|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 November 2010, 02:18 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 60
|
LV-C Sans Cyclops
Found this a little amusing, its only been out a few months and somebody has already decided to butcher it off and then not want it.
 Saw this in the shop window of a grey dealer in Central London. I wonder how much they're going to try and charge for it without the Cyclops  ps.I didn't go inside to inquire Cheers. |
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:21 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 675
|
No doubt they will try and flog it at a premium as some special edition...
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:27 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Alan
Location: Offshore
Watch: 116610LN 116613LB
Posts: 219
|
could you see where the AR coating ends once the cylops had been removed? I heard that rolex dont put it under the cyclops, maybe just a myth?!
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:27 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rocky Mountains
Watch: Exp2, Exp1
Posts: 727
|
Not on their website...
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:35 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
Removing the cyclop it is visible the AR coting that is under it ...
Frankly speaking I like the cyclops very much (a sort of Rolex "imprinting") and I find them very very useful to read the date ... I'm getting old ...  Engi |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:39 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
I think it looks really cool...but I am probably biased because I wear a Sea Dweller 16600 as my daily!
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:39 AM
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Destin, FL USA
Watch: Outerspace DayDate
Posts: 2,662
|
I like the look. Would not do that to mine, but it might be something Rolex should consider, a SD Hulk!!
Mike |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:40 AM
|
#8 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: TN Valley
Watch: Too many...
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:44 AM
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Alan
Location: Offshore
Watch: 116610LN 116613LB
Posts: 219
|
yeah thats why I asked, thought I could see that too, same shape as where the cyclops used to be
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 02:44 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
|
Sweet! The new anniversary "C-Dweller".
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52 
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 04:46 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: DFW
Watch: 16610
Posts: 558
|
To each his own. They will probably be able to sell it for the same as a regular used LV. There has to be someone else who wants it this way.
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 04:49 AM
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Levi
Location: Romania & England
Watch: Sub C Black
Posts: 568
|
I belive that if you remove the cyclops on your own is a diffrent story, but to buy a Sub C without them, not me,thanks.Rolex without cyclops look fake, unless is SD.
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 05:03 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
I personally like the way it looks without the cyclops. The cyclops can be a pain sometimes because you have to get just the right angle to see the date, even with the ar coating.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis 
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 06:02 AM
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Odd.
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 06:25 AM
|
#15 | |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,960
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 09:40 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 25
|
Not a good move in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 10:32 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 685
|
I'm not a big fan of the cyclops, it looks much cleaner without it.
__________________
Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000-1JF / DW-5040 40th / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 / SNE543P1 |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 10:36 AM
|
#18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Florida
Watch: Hulk, DJ, Bluesy
Posts: 1,890
|
I thought the Hulk was tougher than that? Didn't put up much of a fight!
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 10:49 AM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ♛
Posts: 4,408
|
Doesn't look bad
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 10:53 AM
|
#20 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
|
I think it looks awesome!
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss “A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 10:56 AM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Erik
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 116234, 116710LN
Posts: 936
|
Is it just me, or does it look like you an see the outline of where the cyclops was on the first pic? I don't like this at all btw...
__________________
Submariner 116610LN - Black Dial & Stainless Steel DateJust 116234 - White Stick Dial & Roulette Wheel GMT-Master II 116710LN - Black Dial & Green "Fouth Hand" |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 11:09 AM
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: southern Calif
Posts: 632
|
It probably fell off in shipping, lol.
DW |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 11:27 AM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116610
Posts: 3,455
|
Not a fan. Sub C looks damn good with the cyclops.
__________________
NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE. 
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 12:07 PM
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Seattle
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 256
|
Not for me....I like the cyclops which is an iconic feature of Rolex. All my Rolex watches have them and I rather like the magnification...I have to squint to see the date on my other watches.
Agreed that in the first picture you can see the outline of where the cyclops use to be and not desirable....if you don't want the cyclops, then I would want a clean even surface. Should at least discount it by the price of installing a new sapphire crystal, IMHO. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 12:14 PM
|
#25 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Quote:
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 12:16 PM
|
#26 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Ritchie
Location: Angola
Watch: RExpI
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
I wonder how it looks in person though...I guess it may be the reason it is up for sale. |
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 05:05 PM
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: N/A
Location: N/A
Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC
Posts: 773
|
Demand a Hulk of a discount.
|
|
|
|
|
25 November 2010, 05:15 PM
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aus
Watch: ALL
Posts: 318
|
I think it looks asssome
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
