ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 April 2010, 09:00 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Counterfeit watches
Apparently watch counterfeiting isn't a new concept. Read what Ernest Francillon had to say in 1874:
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
14 April 2010, 10:04 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joseph
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: Submariner/Date
Posts: 366
|
|
15 April 2010, 05:03 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred
Location: KY, USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 10,042
|
Thanks Al. An interesting find.
__________________
Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group |
15 April 2010, 07:05 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,417
|
i'm not saying anything
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
16 April 2010, 05:40 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joseph
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: Submariner/Date
Posts: 366
|
I hope my comment wasn't "suggestive" in any way. However, I have given this topic considerable thought. Particularly regarding the lastest replicas. It amazes me how these copies can be as good as "some" are. Years ago, as a police officer, I owned and carried a Taurus PT-90 as a sidearm. At the time Taurus was a "start-up" company that had purchased all of Berreta's old machinery and dies in order to "legally" produce Berreta's now famous model 92, (carried by U.S. and Nato forces). This led me to a "theory", and I reiterate... only a theory, related to all the parts, (except of course for the movement), that are being used to manufacture counterfeit Rolex watches. Every company uses accounting practices that allow for ammortization of machinery and other hardware used in the manufacturing and distribution process. Once these items reach the end of their assigned useful life expectancy they are usually sold or destroyed depending upon there cash or proprietory value. Is anyone familiar with Rolex's policy for disposing of this type of equipment? Now don't misunderstand me... I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but we all know how this crazy world of ours works. It only takes one "bad apple" somewhere in the process who, for financial gain, is willing to look the other way. And before you it some Chinese factory somewhere has this machinery and is using it to produce "clones" if you will. It certainly would help explain the fact that most of these fakes usually share the same serial numbers over and over. Again, I'm not trying to provoke any serious debate or cast any aspersions. Just my .
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.