ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Kromax · 4 October 2005, 01:54 AM

I am going to purchase the GMT Master II, with the black face and black rotatable bezel. Is the Oysterlock the only band available in stainless/18K gold? (A friend said otherwise, indicating that the Jubilee was an option.)

4 October 2005, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kromax

I am going to purchase the GMT Master II, with the black face and black rotatable bezel. Is the Oysterlock the only band available in stainless/18K gold? (A friend said otherwise, indicating that the Jubilee was an option.)

Yes, the TT jubilee is available on the GMT. It's also available in SS and YG.

Kromax · 4 October 2005, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atomic

Yes, the TT jubilee is available on the GMT. It's also available in SS and YG.

Man, that was quick! Thank you for the information.

Uncle-AJ · 4 October 2005, 02:16 AM

Hi Kromax and welcome to the mad house. We aim to please and greet new members with open arms. I hope you become a regular poster.

Kromax · 4 October 2005, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle-AJ

Hi Kromax and welcome to the mad house. We aim to please and greet new members with open arms. I hope you become a regular poster.

Thank you for the warm welcome.

Followup question: Is the Oysterlock the more common bracelet? I don't recall seeing one with a Jubilee.

Uncle-AJ · 4 October 2005, 02:26 AM

It's definitely the more durable. As far as being more common I can't answer that truthfully but would imagine it to be so, purely based on the models I see in the shops.

4 October 2005, 02:28 AM

The current Oyster bracelet is a double flip-lock. Previous jubilees had a single folding lock, which oyster bracelets also had until about 6-7 years ago.

I know the new jubilee bracelet has an integrated clasp and solid links (on the Datejust) but unsure if this would also be available on the GMT.

padi56 · 4 October 2005, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kromax

I am going to purchase the GMT Master II, with the black face and black rotatable bezel. Is the Oysterlock the only band available in stainless/18K gold? (A friend said otherwise, indicating that the Jubilee was an option.)

Welcome to TRF kromax your question has already been answered,the
oyster bracelet is far more durable that the Jubilee .

Rockrolex · 4 October 2005, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kromax

I am going to purchase the GMT Master II, with the black face and black rotatable bezel. Is the Oysterlock the only band available in stainless/18K gold? (A friend said otherwise, indicating that the Jubilee was an option.)

Welcome to TRF, Kromax. And let me say that your choice of watches is nothing less than supurb. Even if you can get the Jubilee, go with the Oysterlock bracelet. In addition to being the more durable and secure, it is much better suited to a sport watch. The Jubilee works much better with the DJ.

Compare:

with

JJ Irani · 4 October 2005, 03:50 AM

Hi Kromax,

A big welcome to TRF. A choice of Oysterlock bracelet would look better on a sports watch....more durable too.

JJ

maverick · 4 October 2005, 05:00 AM

Welcome and the GMT was the first sports model to offer the Jubilee bracelet but I prefer the Oyster. =) maverick

Seadweller · 4 October 2005, 06:06 AM

Welcome kromax, good to have you here.

dman · 4 October 2005, 01:33 PM

You have gotten tons of good incfo, but I just wanted to also welcome you to TRF!! Hope you can enjoy it and stick around. And remember to post lots of pics when you get your Rolex.

Kromax · 4 October 2005, 10:33 PM

Hey, thanks for the words of wisdom. I am going with the Oysterlock, which I agree, is the best bet for a sport watch. I haven't seen a picture of the GMT with a Jubilee, but I was just curious about it. I think the Oysterlock is "truer" to the theme of the watch. Thanks again. Forum is great.

Earl · 4 October 2005, 10:49 PM

Welcome Kromax and hope you found what you were looking for :o) Your always welcome to post your questions (I'm not sure you will always get a serious answer though!)

dman · 4 October 2005, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Earl

Welcome Kromax and hope you found what you were looking for :o) Your always welcome to post your questions (I'm not sure you will always get a serious answer though!)

LOL Earl, not serious, from us?

JJ Irani · 5 October 2005, 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dman

LOL Earl, not serious, from us?

Hell, I'm still waiting for one!!

mailman · 5 October 2005, 10:51 AM

Welcome to the forum Kromax. Hope you enjoy it here as much as I have in the few days since I've joined.

dman · 5 October 2005, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Hell, I'm still waiting for one!!

Paging Mr. Kettle, Paging Mr. Kettle....it's Mr. Pot and he is calling you black.

JJ Irani · 5 October 2005, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dman

Paging Mr. Kettle, Paging Mr. Kettle....it's Mr. Pot and he is calling you black.

The problem is even when I'm serious, you fellas don't take me seriously!!

dman · 5 October 2005, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

The problem is even when I'm serious, you fellas don't take me seriously!!

LOL!! Hey, it's 4:30 your time, go home and see your family.

JJ Irani · 5 October 2005, 01:33 PM

Just about getting ready to take off!!

dman · 5 October 2005, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Just about getting ready to take off!!

HOLY SHINTO!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just realized that is you, JJ, on that motorbike. OMG!! ROTFLMAO!!!

Kromax · 6 October 2005, 01:34 AM

Hey, while I have you here--quick question. If one were to purchase a used GMT Master II, what is the furthest year back he would have to go to obtain a model that looks identical to the current version? (Looking for TT.)

Earl · 6 October 2005, 01:52 AM

JJ,
Seriously, I look forward to your posts. So, isn't that like being serious?

JJ Irani · 6 October 2005, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kromax

Hey, while I have you here--quick question. If one were to purchase a used GMT Master II, what is the furthest year back he would have to go to obtain a model that looks identical to the current version? (Looking for TT.)

Good question, Kromax.

I know for a fact that the SS GMT-II was first introduced in 1985. At that time the model no. was 16760 (which is now 16710). The old one looks virtually identical to the current one with the exception that it used Tritium and would have the lettering T <25 at the bottom, as against SWISS MADE on the present one.

Not sure when the TT version was introduced, but I know that it came in with the TT Jubilee and the TT Oyster bracelet was also available as an option.

JJ

AJC · 6 October 2005, 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kromax

Hey, while I have you here--quick question. If one were to purchase a used GMT Master II, what is the furthest year back he would have to go to obtain a model that looks identical to the current version? (Looking for TT.)

Hi Kromax,

To look identical a 2000 model because of the SEL (Solid End Link) Bracelet.Also if you really want to split hairs and get a case with no lug holes you would need to get a late Y series and then you are into late 2003 models.

I personally prefer lug holes and a SEL bracelet,but having said that I bought a 1996 T series that doesn't have an SEL bracelet and I am very happy.

Aaron

BTW. If my dates for lug holes and SELs are incorrect,someone please correct me.(It wasa stab in the dark)

6 October 2005, 10:13 PM

I agree with Aaron. While the GMTII was introduced in '85, the addition of SEL was a quantum leap forward in bracelet design and a single defining factor in aging a Rolex, IMO.

4 October 2005, 01:54 AM	#1
Kromax Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Noah K. Location: New York Posts: 43	GMT Master II Bracelet Options I am going to purchase the GMT Master II, with the black face and black rotatable bezel. Is the Oysterlock the only band available in stainless/18K gold? (A friend said otherwise, indicating that the Jubilee was an option.)

4 October 2005, 02:16 AM	#4
Uncle-AJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Real Name: Adrian Location: Bolton, UK. Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 6,844	Hi Kromax and welcome to the mad house. We aim to please and greet new members with open arms. I hope you become a regular poster. __________________ A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10

4 October 2005, 02:26 AM	#6
Uncle-AJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Real Name: Adrian Location: Bolton, UK. Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 6,844	It's definitely the more durable. As far as being more common I can't answer that truthfully but would imagine it to be so, purely based on the models I see in the shops. __________________ A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10

4 October 2005, 03:50 AM	#10
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Hi Kromax, A big welcome to TRF. A choice of Oysterlock bracelet would look better on a sports watch....more durable too. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

4 October 2005, 06:06 AM	#12
Seadweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 750	Welcome kromax, good to have you here. __________________ The Exclusive 4000ft Club.

4 October 2005, 02:28 AM	#7
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	The current Oyster bracelet is a double flip-lock. Previous jubilees had a single folding lock, which oyster bracelets also had until about 6-7 years ago. I know the new jubilee bracelet has an integrated clasp and solid links (on the Datejust) but unsure if this would also be available on the GMT.

4 October 2005, 05:00 AM	#11
maverick Banned Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: maverick Location: Prescott Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,180	Welcome and the GMT was the first sports model to offer the Jubilee bracelet but I prefer the Oyster. =) maverick

4 October 2005, 01:33 PM	#13
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	You have gotten tons of good incfo, but I just wanted to also welcome you to TRF!! Hope you can enjoy it and stick around. And remember to post lots of pics when you get your Rolex. __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

4 October 2005, 10:33 PM	#14
Kromax Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Noah K. Location: New York Posts: 43	Hey, thanks for the words of wisdom. I am going with the Oysterlock, which I agree, is the best bet for a sport watch. I haven't seen a picture of the GMT with a Jubilee, but I was just curious about it. I think the Oysterlock is "truer" to the theme of the watch. Thanks again. Forum is great.

4 October 2005, 10:49 PM	#15
Earl "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Who Me? Location: Northern Virginia Watch: out Posts: 4,616	Welcome Kromax and hope you found what you were looking for :o) Your always welcome to post your questions (I'm not sure you will always get a serious answer though!)

5 October 2005, 10:51 AM	#18
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	Welcome to the forum Kromax. Hope you enjoy it here as much as I have in the few days since I've joined. __________________ JJ

5 October 2005, 01:33 PM	#22
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Just about getting ready to take off!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

6 October 2005, 01:34 AM	#24
Kromax Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Noah K. Location: New York Posts: 43	Hey, while I have you here--quick question. If one were to purchase a used GMT Master II, what is the furthest year back he would have to go to obtain a model that looks identical to the current version? (Looking for TT.)

6 October 2005, 01:52 AM	#25
Earl "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Who Me? Location: Northern Virginia Watch: out Posts: 4,616	JJ, Seriously, I look forward to your posts. So, isn't that like being serious?

6 October 2005, 10:13 PM	#28
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	I agree with Aaron. While the GMTII was introduced in '85, the addition of SEL was a quantum leap forward in bracelet design and a single defining factor in aging a Rolex, IMO.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)