The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 June 2011, 03:52 AM   #1
JustinCNY
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 35
Sub-c question

Is the new sub-c heavier because the bracelet isn't hollow anymore?
JustinCNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 03:54 AM   #2
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
No.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 03:56 AM   #3
R.G
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
Yes, it's true that the Sub bracelet isn't hollow on the ceramic update. I guess that this may contribute to a heavier weight if it is indeed heavier. Perhaps that and the larger case...
R.G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 03:57 AM   #4
HDHNTER
"TRF" Member
 
HDHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
Seems as though that would be a contributor to me.
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER
HDHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 03:58 AM   #5
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
new case/bracelet/clasp i would of thought so! but it didn't feel so
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 04:08 AM   #6
worktolivelife
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
new case/bracelet/clasp i would of thought so! but it didn't feel so
__________________
MEMBER NO.142
worktolivelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 04:11 AM   #7
dannyt
"TRF" Member
 
dannyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Ontario, CA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 229
In all honesty the watch does feel a little heavier, and I think the solid bracelet has something to do with that.
__________________
Rolex 116610LN
Omega 3570.50
Maurice Lacroix Pontos
dannyt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 04:27 AM   #8
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
My "no" was meant that it's not the MAIN reason. I suspect it's case, bracelet, clasp, etc.

So, I'll change my response to "Yes, somewhat." :)
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 04:32 AM   #9
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,930
You'd be talking a maximum of a few grams at most!
I doubt your forearms would grow any larger lifting it around on your wrist....

A well fitted watch is key to comfort regardless of any weight involved!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 04:32 AM   #10
ElPrimero
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecsub44 View Post
My "no" was meant that it's not the MAIN reason. I suspect it's case, bracelet, clasp, etc.

So, I'll change my response to "Yes, somewhat." :)
You mean you got it wrong!!
ElPrimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 05:07 AM   #11
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElPrimero View Post
You mean you got it wrong!!
No. I answered the question correctly. But, I figured to actually add value I'd clarify my response.

My wife doesn't understand that I'm NEVER wrong either... ;)
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 05:12 AM   #12
phampau
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub-C
Posts: 460
combination of clasp, bracelet, case all increase the weight of the sub-c over previous years.
__________________
phampau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2011, 05:37 AM   #13
jnkay
"TRF" Member
 
jnkay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
The solid links don't add weight because they are much thinner than the hollow links. The clasp adds a bunch of weight though, as do the larger and thicker case and (negligably) the ceramic insert.
jnkay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.