![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Josh
Location: Kabul
Posts: 8
|
Gmt Master II or Yahtmaster
I am looking at getting my first Rolex. I can't decide on getting a SS GMT Master II or SS/Plantium Yahtmaster. I was wondering the pros and cons of both watches.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
|
GMT.
Always cool and rugged. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,203
|
for me 100% YM
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
GMT for me, multiple timezones, and it's extremely rugged. I believe it sits better on the wrist than the YM, and it can really take a beating.
If it comes down to aesthetics, in my eyes the GMT still wins. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
GMT has a cult style following, and works under any situation. Another plus is no polished links. The Yachtmaster is absolutely gorgeous, but almost too pretty for a sport watch.
Both great choices can't go wrong. Whichever one speaks to you.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
GMT for me...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,742
|
Do you like one a little better? If so why?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Rye
Location: Japan
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,156
|
I'd definitely go with the GMT II. It's a tough watch and you can change the bezel inserts (coke, pepsi, black). Not to mention you can also put it on a jubilee
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
'The Way of a Warrior is based on humanity, love, and sincerity; the heart of martial valor is true bravery, wisdom, love, and friendship. Emphasis on the physical aspects of warriorship is futile, for the power of the body is always limited'- Morihei Ueshiba - Omega 3570.50 (77mil) Rolex 16610 (V) Rolex 1601 (1966) Seiko BM
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
Welcome Josh! For your first Rolex I'd go GMT....
Personally I'm getting a YM next time... ![]()
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Pete
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,607
|
I LOVE my YM but as my first or only Rolex, I don't think it would take the "beating" that a GMT (or a Sub, can't go wrong with Sub) can take.
BUT - there is something about that dial on the YM in the sunlight, I swear I have almost crashed while just staring at the watch and driving! Good luck and enjoy whichever one you pick. -Pete
__________________
SS Submariner K16610 SS Submariner F16610LV SS/P Yachtmaster M16622 SS Black Dial Daytona M116520 SS Explorer II D16570 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Josh
Location: Kabul
Posts: 8
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Hands down.......GMTII
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: miami lakes
Posts: 34
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: miami lakes
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 97
|
i had the exact same dilemma. loved both watches. finally went with the gmt and no regrets. at the end of the day, the ym seemed like a really shiny and expensive sub. also wished the clasp was a little more robust.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
GMT, no question.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
|
I like them both but I'd have to say GMT II for sure. I have the IIc and my son just got a super duper two-tone with jubilee that's a knockout.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,690
|
Do you have other watches in your collection? Both the GMT and YM are awesome....maybe one of them complements your other watches?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
If you're torn between a newer GMTIIc (ceramic bezel) I would prefer it over the YM, why?
Maxi-case New bracelet Ceramic bezel If you're looking at an older GMTII with older type bracelet clasp among other things, then I would go for the YM, I really like the red SH and platinum bezel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Darren
Location: England
Posts: 401
|
Sub then GMTII
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: jon
Location: london
Watch: White Explorer II
Posts: 332
|
whichever you go with you will end up with a great watch, good luck
__________________
Explorer II Polar Zenith Class Elite 18ct Marathon SAR Auto plain dial Casio G-Shock MTG 910D |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,317
|
BOTH??!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! ![]() I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
|
Probably depends on what you are looking for? A daily wearer or a more upscale looking watch.
I personally would choose the GMT for my first. I think it can be worn on almost any situation. (shorts and t-shirt on the beach to a tux) But, if you want more "bling," the the YM! Both great watches! Good luck with your choice. I'm sure you will be happy with what ever you decide to buy.
__________________
Member Number 34171 "Remember: No matter where you go... there you are." Buckroo Banzai _________________________________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Robert
Location: Iowa
Watch: Rolex MilGauss
Posts: 513
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
Get the GMT II first then you'll know what to do later.
Cheers ![]()
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 13
|
GMTII
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Pete
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,607
|
Quote:
Just try to conentrate on the road while looking at this! ![]() -Pete
__________________
SS Submariner K16610 SS Submariner F16610LV SS/P Yachtmaster M16622 SS Black Dial Daytona M116520 SS Explorer II D16570 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
The GMT has, you know - the GMT complication. That's a pretty big "pro."
If you don't care about that feature, then just buy whichever one looks better to you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Michigan
Watch: SS Yachtmaster
Posts: 87
|
I was pressed with the same decision a few weeks ago. I was ready to purchase my first Rolex and was almost positive I wanted the Yachtmaster. However, I always liked the look of the SS GMT and that was my second option. I made sure I looked at both closely over and over again before I made my decision. One of the things I considered was that I already have a nice SS Chronograph with a black face.
At the end of the day I went with the Yachtmaster which I knew I would. I couldn't be happier. It has been 3 weeks now and compared to my other watch this in night and day. The Platinum for me works with everything. I wear suits during the week so it can definitely be dressed up. Yesterday I had on cargo shorts and a t-shirt and it fit well. There are a lot of Rolex watches with a black face which I love. To me the Yachtmaster is a little different. You don't see it all of the time. It looks amazing outside in the sunlight. The bottom line is go with what your gut tells you. If I listened to everyone else I would be waiting on the new Submariner. Regardless, you can't go wrong with either one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.