ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gerry62 · 8 September 2015, 07:50 PM

114060

HogwldFLTR · 8 September 2015, 08:13 PM

Hard to believe not a single photo of the Sub C and only of the Sub C Dates. I'll fix that.

Justinmg · 8 September 2015, 10:07 PM

No date, that's the classic!

chickennho · 9 September 2015, 10:47 AM

114060, but i love my Hulk

TK-710 · 9 September 2015, 11:19 AM

I'm a little surprised at the poll results. I guess that is because I prefer the Sub date to the Sub and I guess we all subconsciously think our opinion is the popular one. Personally I can't own a watch without a date. And if I could it would be the Explorer.

droptopman · 9 September 2015, 12:13 PM

Had several variations of both. If I can only choose one, I would go no date.

daytonaTBR · 9 September 2015, 12:36 PM

I have the date version so I'm going with that! But you can't go wrong with the no date version!

flatmad · 9 September 2015, 12:58 PM

It will be interesting to see if anyone has both!

Yes date is good function and ND is cleaner look..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Foxglove · 9 September 2015, 01:01 PM

Definitively split 50/50.

Watchgeek5000 · 9 September 2015, 02:14 PM

I'll tell you the truth, I'm wearing an 114060 right now and its cool, BUT!!!!
I have never worn a submariner date and someone say to me, " O you got the date version...why"? But I have had many people see my "no date" and say " why did you get the no date" in a disappointed tone.

Wolf Kh · 16 September 2015, 10:44 AM

2015

kirksingleton · 16 September 2015, 02:13 PM

I find the date a necessity for me.

thejerseyrock · 16 September 2015, 02:20 PM

If I only wore one - date (because i never know what day it is)…. but if you wear a lot of different watches every week… no date… and if you want the "classic" … no date

chrisb57 · 16 September 2015, 05:59 PM

Back in the early 2000s I purchased my second Rolex a 14060M a yr later I sold it , why I will never know .
I also got a 1990 BM sub date and loved it emensly,strangely that got sold to .
I gues I should have never sold the 14060M in the first place I would still have it and probably not aspire to have another.
However my wife always knew I pined over the none date , hense my 40th birthday present bought in Paris this year.

beer · 16 September 2015, 06:03 PM

i must admit very interesting the (slight) majority went for no date even as an only watch

travisb · 16 September 2015, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisb57

Back in the early 2000s I purchased my second Rolex a 14060M a yr later I sold it , why I will never know .
I also got a 1990 BM sub date and loved it emensly,strangely that got sold to .
I gues I should have never sold the 14060M in the first place I would still have it and probably not aspire to have another.
However my wife always knew I pined over the none date , hense my 40th birthday present bought in Paris this year.

Nice! Keeper!

Snoop_ · 24 November 2015, 12:16 PM

I went with no date and don't regret it one bit.

Egelber · 24 November 2015, 12:22 PM

Im married so NO MORE DATE NITE!!!! No pun intended 114060....

kopykopy · 24 November 2015, 03:26 PM

All my Rolexes have No Date. I like the cleaner look as well as I dont have to set the date. However, all my friends who wear rolexes have cyclops. Even my wife commented "why did you buy a no date rolex?" when I got my Sub C No Date. Heck, I love my No Dates. But one fine day it will change when I finally get my Ice Blue Platinum Day Date.

andrew79 · 25 November 2015, 09:48 AM

Voted date, but love both...

Evo6 · 25 November 2015, 10:16 AM

The original...
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1448410589.100760.jpg

Although the Hulk has beel haunting my thoughts of late.

If this watch existed (it's a color shifted Hulk) It be all the Rolex I'd ever need...

Spikedlee · 25 November 2015, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo6

The original...
Attachment 683561

Although the Hulk has beel haunting my thoughts of late.

If this watch existed (it's a color shifted Hulk) It be all the Rolex I'd ever need...

I recognized that shirt and floor and thought - hey maybe this guy lives in my building! Then I realized that last pic is of me! LOL

Evo6 · 25 November 2015, 12:15 PM

Hope you don't mind, your Hulk pick was a perfect canidate for some Photoshop foollery.

Spikedlee · 25 November 2015, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo6

Hope you don't mind, your Hulk pick was a perfect canidate for some Photoshop foollery.

Not at all I love the color!

cdnwatchguy · 25 November 2015, 12:27 PM

Oddly for me...

The previous iterations I by far preferred the date version.

The newer ceramic versions I far prefer the no date.

elkaholic · 25 November 2015, 12:31 PM

In terms of the newest ceramic versions, I prefer the Sub 114060. For some reason it just appears more clean and proportionate to me.

It's a toss up for me between the 5 digit Sub date/non-date versions. I've owned the 14060m, 16610 and 114060. I would (and will) have any of the three of them again.

mechanicaltime · 25 November 2015, 06:20 PM

I really love my SubC. I love it. That said, I would love any sub.

jw0n · 25 November 2015, 06:43 PM

I agree that the 14060/114060 has a very clean, balanced look. But, I really enjoy having the convenience of being able to tell the date when glancing down at my wrist. So, being a practical person, I pick date.

psychokandy · 25 November 2015, 08:23 PM

I voted for the Classic. 114060. And this is my first Rolex as well.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Malbolge · 25 November 2015, 08:47 PM

oh wow, i thought the ND would be in the left field, an odd ball. And I would have this nice unique watch... and turns out it is MORE popular than the Date one in the polls. eh...

View Poll Results: Which Ceramic Submariner model would you prefer if you could only own 1 Watch?
Submariner Ceramic 116610 (Date)	492	44.77%
Submariner Ceramic 114060 (No Date)	607	55.23%
Voters: 1099. You may not vote on this poll

8 September 2015, 08:13 PM	#92
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,668	Hard to believe not a single photo of the Sub C and only of the Sub C Dates. I'll fix that. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

9 September 2015, 12:13 PM	#96
droptopman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Mark Location: Washington State Watch: SUBS and GMT's! Posts: 9,664	Had several variations of both. If I can only choose one, I would go no date. __________________ Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today? Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score. Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers? Ty: By height.

9 September 2015, 12:58 PM	#98
flatmad "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Plano, Texas Watch: 116500 Posts: 167	The Definitive Ceramic Submariner Date vs No-Date Thread (116610 vs 114060) It will be interesting to see if anyone has both! Yes date is good function and ND is cleaner look.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

16 September 2015, 06:03 PM	#105
beer "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: Watch Dealer atm! Watch: all Posts: 2,800	i must admit very interesting the (slight) majority went for no date even as an only watch __________________

8 September 2015, 07:50 PM	#91
Gerry62 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Italy EU Watch: Rolex Panerai Posts: 7,487	114060

8 September 2015, 10:07 PM	#93
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO/EXPL Posts: 3,371	No date, that's the classic!

9 September 2015, 10:47 AM	#94
chickennho "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Real Name: Khanh Location: Somewhere Watch: All gone Posts: 133	114060, but i love my Hulk

9 September 2015, 11:19 AM	#95
TK-710 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Upstate Watch: 116600 Posts: 2,156	I'm a little surprised at the poll results. I guess that is because I prefer the Sub date to the Sub and I guess we all subconsciously think our opinion is the popular one. Personally I can't own a watch without a date. And if I could it would be the Explorer.

9 September 2015, 12:36 PM	#97
daytonaTBR "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: N/A Posts: 1,466	I have the date version so I'm going with that! But you can't go wrong with the no date version!

9 September 2015, 01:01 PM	#99
Foxglove "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ross Location: Houston, TX Watch: yourself Posts: 838	Definitively split 50/50.

9 September 2015, 02:14 PM	#100
Watchgeek5000 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Brooklyn USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 1,622	I'll tell you the truth, I'm wearing an 114060 right now and its cool, BUT!!!! I have never worn a submariner date and someone say to me, " O you got the date version...why"? But I have had many people see my "no date" and say " why did you get the no date" in a disappointed tone.

16 September 2015, 02:13 PM	#102
kirksingleton "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,759	I find the date a necessity for me.

16 September 2015, 02:20 PM	#103
thejerseyrock "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Tom Location: New Jersey Watch: Rolex, Omega, AP Posts: 991	If I only wore one - date (because i never know what day it is)…. but if you wear a lot of different watches every week… no date… and if you want the "classic" … no date

24 November 2015, 12:16 PM	#107
Snoop_ "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Arlington Watch: 14270 & 116710BLNR Posts: 159	I went with no date and don't regret it one bit.

24 November 2015, 12:22 PM	#108
Egelber "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Elliott Location: Prosper, Texas Watch: Sub 114060 2019 Posts: 410	Im married so NO MORE DATE NITE!!!! No pun intended 114060....

24 November 2015, 03:26 PM	#109
kopykopy "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Asia Posts: 280	All my Rolexes have No Date. I like the cleaner look as well as I dont have to set the date. However, all my friends who wear rolexes have cyclops. Even my wife commented "why did you buy a no date rolex?" when I got my Sub C No Date. Heck, I love my No Dates. But one fine day it will change when I finally get my Ice Blue Platinum Day Date.

25 November 2015, 09:48 AM	#110
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	Voted date, but love both... __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

25 November 2015, 10:16 AM	#111
Evo6 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: SoCal Watch: BLNR55131675BB58 Posts: 829	The Definitive Ceramic Submariner Date vs No-Date Thread (116610 vs 114060) The original... ImageUploadedByTapatalk1448410589.100760.jpg Although the Hulk has beel haunting my thoughts of late. If this watch existed (it's a color shifted Hulk) It be all the Rolex I'd ever need...

25 November 2015, 12:15 PM	#113
Evo6 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: SoCal Watch: BLNR55131675BB58 Posts: 829	Hope you don't mind, your Hulk pick was a perfect canidate for some Photoshop foollery.

25 November 2015, 12:27 PM	#115
cdnwatchguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 921	Oddly for me... The previous iterations I by far preferred the date version. The newer ceramic versions I far prefer the no date. __________________ Keith

25 November 2015, 12:31 PM	#116
elkaholic "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: ATL Watch: Rolex Posts: 683	In terms of the newest ceramic versions, I prefer the Sub 114060. For some reason it just appears more clean and proportionate to me. It's a toss up for me between the 5 digit Sub date/non-date versions. I've owned the 14060m, 16610 and 114060. I would (and will) have any of the three of them again. __________________ 16570 Exp II White 16220 DJ silver stick 16233 DJ champagne stick

25 November 2015, 06:20 PM	#117
mechanicaltime "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: GMT -6 Watch: 114060 Posts: 212	I really love my SubC. I love it. That said, I would love any sub.

25 November 2015, 06:43 PM	#118
jw0n "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Won Location: Asia Posts: 1,439	I agree that the 14060/114060 has a very clean, balanced look. But, I really enjoy having the convenience of being able to tell the date when glancing down at my wrist. So, being a practical person, I pick date. __________________ Instagram: @itsjw0n

25 November 2015, 08:23 PM	#119
psychokandy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: PG.PJ.SH Watch: Crown.Rose.Shield Posts: 173	I voted for the Classic. 114060. And this is my first Rolex as well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

25 November 2015, 08:47 PM	#120
Malbolge "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Disco Volante Posts: 350	oh wow, i thought the ND would be in the left field, an odd ball. And I would have this nice unique watch... and turns out it is MORE popular than the Date one in the polls. eh... __________________ Rolex Submariner Reference 114060

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)