ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

xjeeunitx · 17 April 2011, 07:52 PM

http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-16700-MINT...item4cf68746f3

Holy cow! What in the world happened to this watch? This is just terrible. I hope no one buys this watch...

capote · 17 April 2011, 07:56 PM

Yeah it looks absolutly awful! I didn't know it was possible to create something so ugly looking. It says its a 16700, but the dial is from a 16710. I wouldn't stay in the same country as this watch.

padi56 · 17 April 2011, 08:05 PM

X2. Its just a thin so called ceramic press fit insert would doubt if it would have the complete ball bearing turning bezel mechanism.Myself would not touch it with a 15ft barge pole.

Rolex116520 · 17 April 2011, 08:35 PM

I even doubt there is anything ceramic about it at all. Most likely a polymere lookalike insert . Just weird looking .
The seller does disclose the fact that it is aftermarket .. can we report it just based on that ?

globalmedia33 · 17 April 2011, 08:55 PM

if they can make a fake Rolex, I'm pretty sure they can make a fake bezel insert.

Rolex116520 · 17 April 2011, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by globalmedia33

if they can make a fake Rolex, I'm pretty sure they can make a fake bezel insert.

Well they do that all of the time ..
This is a real GMT and the seller only added an aftermarket bezel and discloses it properly .
Not like he is presenting it as a 116710LN .

Not saying that I appreciate these practices , but Ebay has no reason to pull this listing .

onkyo · 18 April 2011, 12:05 AM

I didn't know a Ceramic bezel was an option back then.....

Too Old · 18 April 2011, 07:38 AM

Isn't a 16700 a Master not a Master II

Jan Davis · 18 April 2011, 07:53 AM

That looks totally screwed.

Tijssan · 18 April 2011, 10:26 AM

EVERYTHING is wrong about that watch...

Good catch

Michael M. · 18 April 2011, 10:48 AM

That's what I call an epic fail.......!

dbphotos · 18 April 2011, 01:24 PM

Its not to my taste, but if someone likes the look and wants it, I have no problem with it. Seller disclosed it properly and it is up to the buyer.

17 April 2011, 07:52 PM	#1
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,462	Ceramic bezel on old model... The swap http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-16700-MINT...item4cf68746f3 Holy cow! What in the world happened to this watch? This is just terrible. I hope no one buys this watch...

17 April 2011, 08:05 PM	#3
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,031	X2. Its just a thin so called ceramic press fit insert would doubt if it would have the complete ball bearing turning bezel mechanism.Myself would not touch it with a 15ft barge pole. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

17 April 2011, 08:35 PM	#4
Rolex116520 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: EEC Watch: Daytona & Deepsea Posts: 2,387	I even doubt there is anything ceramic about it at all. Most likely a polymere lookalike insert . Just weird looking . The seller does disclose the fact that it is aftermarket .. can we report it just based on that ? __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

17 April 2011, 08:55 PM	#5
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	if they can make a fake Rolex, I'm pretty sure they can make a fake bezel insert. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

18 April 2011, 01:24 PM	#12
dbphotos "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: David Location: Texas Watch: your 6! Posts: 898	Its not to my taste, but if someone likes the look and wants it, I have no problem with it. Seller disclosed it properly and it is up to the buyer. __________________ www.DavidBailey.com Rolex DD YG 18238 \| Rolex 1675 Pepsi \| Rolex 14060 \| Rolex Vintage 6694 \| Rolex TT 16013 \| Tudor Tiger 79280P on Shark strap \| a whole bunch of misc watches

17 April 2011, 07:56 PM	#2
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	Yeah it looks absolutly awful! I didn't know it was possible to create something so ugly looking. It says its a 16700, but the dial is from a 16710. I wouldn't stay in the same country as this watch.

18 April 2011, 12:05 AM	#7
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	I didn't know a Ceramic bezel was an option back then.....

18 April 2011, 07:38 AM	#8
Too Old 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Brian Location: Bucks, UK Posts: 1,096	Isn't a 16700 a Master not a Master II

18 April 2011, 07:53 AM	#9
Jan Davis Fake Identity Cyber-Criminal Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Jan Location: Hong Kong Watch: DateJust Posts: 394	That looks totally screwed.

18 April 2011, 10:26 AM	#10
Tijssan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: GMT+8 Watch: this... Posts: 770	EVERYTHING is wrong about that watch... Good catch

18 April 2011, 10:48 AM	#11
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	That's what I call an epic fail.......!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)