The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 March 2007, 10:37 AM   #1
Tomko
"TRF" Member
 
Tomko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa - Canada
Posts: 115
Torn between TT Blue Sub / SS no date Sub / Mid Size YM

Dear TRF Colleagues:

I feel torn in multiple directions...

After a solid six weeks of thinking, I was sure that I wanted a mid-sized Yachtie. I have a smallish wrist and felt that this mid-size looked well scaled to my small bones. I was leaning towards the TT with serti dial because I wanted to show a touch of flash - but no bling, bling.

I just spent the better part of this afternoon with my AD. I have known my salesman for almost 17 years and have a relationship based on trust. He has worked very hard to get me out of the mid-size YM. He thinks that it is just too small and dimunitive on my wrist. He feels that it weakens my image and does not enhance it.

When I look at the mid-sized YM directly on my wrist it looks good to me. But when I see it on, in a full length mirror, it looks a touch boyish.

My salesman wears a TT Blue Sub. He got me to wear his around for a while. It turns out that his is perfectly sized for me. He feels really strongly about this one on my wrist. He says that it speaks of strength and just a hint of attention-grabbing flash. I believe that he has a point. I just find it a little big on me when I look directly at it, and still a touch big in the full length mirror.

I tried the SS no date Sub. I really liked it. I felt that it had better scale on my wrist. I liked its clean elegant look. My salesperson hates it. He says that it has no flash whatsoever, and that it is not even COSC certified. He likened it to a tourist buying an Air King. (No offence to Air King owners - I like them too, but am looking for more at this time.)

What are your opinions?

My criteria are:
  1. a touch of flash; and,
  2. good scale to my smallish 6.5" wrist.

The candidates are:
  • TT mid-sized YM with Serti
  • TT Blue Sub
  • SS no date Sub

Thanks,
__________________
Tomko

Current:
TT LN GMT-Master II 2007
Tudor Oyster-Prince Quartz 1999
Victorinox Swiss Army 1994
Lassale 1987

Retired:
Seiko Quartz 1981
Timex LCD 1979
Timex mini-sub style 1975
Timex 1971

Last edited by Tomko; 31 March 2007 at 07:28 AM..
Tomko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 10:45 AM   #2
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
My salesman wears a TT Blue Sub. He got me to wear his arround for a while. It turns out that his is perfectly sized for me. He feels really strongly about this one on my wrist. He says that it speaks of strength and just a hint of attention-grabbing flash. I believe that he has a point.

My criteria are:
a touch of flash;

The candidates are:
TT mid-sized YM with Serti

TT Blue Sub

SS no date Sub




GET THE TT BLUE SUB!!! IT ROCKS.

I have my blue arabic Air King on right now and can't wait to get mt TT Blue Sub back on. It calls to me...daily. Best Rolex ever in my very humble opinion.
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 11:23 AM   #3
Blue Bull
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
Yes,on the Blue TT Sub No competition

No, on the mid YM

Maybe on the Sub/no date.
Blue Bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 11:26 AM   #4
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Hey Tomko,

Mid-size? NEVER!! Forget the rest, just buy the BEST!!

__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 11:59 AM   #5
Tomko
"TRF" Member
 
Tomko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa - Canada
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Hey Tomko,

Mid-size? NEVER!! Forget the rest, just buy the BEST!!
Thanks JJ. I knew that I could count on you for an unbiased opinion.
__________________
Tomko

Current:
TT LN GMT-Master II 2007
Tudor Oyster-Prince Quartz 1999
Victorinox Swiss Army 1994
Lassale 1987

Retired:
Seiko Quartz 1981
Timex LCD 1979
Timex mini-sub style 1975
Timex 1971
Tomko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 12:03 PM   #6
vh_bu98
"TRF" Member
 
vh_bu98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomko View Post
Thanks JJ. I knew that I could count on you for an unbiased opinion.
I'll back the TT as well. I never liked the Yachtmaster and the SS no date is too plain.
vh_bu98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 12:10 PM   #7
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomko View Post
Thanks JJ. I knew that I could count on you for an unbiased opinion.
Well, Tomko, to be perfectly honest with you, the mid-size is a complete waste of money. For some reason, I dislike that size....which seems neither here nor there.

And between the no-date Sub and the TT Blue pictured above, it's a no contest. Of course, you would be paying much more; but, at the end of the day, if you really want total satisfaction, the Blue Sub is a cracker....and one you'll never get tired of looking at!!

Good luck - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 12:14 PM   #8
Tomko
"TRF" Member
 
Tomko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa - Canada
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Well, Tomko, to be perfectly honest with you, the mid-size is a complete waste of money. For some reason, I dislike that size....which seems neither here nor there.

And between the no-date Sub and the TT Blue pictured above, it's a no contest. Of course, you would be paying much more; but, at the end of the day, if you really want total satisfaction, the Blue Sub is a cracker....and one you'll never get tired of looking at!!

Good luck - JJ
Thanks JJ. You really are da man!
__________________
Tomko

Current:
TT LN GMT-Master II 2007
Tudor Oyster-Prince Quartz 1999
Victorinox Swiss Army 1994
Lassale 1987

Retired:
Seiko Quartz 1981
Timex LCD 1979
Timex mini-sub style 1975
Timex 1971
Tomko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 12:15 PM   #9
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
Without a doubt! The TT Blue Sub!
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 12:18 PM   #10
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomko View Post
You really are da man!
I wish my wife would say that more often.....but when you've touched 60....
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 12:21 PM   #11
colemanitis
"TRF" Member
 
colemanitis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
TT Sub!
__________________
Member #471
colemanitis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 01:17 PM   #12
Thurnau
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 738
I don't know which watch you should get

Out of the three I would get the TT sub.
If you know you already look boyish why get the mid size watch?
A larger watch is fashionable right now.
You already admitted you wanted flash but not bling; the SS no date sub is not all that flashy and the serti dial may be a little blingy. What about a serti yachtmaster?

Does one make you feel more proud than the other? Does it "smile at you"? Are you just settling on his stock? Why not shop around at different places to find the right one you want then go to your trusted AD to buy?
Thurnau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 01:21 PM   #13
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thurnau View Post
I don't know which watch you should get

Out of the three I would get the TT sub.
If you know you already look boyish why get the mid size watch?
A larger watch is fashionable right now.
You already admitted you wanted flash but not bling; the SS no date sub is not all that flashy and the serti dial may be a little blingy. What about a serti yachtmaster?

Does one make you feel more proud than the other? Does it "smile at you"? Are you just settling on his stock? Why not shop around at different places to find the right one you want then go to your trusted AD to buy?
Stop confusing him, my friend!!

Can't you see he's already in love with that picture of my Blue Sub!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 01:23 PM   #14
syahriltaher
"TRF" Member
 
syahriltaher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Real Name: Syahril
Location: Bogor, Indonesia
Watch: Rolex, Omega
Posts: 650
Hi Tomko,

I've got this TT Mid Size YM from my father. It's wonderful and I love it because it's something that my parent gave to me... But if I had the chance to choose I prefer to have a full size...(either a TT YM or TT Sub).

But if you want to see a nice picture of a midsize TT YM, here it is (14 years old and still looks great)...

Regards,
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Yachtmaster.jpg (57.7 KB, 112 views)
__________________
- Rolex RG Daytona 116505 - Rolex SS Submariner "Hulk" - Rolex SS Sky Dweller "Black Dial" - Rolex SS GMT Master II 16710 "Coke" - Rolex GMT Master II CHNR "Rootbeer" TT - Rolex SS Daytona Ceramic 116500LN "Black Dial" - Rolex 126710 "New Batman" 2022 - Rolex SS/WG Datejust 41 126334 "Blue Roman" - Panerai "PAM 88" GMT - Omega New Moonwatch 3861
syahriltaher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 01:27 PM   #15
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,074
As much as I love the TT sub, out of those choices SS sub all the way.

No flash or bling.......? Doesn't need it.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 02:52 PM   #16
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,086
Blue Sub no doubt!
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 02:57 PM   #17
ROLEX4FD
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego
Watch: TT Blue Sub & SDDS
Posts: 105
There is nothing more elegant (in my humble opinion) than the TT Blue Sub. For me - it is THE Rolex signature watch. You won't be disappointed - trust me!!
ROLEX4FD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 03:00 PM   #18
Blue Bull
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLEX4FD View Post
There is nothing more elegant (in my humble opinion) than the TT Blue Sub. For me - it is THE Rolex signature watch. You won't be disappointed - trust me!!
I like that, "The Rolex Sgnature Watch " ..
Blue Bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 03:05 PM   #19
rolexfan21
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16610
Posts: 379
i personally wouldnt buy a sub without a cyclops unless it wassomething like a sea dweller. i wouldnt go with the mid size YM either. I dont like YM's that much neither... blue sub. yeah.
rolexfan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 03:08 PM   #20
veilstylez
"TRF" Member
 
veilstylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: so cali
Posts: 1,253
I too have a small wrist size 6.5in. Just out of experence...I came from a Date 34mm and now at the 40mm full size yachmaster. Its actually perfect for my wrist. I thought at first the 34mm date was perfect but felt a little boyish too. 40mm is big at first for us smaller wrist people its not as big as you think. When I got a 44mm panerai was when I realized that that was too big. But after wearing the panny and going back to the 40mm its was perfect. But if your considering sub then Go with a FULL size TT yachtmaster or the TT Sub. I was thinking of getting the Mid size too and I know now forsure if i did I would have regretted it. I also use to own a mid size Seamaster too which is now too small for me, so its sold. Im never getting a mid size again..except the 40mm panny. ..but trust me youll regret it.

The BTW its all in your fist size not the wrist size. ..if your fist is big than it wont look bad.
veilstylez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 03:20 PM   #21
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
TT Sub, or fullsized yachtmaster. Don't dink around with the midsize stuff.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 03:21 PM   #22
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
The BTW its all in your fist size not the wrist size. ..if your fist is big than it wont look bad.
And just, pray tell, how do you increase your fist size? Just joking
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread

FcB
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 04:50 PM   #23
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablojota View Post
And just, pray tell, how do you increase your fist size? Just joking
If I tell you the secret to that one, then I'm afraid I'll have to kill you, Frank!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 05:01 PM   #24
indra
"TRF" Member
 
indra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 82
I would choose Sub ND coz it suits every occasion. From office to the beach, wearing cuffs without worrying it won't fit etc.

Do you also looked at the Explorer 1? It's 36mm and it has a gorgeous clean look too.

__________________
It's good to be the king...
indra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 05:25 PM   #25
Arturo
"TRF" Member
 
Arturo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Arturo
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: Black GMT ll
Posts: 1,271
Please, go try the TT or the white gold bezel new TOG with the red second hand. I love that watch, and have a tiny bit of regret that I got the LV, although in a Rolex world there will always be this regret because they have it rigged so that one likes another niche a bit so one will feel that kind of melancholy of not having it all. But that sentiment should be ignored. Find what you want and it will satisfy as my LV actually does, but look at that TOG for me cause it is just bitchin handsome on any wrist and moreso on a smaller wrist. I will get one someday.
Arturo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 06:09 PM   #26
santaclaus2100
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Han
Location: Singapore
Watch: TT GMT Master II
Posts: 130
Go for the full 40mm size.

I have a small wrist too, around 6.5 inch girth. But I have been wearing a lot of full sized watches, like Zenith El Primero, Fortis Cosmonaut, Seiko Orange Monster.

And now the TT GMT Master II, root beer. I feel that mid-size is just way too small.

Well, the Orange Monster was a huge watch but it sat on the wrist quite well.

Go for the full sized.
santaclaus2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2007, 06:23 PM   #27
Arturo
"TRF" Member
 
Arturo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Arturo
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: Black GMT ll
Posts: 1,271
The interesting thing about the TOG though is that although the watch face is only 34mm, the rest of the watch makes it look bigger, especially with the white face. It is a definitely handsome watch. I look forward to it as my last.

BTW did you see that film with Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansen...they were hotel guests in Tokyo? That was a platinum President I think he was wearing, and it looked BIG. A good watch can look big.
Arturo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2007, 01:03 AM   #28
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
Have you tried out an Explorer II with with either the White or Black face dials? Thinner and a bit smaller in Diameter than the Sub. May fit your wrist better.

Also the Full size Yachtmaster. tried on teh full size TT and SS on ethe other day, they fit really well. MOre smothed out and thinner than a Sub.
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2007, 07:20 AM   #29
Tomko
"TRF" Member
 
Tomko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa - Canada
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by santaclaus2100 View Post
I have a small wrist too, around 6.5 inch girth. But I have been wearing a lot of full sized watches, like Zenith El Primero, Fortis Cosmonaut, Seiko Orange Monster.

And now the TT GMT Master II, root beer. I feel that mid-size is just way too small.
I just measured my wrist and it is 6.5 inches in diameter. My AD told me to get over it. He's from Spain and he told me that if I have the ganas it doesn't matter what size my wrist is.
__________________
Tomko

Current:
TT LN GMT-Master II 2007
Tudor Oyster-Prince Quartz 1999
Victorinox Swiss Army 1994
Lassale 1987

Retired:
Seiko Quartz 1981
Timex LCD 1979
Timex mini-sub style 1975
Timex 1971
Tomko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2007, 07:27 AM   #30
Tomko
"TRF" Member
 
Tomko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa - Canada
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by indra View Post
I would choose Sub ND coz it suits every occasion. From office to the beach, wearing cuffs without worrying it won't fit etc.

Do you also looked at the Explorer 1? It's 36mm and it has a gorgeous clean look too.

I love that clean look of the Sub no date. Simple, classic, elegant.

The Explorer 1 really fits me nicely, but I don't like numbers on my dial. I prefer indices.
__________________
Tomko

Current:
TT LN GMT-Master II 2007
Tudor Oyster-Prince Quartz 1999
Victorinox Swiss Army 1994
Lassale 1987

Retired:
Seiko Quartz 1981
Timex LCD 1979
Timex mini-sub style 1975
Timex 1971
Tomko is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.