ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Michael M. · 13 July 2011, 04:14 AM

What do you guys think, isnt 2.7mil to late for a MF dial?

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-1680-RED-d...item25656c1b35

diverdick · 13 July 2011, 04:37 AM

Had the dial been a MKII meters first there might be some who would argue it correct but since the dial has the earmarks of a MKI (Long curvy F with Submariner slightly left of the depth rating) I would not expect it on a 2,7XX,XXX case.

Michael M. · 13 July 2011, 04:44 AM

Do you think it could really be a 2.1 mil case, and the owner thought the 1 was a 7?

conrail · 13 July 2011, 05:21 AM

Pics and description like that scream run away, far away!

And I just noticed this feedback, haha:

Quote:

Failed to say boat had been sunk, had sand in the alt. and water in fuel tanks, jkelley2006 ( 21) Jan-19-11 07:11
1996 Jetcraft 20' center console jet with trailer tower (#160521778608) US $7,100.00

If you buy this MF Red Sub, we'll probably be seeing feedback like "Failed to say this watch is put together from fake parts."

Beaumont Miller II · 13 July 2011, 09:25 AM

Conrail that is funny. Michael, yes I think that a 2.7 serial is too late for a meters first dial even though as is commonly heard: "with Rolex nothing is set in stone." I wouldn't want to be the new owner of that watch trying to explain how the dial was correct when those knowledgeable thought otherwise. I would play it safe instead.

Jagatai · 13 July 2011, 09:27 AM

anyone that has a "no returns accepted" policy I run away from.
give this a wide berth.

HL65 · 13 July 2011, 09:27 AM

The seller did such a good job of photographing the watch too! Two words come to mind on this watch: RUN QUICKLY

greekbum · 13 July 2011, 10:03 AM

Seller stated (The dealer stated that someone had "washed" the face, indicating that the glowing numbers part of the dial no longer had its glowing stuff.) To me this says the dial is bad in other words semi worthless.Somebody paid $7750 for a watch with 2 crappy pics and that needs a dial? The watches on the forums that have pictures look like a steal then......lol

matt4hand · 13 July 2011, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

The seller did such a good job of photographing the watch too! Two words come to mind on this watch: RUN QUICKLY

Three words-Run Very Quickly!

pdoukas · 13 July 2011, 10:14 AM

Someone made off over a great deal today and I'm pretty sure it wasn't the buyer.

cruvon · 13 July 2011, 10:17 AM

Looks like somebody already got it for US $7,750.

Michael M. · 13 July 2011, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

The seller did such a good job of photographing the watch too! Two words come to mind on this watch: RUN QUICKLY

I know, I was just curious to hear what other members thought

HL65 · 13 July 2011, 10:45 AM

Somebody got "it" alright!

Racer X · 13 July 2011, 11:09 AM

Michael, you know better! Don't let emotion trump logic.

13 July 2011, 04:37 AM	#2
diverdick "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Dick Clark Location: Los Angeles CA Watch: 1680/8 Submariner Posts: 59	Too late for this dial Had the dial been a MKII meters first there might be some who would argue it correct but since the dial has the earmarks of a MKI (Long curvy F with Submariner slightly left of the depth rating) I would not expect it on a 2,7XX,XXX case.

13 July 2011, 09:25 AM	#5
Beaumont Miller II "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,615	Conrail that is funny. Michael, yes I think that a 2.7 serial is too late for a meters first dial even though as is commonly heard: "with Rolex nothing is set in stone." I wouldn't want to be the new owner of that watch trying to explain how the dial was correct when those knowledgeable thought otherwise. I would play it safe instead. __________________

13 July 2011, 09:27 AM	#7
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,993	The seller did such a good job of photographing the watch too! Two words come to mind on this watch: RUN QUICKLY __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

13 July 2011, 10:03 AM	#8
greekbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Nikos Location: Florida Watch: Rolex GMT 16750 Posts: 8,418	Seller stated (The dealer stated that someone had "washed" the face, indicating that the glowing numbers part of the dial no longer had its glowing stuff.) To me this says the dial is bad in other words semi worthless.Somebody paid $7750 for a watch with 2 crappy pics and that needs a dial? The watches on the forums that have pictures look like a steal then......lol __________________ Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting

13 July 2011, 10:45 AM	#13
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,993	Somebody got "it" alright! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

13 July 2011, 04:14 AM	#1
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Meters First Red Submariner What do you guys think, isnt 2.7mil to late for a MF dial? http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-1680-RED-d...item25656c1b35

13 July 2011, 04:44 AM	#3
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Do you think it could really be a 2.1 mil case, and the owner thought the 1 was a 7?

13 July 2011, 09:27 AM	#6
Jagatai "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Philip Location: NY Posts: 851	anyone that has a "no returns accepted" policy I run away from. give this a wide berth.

13 July 2011, 10:14 AM	#10
pdoukas "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Pete Location: Arizona Watch: ing Duke bball Posts: 1,488	Someone made off over a great deal today and I'm pretty sure it wasn't the buyer.

13 July 2011, 10:17 AM	#11
cruvon "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Australia Posts: 4,689	Looks like somebody already got it for US $7,750.

13 July 2011, 11:09 AM	#14
Racer X "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Dave Location: Unknown Posts: 999	Michael, you know better! Don't let emotion trump logic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)