The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 November 2010, 12:55 PM   #1
PJS500
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 81
Icon11 Roman Numeral IIII?

Is this too pickey? I am kind of a detail person. Why it that the Roman Dial, very popular, has the incorrect "Roman Numeral" for 4? Imagine if they had to put in a 9 (IX). VIIII? IIIIIIIII? Is that the real reason for the DD2? They needed more room?
PJS500 is offline  
Old 21 November 2010, 02:33 PM   #2
Colnago
"TRF" Member
 
Colnago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Bill Hart
Location: Richmond, NY, UK
Watch: Rlx=3, Tdr=3, Om=3
Posts: 3,053
Almost all watches and clocks with Roman numeral dials use this method to display 4.....arrapently it makes the dial more symetrical....at least that's what I was told....
__________________
Bill
"There's only three kinds of people in this world....those that can count....and those that can't"
TRF's "JJ's" Bar & NightClub Patron
Colnago is offline  
Old 21 November 2010, 02:35 PM   #3
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJS500 View Post
Is this too pickey? I am kind of a detail person. Why it that the Roman Dial, very popular, has the incorrect "Roman Numeral" for 4? Imagine if they had to put in a 9 (IX). VIIII? IIIIIIIII? Is that the real reason for the DD2? They needed more room?
A "kind" of a detail (SIC) person? For watch dials, but not for spelling, eh?
Speed is offline  
Old 21 November 2010, 02:38 PM   #4
rosspanics
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rocky Mountains
Watch: Exp2, Exp1
Posts: 727
Just another reason that I will never buy a roman numeral watch..
rosspanics is offline  
Old 21 November 2010, 03:37 PM   #5
steven.veres
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 152
I was told that they use IIII because going around the dial you will have:

4 consecutive roman numerals using only Is: { I, II, III, IIII }
4 consecutive roman numerals exclusively containing Vs: { V, VI, VII, VIII }
4 consecutive roman numerals exclusively containing Xs: { IX, X, XI, XII }

And there's the symmetry!
steven.veres is offline  
Old 21 November 2010, 04:38 PM   #6
niner niner seven
"TRF" Member
 
niner niner seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven.veres View Post
I was told that they use IIII because going around the dial you will have:

4 consecutive roman numerals using only Is: { I, II, III, IIII }
4 consecutive roman numerals exclusively containing Vs: { V, VI, VII, VIII }
4 consecutive roman numerals exclusively containing Xs: { IX, X, XI, XII }

And there's the symmetry!
this is interesting, i have always wondered but never knew
__________________


16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV
niner niner seven is offline  
Old 21 November 2010, 08:44 PM   #7
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
This question goes back a long way (to the age of sundials, actually). One of the more widely accepted theories is that clocks and watches originally used IIII rather than IV out of respect for the Roman God Jupiter, whose name in Latin begins IV. That, and having the dial "balanced".

http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/49669

http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently...ock-dials.aspx

http://trusted-forwarder.org/elgin/help/roman_IIII.html

Btw, not all Roman dials use IIII:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PP.jpg (16.3 KB, 665 views)
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline  
Old 22 November 2010, 04:33 AM   #8
PJS500
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
A "kind" of a detail (SIC) person? For watch dials, but not for spelling, eh?
Huh? Since I am "kind of a detail person" I googled the phrase "kind of a detail person." There are over 6000 references. Throw in "kind of a detail guy" and you get a couple of thousand more. It is an idiom. What am I missing?
PJS500 is offline  
Old 22 November 2010, 05:07 AM   #9
baxta69
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: davinci
Location: suffolk, uk
Watch: Rolex & Breitling
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colnago View Post
Almost all watches and clocks with Roman numeral dials use this method to display 4.....arrapently it makes the dial more symetrical....at least that's what I was told....
I was told the same thing
baxta69 is offline  
Old 22 November 2010, 06:51 AM   #10
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJS500 View Post
Huh? Since I am "kind of a detail person" I googled the phrase "kind of a detail person." There are over 6000 references. Throw in "kind of a detail guy" and you get a couple of thousand more. It is an idiom. What am I missing?
I didn't quite follow that either. But we could mention "pickey."
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline  
Old 22 November 2010, 07:04 AM   #11
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
Here's what "The Straight Dope" has to say on the matter dating from 1986.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...-instead-of-iv
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline  
Old 22 November 2010, 07:48 AM   #12
PJS500
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art161 View Post
I didn't quite follow that either. But we could mention "pickey."
Got me.
PJS500 is offline  
Old 22 November 2010, 11:15 PM   #13
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
I still love he roman dial!!!
buke45 is offline  
Old 23 November 2010, 03:55 AM   #14
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosspanics View Post
Just another reason that I will never buy a roman numeral watch..
Really?

Just how long is that list..?
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline  
Old 21 May 2017, 05:23 AM   #15
melman
"TRF" Member
 
melman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Mel
Location: Texas
Watch: Rolex Daytona SS
Posts: 98
My wife just asked me about this on hers. Lol! Search and ye will find the answer.
melman is offline  
Old 21 May 2017, 05:44 AM   #16
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Better symmetry with the "IIII"
Tony64 is offline  
Old 21 May 2017, 05:49 AM   #17
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
I noticed this too and always wondered. Does look better with the IIII though now that I imagine it with a IV.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline  
Old 21 May 2017, 06:49 AM   #18
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,053
It visually balances the VIII of the number 8 on the other side of the dial by providing some symmetry to the dial.
Besides, IIII is not incorrect as it's the earliest form of the roman number 4.

Speaking of numerals.
Why is it that the numbers we accept as being Arabic in the western world, actually bear little resemblance to the real Arabic numerals which are more beautiful?
Dirt is offline  
Old 21 May 2017, 07:15 AM   #19
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,254
For as long as there have been watches (and before), this has been a convention.
Cru Jones is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.