ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 December 2009, 08:41 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
Am I alone in my OCD re the accuracy of my watches??
I am constantly checking the accuracy of my mechanical/automatic watches against the GMT web site. Always re synchronizing and watching for disparities...I think I may be driving myself crazy.
Am I alone in this? What do you consider acceptable accuracy from your Rolex's? 16610 16700 16713 1601 1500 |
16 December 2009, 08:45 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
You are not alone, but you DO need to loosen up. As long as the watches are within COSC standards (and those standards are actually rather loose, compared to atomic clock standards), then everything is fine.
Go out and have a beer or something!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
16 December 2009, 08:49 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
understand where you are coming from but as Larry suggested, you may want to loosen up and drink a pint.
I have never checked the accuracy of my Rolexes and am not planning on to. If making sure the watch is accurate so you won't miss the train or a meeting, then I think setting the watch 5 mins faster will def solve the problem of potentially being late. Just my 2 pence. :-) |
16 December 2009, 08:54 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
Quote:
Seriously, OP, I think we all probably go through this, but you do have to come to grips with the fact that while mechanical watches are not atomic clock accurate, they are more accurate than most of us will ever need. When you consider the number of seconds in a day, -4/+6 is nothing. |
|
16 December 2009, 08:57 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
oops... Apologies Allan, for some reason I called you Larry.... (iPhone mode does not have the edit function)
|
16 December 2009, 08:59 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Allan
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Watch: Daytona/Sub/GMT/DJ
Posts: 20,323
|
Quote:
I've been called a lot worse, my friend!
__________________
Member: Rolex Keeper's Society "You see, you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself." - Rick Nelson |
|
16 December 2009, 09:03 AM | #7 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
Quote:
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
|
16 December 2009, 09:04 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Allan.
Billy. |
16 December 2009, 09:05 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Allan.
Billy. |
16 December 2009, 09:11 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Allan.
Billy. |
16 December 2009, 09:12 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
16 December 2009, 09:18 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
you know... To be sure, to be sure and.... Yep you got it.. To be sure. :-P
|
16 December 2009, 09:19 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
I used to use a spreadsheet program to time the accuracy of all of my mechanical and quartz watches. Then I had kids. I haven't done it since.
|
16 December 2009, 09:19 AM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
Quote:
Billy
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
|
16 December 2009, 09:51 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: USA
Watch: me go all out
Posts: 1,183
|
|
16 December 2009, 11:01 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
What's acceptable to me is -0/+6 secs a day. I consider that excellent timekeeping.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
16 December 2009, 11:30 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
Thanks. I needed a wake-up call. I just erased my time keeping spread sheet.
|
16 December 2009, 11:39 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 16610 1675 Speedy
Posts: 1,057
|
It used to concern me too. Not a big deal anymore.
__________________
|
16 December 2009, 11:57 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Texas
Watch: 116660 V
Posts: 438
|
I think that your OCD is out of control when you have to count to 27, rub your belly 3 times, wash the dishes and then check the accuracy of your timepieces.
|
16 December 2009, 12:00 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SG
Posts: 192
|
I don't do it everyday.. but every 2-3 days or weekly...........
|
16 December 2009, 12:03 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
I am on my Rolex the most, my IWC next and then my Patek last. I think I care most about the Rolex because it's the most expensive "tool" watch I have (IWC, Breitling and Tag were much, much less), and right now it's getting the most wrist time. With my Patek, as long as it's running and not making me early/late I don't really care because I didn't buy a Patek for the purpose of having an ultra-precise watch, I bought it because having a Patek meant a lot to me even with the understanding that there are many other mechanical watches that are more precise, but they still aren't Pateks.
|
16 December 2009, 03:31 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Nick
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 2 SS Daytonas(W&B)
Posts: 542
|
You are not alone but, like Allan suggested......you need to loosen up a bit! I have only done it once and found that there weren't any issues besides the usual +5 seconds daily, didn't bother me at all.
|
16 December 2009, 03:33 PM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
you're not alone but you won't be there for too long. Most people become less obscessed....
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
16 December 2009, 04:26 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Nothing wrong at all. We pay thousands for our watches so we have every right to expect a high degree of accuracy - within reason, of course. I think the COSC standard is +/- 6 secs a day, so I'm happy once I find my watches performing to around that level.
|
16 December 2009, 04:38 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 318
|
I do do this against the time shown on the morning news programme, I have the TV on each morning and the running seconds just happens to be there, so why not?
It only proves how inaccurate and sometimes erratic a mechanic watch can be. Cheers, |
16 December 2009, 04:45 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Nate
Location: USA
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 273
|
I used to fret all the time, now I dont really worry about it. Its not perfect I think my watch needs a tune up but its close enough
|
17 December 2009, 12:32 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Long Island
Watch: SS Sub Date, TT DJ
Posts: 703
|
Alone...definitely not!
Quote:
OCD's unite!! |
|
17 December 2009, 12:44 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
I am not alone.....
|
17 December 2009, 12:56 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
+1
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
17 December 2009, 12:59 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
|
I reset mine every weekend and am always pleased and amazed at the accuracy.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.