ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 June 2010, 05:24 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
"Spongy" hack
I've noticed that it is difficult to set the minute hand exactly on the markers of my GMTIIc. The hand seems to "wander" around.
I did not experience this with the 3186 movement of my Explorer II. Is this normal? Fr. John† |
25 June 2010, 05:51 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill
Location: Olden Texas
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 1,941
|
I'm gonna bump this because I dunno and I wanna know.
|
25 June 2010, 06:01 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18
|
I think what you are describing is normal. I assume you want the minute hand to be perfectly align with a minute marker when the second hand is at 12 o'clock? The way I do this is to stop the watch with the second hand at xx:xx:50. Then set the minute hand to perfectly align. Then start the watch when your external time reference (time.gov) shows xx:xx:50). The ten seconds of run time before the top of the minute takes up the slack in the mechanism and the minute hand aligns nicely.
|
25 June 2010, 06:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
Mine doesn't wander but I set the minute hand to the right- most section of the marker and find that the minute hand lines up perfectly after that.
|
25 June 2010, 06:27 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
It's slack in the movement. Interestingly I don't notice it with 15xx movments.
|
25 June 2010, 06:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: NY, USA
Watch: yo self!
Posts: 2,686
|
you can also eliminate slack in the movement by setting forward to the minute, not down. For example. If you want to set to 12:25 I'll bring the watch to 12:20, then move the hand to :25.
__________________
That boy's got the Devil in him. Rolex: I think I'm up to 9?? Omega: Got a few of those too. Breitling: And some of these. |
25 June 2010, 07:47 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Ventura County CA
Watch: TT DateJust 16013
Posts: 428
|
Fr. John:
By "wander around" do you mean that once you set the minute hand and second hand the minute hand's alignment is off a little the same at each minute marker? Or, are you saying it might be a hair behind of some minute markers and hair ahead on others?
__________________
Rolex DateJust 16013 Omega Railmaster 2503.52 |
25 June 2010, 08:35 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
Fr. John† |
|
25 June 2010, 11:58 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: U.S.
Posts: 296
|
Try getting the slack out like TattooedGQ described. Then when the crown is pushed in, the minute hand shouldn't move.
|
25 June 2010, 09:17 PM | #10 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Rolex SubC,GMTIIC
Posts: 966
|
Quote:
I have noticed on my TTSub if I set it on the 12:00 to 6:00 side the minute hand aligns with the minute marks and is a half a mark off on the 6:00 to 12:00 side and visa versa |
|
25 June 2010, 09:27 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,501
|
Hi Fr John,
I have noticed this with both my GMT IIcTT and my Pepsi (both 3186). I have found them to be less twitchy if I give them a full wind before setting. Seems to tighten things up a bit IMO.
__________________
E |
26 June 2010, 03:21 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Bill Hart
Location: Richmond, NY, UK
Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3
Posts: 3,053
|
My GMTIIc is exactly the same, out of all my watches it is the most difficult to set, or at least to get the minute hand to hit the mark each time the second hand reaches 12 o'clock.......there seems to be about 45 seconds spring in the minute hand....if I want to set to 14:45 for example, I move the minute hand to say 15:00 then back it up to 14:44 and approximately 15 seconds....when I push in the crown (or sometimes when I release the back pressure on the crown) the minute hand jumps to 14:45...but it's hit and miss to be honest
__________________
Bill "There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't" TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron |
26 June 2010, 04:42 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Ventura County CA
Watch: TT DateJust 16013
Posts: 428
|
Quote:
Still, "half a mark off" as you describe seems like a lot. One thing I checked first was to be sure the dial appeared well centered. Mine appears perfectly centered so I moved on. I tend to believe every one of these hand assembled watches is a little quirky in some way. The only reason I think I even noticed, besides the fact I'm a bit goofy, is that the 39mm Railmaster has a relatively large dial and an arrowhead minute hand that comes so a needle point so one can notice even half-a-hair . . . if one gets his nose right up to the cyrstal and stares. By the way, on the other issue about setting, I have found that if I stop my second hand at the 56 second mark, align the minute hand and push in the crown (push it in straight, that is) at xx:xx:56 (time.gov), the alginment is perfect . . . well you know, except at the 18 to 23 minute mark.
__________________
Rolex DateJust 16013 Omega Railmaster 2503.52 |
|
28 June 2010, 06:30 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
i dont have problems with the setting to the exact marker of the minute hand. and i do give it a full wind charge.
my problem is the pulling of the crown to position 2 |
20 August 2010, 06:36 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
RSC-Dallas called today to say that rather than turning the minute hand backward to the mark (as I was taught as a child and have done ever since), one should move the minute hand on the GMT IIc forward to the mark.
Apparently this method is peculiar to the GMT IIc because of "the difference in a pinion design". I know this was not the case with my 3186 Explorer II. Oh, well . . . Fr. John† |
19 September 2010, 04:09 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,155
|
I'd like to bump this thread up because I've noticed this issue on my new Sub-C. Is this something that can be fixed by RSC. It's kind of annoying...
|
19 September 2010, 10:13 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,449
|
My Explorer is like that. It's kind of irritating, because I have a Citizen that the hands are motorized and will jump from minute to minute or turn rapidly depending on how fast you turn the crown.
This watch is actually pretty miraculous, even if it has a very busy dial.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.