ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 October 2010, 11:45 PM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,276
|
Evolution of the Sub Date 1680 vs 16610 vs 116610
OK, ok… so I don’t own a 1680 (yet) , so I used my Tudor 76100 instead. From what I understand they share many parts, except for the dial and movement of course.
Enjoy The pearl…… The bezel & crystal……. The lugs…. |
1 October 2010, 11:51 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Nice shots, when you look at it that way, not much has really changed! Although, I still wish the lugs on the 116610 were not so wide.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
2 October 2010, 12:58 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
I agree, there hasn't been THAT much change and all 3 look great. Some people on here make it sound like the new Sub has just turned away from its roots and is an unrecognizable shadow of its former self. I don't get it.
|
2 October 2010, 01:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
Call me a traditionalist, but I really like the flatter profile of the plexi era.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.