ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

pacloan · 23 December 2010, 07:46 AM

I would greatly appreciate some help in authenticating this Tudor 7016 I acquired recently.
Bought from a local dealer in SF.
Thanks in advance

blaine mattison · 23 December 2010, 11:14 AM

your dial is TOTALLY incorrect. as for the case i am not liking
what i can see. you have a watch that would be 40 plus years
old and NO WEAR. hmmmm

the number are highly suspect. the style of the letters on the case
back. the pearl on the bezel. the shape of the crown guards on the
back side.

the movement should be a 2483 eta with a base caliber 2461
could you ask for a refund??

by the way come to TRF

springer · 23 December 2010, 11:44 AM

The dial is a fake, no such dial ever graced a Tudor. The Swiss T<25 was not on those watches. And, another clue is the dial looks new. The same goes for the case. The back looks laser etched, and the fonts aren't correct for the numbers.

That's my observations. I can't speak 100% for the movement, but there is enough there to call the watch fake - as my learned friend Blaine noted. I agree with him.

Cannop · 23 December 2010, 12:03 PM

Another small point but on the dial there is normally no gap between the 200m, the equals sign and the 660ft - eg. 200m=660ft not 200m = 660ft.

23 December 2010, 11:44 AM	#3
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,308	The dial is a fake, no such dial ever graced a Tudor. The Swiss T<25 was not on those watches. And, another clue is the dial looks new. The same goes for the case. The back looks laser etched, and the fonts aren't correct for the numbers. That's my observations. I can't speak 100% for the movement, but there is enough there to call the watch fake - as my learned friend Blaine noted. I agree with him. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

23 December 2010, 12:03 PM	#4
Cannop "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Duncan Location: UK Watch: Lots Posts: 443	Another small point but on the dial there is normally no gap between the 200m, the equals sign and the 660ft - eg. 200m=660ft not 200m = 660ft. __________________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "The quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten" - Sir Henry Royce (1863 -1933) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

23 December 2010, 11:14 AM	#2
blaine mattison "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: blaine Location: memphis Watch: my next find Posts: 1,060	your dial is TOTALLY incorrect. as for the case i am not liking what i can see. you have a watch that would be 40 plus years old and NO WEAR. hmmmm the number are highly suspect. the style of the letters on the case back. the pearl on the bezel. the shape of the crown guards on the back side. the movement should be a 2483 eta with a base caliber 2461 could you ask for a refund?? by the way come to TRF

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)