ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 July 2011, 02:19 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
|
Nice Vintage below $20k
What would you guys recommend?
Since this one I am buying as vintage won't be enjoyed as much as modern Rolex, I would like something that will hold value for a long period of time, or make little fortune - would be better. What I am really interested in is: 1. I really want watch to be in good shape - I don't want really old models where it is impossible to find hands without rust on them. 2. Preferably below 20k. |
9 July 2011, 02:25 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: GMT+8
Watch: this...
Posts: 770
|
|
9 July 2011, 02:25 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,524
|
The Freccione for sure. You'd have enough money left over for a nice 1680. To be honest, 20k can get you multiple nice vintage pieces :)
|
9 July 2011, 02:34 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
20k is too much, But I'd recommend a yellow gold Day-Date.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
9 July 2011, 02:36 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Quote:
|
|
9 July 2011, 02:38 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
1) Not too old. You can find good looking ones with lug thick enough 2) Attractive Orange GMT hand But how is the value on this watch? I mean, I have seen this ranging from 10K to something near 20K. Unlike modern rolexes, buying vintage requires more thinking. |
|
9 July 2011, 02:39 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
|
|
9 July 2011, 02:47 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
9 July 2011, 02:49 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
|
9 July 2011, 04:26 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Vincent
Location: LON HKG SYD
Posts: 1,236
|
I think your question is quite hard to answer. It is too general.
Buying vintage takes time and needs more thinking as you said. Every vintage piece is unique and has its own unique price. As to rust, yes, just buy something without rust! All the best with your search! |
9 July 2011, 08:58 PM | #11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,993
|
First off--definitely don't buy for any other reason but to enjoy and wear. Second- prices vary greatly depending on the year, type, and condition of each reference. Third- Do your homework and decide what model you like and narrow down from there. Happy hunting!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
9 July 2011, 09:42 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
|
Tough question to asnwer but to make it easier if you were born in the years of the popular sports vintages start with a birth year vintage maybe, that way even if it loose value you wont be sorry.
|
9 July 2011, 09:52 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
What models do you like. You will have to buy something within your budget, however which one makes you smile the most? Focus on your enjoyment, because there are no guarantees that these watches will be as valueable to others a year from now, let alone 10 or 20 years from now. The true value is the enjoyment you will recieve from owning and wearing one of these magnificient time pieces.
Ask yourself why you want one and if it is trully for the right reasons. Then take a look around and find the right one for you. Enjoy your hunt.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
10 July 2011, 02:06 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: J.
Location: Montreal
Watch: Speedmaster Pro
Posts: 232
|
Pretty much anything outside of a Daytona, DRSD, Milgauss, or Milsub I suppose. I wish I had such dilemmas to ponder.
|
10 July 2011, 06:46 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 999
|
|
10 July 2011, 07:14 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Ranger
Posts: 315
|
nice vintage...
anything vintage has more panache, mystique, & style than any modern McRolex. anyone can buy a watch. hunting for & finding a great vintage is where the fun is.
|
10 July 2011, 07:17 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I'd say a 1665, 1655 or 1019 in as good, original and complete condition as possible.
Then wear it well. As for the $20k limit, who's ever bought a watch or a car under budget?
__________________
..33 |
10 July 2011, 07:46 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
But I want to throw my 2 cents in becasue something about this post just frazzled me. First and foremost, men, unlike women, do not have a lot of options to use accessories to identify with. We get a wedding ring, a watch, and unless you can hold on to them, a pen. Anything more than that then you're a pimp, gigilo, or Greek (like me......lol) and you stand out of the crowd like you NEED to show something off. The idea is to be identified, not STAND OUT. That being said, my grandfather told me once about 40 years ago when I was three something I have never forgotten. A man can be distinguishably identifiable by the watch that he wears and the pen he uses to sign his name with. I have a few "nice" watches. A couple of Bulovas a TAG and my favorite is a $250 Swiss Army Officer's watch. I wear that one every day and for just about every occasion. The reason, IT MEANS SOMETHING TO ME.I bought it 20 years ago right before the Gulf War and let me tell you, it's seen plenty of action. I've taken care of it the best that I can. I get it cleaned as much as I change the battery and that's about it. But I love that watch knowing it means more to me than a price tag. And When I hand it down to my son, he'll know, regardless of a fixed price, that it is indeed priceless. Now, I'm about to embark on a Rolex journey. I'm specifically looking for a birth year Rolex. It's going to represent the year I was born.....sure.....and that's going to mean a lot to me. As for the value, well, I'll never be able to place a value on it. Not now, not ever. Becasue in addition to it being my birth year watch, it'll be my unborn son's birth year watch one day (due labor day). And just saying that make me teary eyed. I guess the bottom line is that if you're going to buy a watch, make it mean something to you so you're itentified. Kind of like a dogtag. It doesn't have to have your name on it, but it needs to represent you somehow.Sure I care how much I spend on it, and I do have a budget. But in the long run, when I look at it, I'll know it's something that represents me and not some dollar sign, regardless of the scratches or anything else. Just my 2 cents. Pete Oh, BTW......I sign my name with Montblanc pens........period. |
|
10 July 2011, 08:35 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Clay
Location: Chicago
Posts: 136
|
Very well put Pete, I agree completely.
My first Rolex was a gift from my dad when I graduated college, one that he had worn for nearly 20 years before he gave it to me. It's priceless to me and I will never get rid of it (unless I pass it down myself). But the thing is it could have been a Swiss Army and I would still treasure it as much, it would still represent the same thing to me. Good luck on the search for your birth year, I'm also on a search for mine ('77). |
10 July 2011, 03:36 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: A
Location: SEA
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
so many choices. good luck on your hunt. i enjoy having all my vintages but i only can wear one at a time so i agree you can enjoy having a vintage 'off' the wrist. looking at them makes me smile! cheers, andrew. Sent from my GT-P1000 using Tapatalk
__________________
"Collecting is the only socially commendable form of greed" ~ Gene Shwartz |
|
11 July 2011, 11:43 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
|
For around your budget, I would aim for a 1680 red MK1 or a birth year red sub with B&P or a Double Red SD 1655 without B&P. Both, judging by their current popularity/desireability, would possibly hold value or "might" slightly appreciate in the next 10 years atleast depending on an improving world ecomomy. I say "slightly" increase because most of their future appreciation for the near future atleast has possibly already been built into the current prices unless you get a steal buy. But over the long term there are never guarantees which way these supposed investments might go. Hard to predict what a new generation of young people might love (read up about what happened to Rolex bubblebacks owing to a change in style to larger diameter watches but also read up about how some vintages have appreciated over the years). So make sure you buy for the love of vintage so that if there is ever a writeoff we wouldn't be that sorry or think we might have broken the bank beacuse we would have enjoyed it much like say that fast car in our garage:). If it appreciated, that's a bonus.
Also here's a thread I had attempted to capture some prices in, hope it helps http://www.rolexforums.com/~trfcom/s...d.php?t=180464 |
12 July 2011, 05:52 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: rolexland
Watch: rolex
Posts: 76
|
1655 straight hand for me. But i think 1655 all mk1 with box paper will be hard to come by. DRSD is very nice too but a good condition one will be tough to find under 20.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.