

Swap + lots of cash from you.

cvo · 3 July 2021, 09:59 AM

Explorer II would be the right fit.

Otto · 3 July 2021, 10:03 AM

I’m sorry to report this personal opinion to those who love the new Explorer, but I was in central Tokyo yesterday and I tried on a new 36 mm stainless steel Explorer and I was very disappointed. I already own a 39 mm Explorer, the fully-lumed version. I was wearing a Day-Date 40 yesterday. Anyway, my wrist is 7” exactly. I had seen the new Explorer in multiple settings in real life where at times it looked very small and at other times looked larger, but this was my first time to hold and wear the new model. I had a previous experience with an earlier 36 mm version I wore for a week or so a few years ago. That had been a positive experience, so I was hopeful about the new version. The older model looked smaller than my regular watches, but I still enjoyed wearing it because it felt like the older 36 mm watches I had worn earlier. Yesterday, however, I was shocked at how small the new Explorer felt in my hand, and when I put it on my wrist, it seemed tiny. Even the young female Japanese sales representative remarked it was very small for me; not a good choice. At first, I couldn’t reconcile the reality I saw with the videos I’ve seen, but then I recalled watches often appear larger in photos and videos. Anyway, the more I looked at it on my arm, the more I realized the biggest difference between the watch I had on and the watch I wore for a week a few years ago was the bracelet. It just seemed very small to me, which is counterintuitive since it is presumably heavier and better made than the old bracelets. The new slimming and tapering of the bracelet, however, completely changed my perception of the watch. Unfortunately, I didn’t get any photos in the store. On a more positive note, I tried on a new model Polar Explorer and I was immediately in love with the new watch. I had owned a 42 mm Polar before, but it felt a bit large for me. The new version seemed much slimmer and fit much better on my wrist. It felt like a different watch to me.

I suppose the common element for me in both experiences is that sometimes subtle design changes can have the biggest impacts from a personal perspective.

direwolf · 3 July 2021, 10:13 AM

Thank you for the feedback Otto. I have a similar size wrist and am very much looking forward to seeing the new Polar in person. The matte indices are appealing to me, as well as the trimmer lugs.

7enderbender · 3 July 2021, 10:46 AM

Perfect size for this watch. This is how it was designed originally for a reason. Good to see that Rolex is willing to go against fashion trends. This one is on my shortlist.

Calatrava r · 3 July 2021, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slimpickens

Personally, I love reading all the hate for the 36mm - it makes me more and more hopeful I'll be able to get one.

Keep it coming!

I think the same way, but I think all the folks offered one will take it.

fskywalker · 3 July 2021, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slimpickens

Personally, I love reading all the hate for the 36mm - it makes me more and more hopeful I'll be able to get one.

Keep it coming!

JRell · 3 July 2021, 12:42 PM

We should be happy people like different size watches, different colors, different complications, or else that wait list for the very same watch everyone loves just got even longer.

Brny11 · 4 July 2021, 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emersm

I wear watches that range between 34 mm and 42 mm.

For me, 37mm-38mm is generally the sweet spot.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks great! Much better proportioned than the 39 (I loveee my 39)!

Speaking of 37-38mm, The new 38mm zenith original is literally the perfect watch! Will be next on my list!

2 July 2021, 12:33 AM	#65
John S "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2019 Real Name: John Location: Earth Posts: 193	It looked like you are wearing your kid's watch. __________________ Patek Philippe Calatrava 6119G, Piaget Polo Skeleton GOA45001, JLC Master Control Calendar 4148420

2 July 2021, 12:47 PM	#78
Mattomatic "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Matt Location: Toronto, ON Watch: Explorer 1 Posts: 292	Here’s the new 36mm on my 6.5” wrist. Absolutely love it. Most comfortable watch I’ve worn. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ -------------------------------- 116710BLNR - DJ 1601- Explorer 124270 - Pepsi 16710 http://instagram.com/timetowatch

3 July 2021, 10:13 AM	#85
direwolf "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: USA Watch: 16610 Posts: 472	Thank you for the feedback Otto. I have a similar size wrist and am very much looking forward to seeing the new Polar in person. The matte indices are appealing to me, as well as the trimmer lugs. __________________ Inspiration move me brightly

3 July 2021, 12:42 PM	#89
JRell "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2020 Location: Pittsburgh Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee Posts: 7,067	We should be happy people like different size watches, different colors, different complications, or else that wait list for the very same watch everyone loves just got even longer. __________________ 126710 BLNR Jubilee

1 July 2021, 10:57 PM	#62
Longhorn "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Austin, Texas Watch: HULK SMASH Posts: 584	proportions look great on the new explorer. I think it looks great on a big wrist, it's a classic aesthetic with all the functional perks of the modern Rolex. Can't wait for one myself!

2 July 2021, 12:28 AM	#63
javier "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Argentina Posts: 803	I had a 36mm in my 6,5 inches wrist and sold it becuse it felt small IMO

2 July 2021, 12:53 AM	#66
904VT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: USA Watch: All Rolex Posts: 7,024	Perfect fit. Congrats!

2 July 2021, 01:04 AM	#68
Brian Page "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: USA Posts: 6,623	Too small for my taste

2 July 2021, 01:11 AM	#69
Boopie "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Beverly Hills, CA Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 3,940	Looks great. I don’t think the whole watch face/case should take up most of the wrist. I know several tall (over 6’) men who wear a classic 36mm Rolex (DJ and also YG DD) and the watch looks just fine. Part of it depends on how much you want your watch to stand out or blend in. Nothing wrong with either (women can wear a chain necklace or what is actually called a “statement necklace,” depending on the look the woman is going for). Enjoy!

2 July 2021, 08:01 AM	#73
Tanvo "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: US Posts: 194	Too small

2 July 2021, 08:08 AM	#74
173rdabn 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: George Location: Cape Cod Watch: 216570 Explorer II Posts: 2,415	Nice watch. Sorry I sold mine.

2 July 2021, 01:37 PM	#79
waynorth "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Real Name: Keith Location: Alaska Posts: 221	I like the 39mm better, but the hands should be a tad fatter on it.

2 July 2021, 01:40 PM	#80
Pinchy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2021 Location: California Posts: 599	This IS Rolex's best watch. Maybe not the "coolest" or "flashiest" but to please the owner. It's straight up awesome.

3 July 2021, 09:59 AM	#83
cvo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: C Vo Location: Georgia Watch: 117610LN 116610LN Posts: 1,014	Explorer II would be the right fit.

3 July 2021, 10:03 AM	#84
Otto 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Japan Watch: Daytona and others Posts: 3,023	I’m sorry to report this personal opinion to those who love the new Explorer, but I was in central Tokyo yesterday and I tried on a new 36 mm stainless steel Explorer and I was very disappointed. I already own a 39 mm Explorer, the fully-lumed version. I was wearing a Day-Date 40 yesterday. Anyway, my wrist is 7” exactly. I had seen the new Explorer in multiple settings in real life where at times it looked very small and at other times looked larger, but this was my first time to hold and wear the new model. I had a previous experience with an earlier 36 mm version I wore for a week or so a few years ago. That had been a positive experience, so I was hopeful about the new version. The older model looked smaller than my regular watches, but I still enjoyed wearing it because it felt like the older 36 mm watches I had worn earlier. Yesterday, however, I was shocked at how small the new Explorer felt in my hand, and when I put it on my wrist, it seemed tiny. Even the young female Japanese sales representative remarked it was very small for me; not a good choice. At first, I couldn’t reconcile the reality I saw with the videos I’ve seen, but then I recalled watches often appear larger in photos and videos. Anyway, the more I looked at it on my arm, the more I realized the biggest difference between the watch I had on and the watch I wore for a week a few years ago was the bracelet. It just seemed very small to me, which is counterintuitive since it is presumably heavier and better made than the old bracelets. The new slimming and tapering of the bracelet, however, completely changed my perception of the watch. Unfortunately, I didn’t get any photos in the store. On a more positive note, I tried on a new model Polar Explorer and I was immediately in love with the new watch. I had owned a 42 mm Polar before, but it felt a bit large for me. The new version seemed much slimmer and fit much better on my wrist. It felt like a different watch to me. I suppose the common element for me in both experiences is that sometimes subtle design changes can have the biggest impacts from a personal perspective.

3 July 2021, 10:46 AM	#86
7enderbender "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2020 Location: USA Posts: 976	Perfect size for this watch. This is how it was designed originally for a reason. Good to see that Rolex is willing to go against fashion trends. This one is on my shortlist.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)