ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 January 2012, 09:52 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Oz
Watch: es are NICE!
Posts: 243
|
Thoughts on Omega Caliber 3603 Movement
Hello,
I'm considering an Omega Aqua Terra Chronograph GMT with the 3603 movement. I like how this movement has the 3 sub-dials as opposed to the 2 sub-dials of the new 9300/9301 movements (if and when they come to this particular watch). From what I hear, the new movements based on the caliber 8500 are a lot better then the old Omega movements, being completely in-house etc. However, I really like the look of the older version with 3 sub-dials. Any thoughts on whether the old 3603 movement is any good? Or should I wait to see how the new Aqua Terra Chronograph GMT will look, when it comes out? Thanks a lot. |
12 January 2012, 11:47 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
It's an evolution of the cal. 3313, which has had well documented reliability problems earlier on in its life. However, more recently, these problems seem to have been resolved, and, in the worst case scenario, you have a three year warranty to fall back on.
It is quite an uncommon movement in the Omega range, only being used on the Broad Arrow GMT and De Ville Chronoscope GMT, neither of which are particularly well known, so you will be getting a niche product with a lot of value for money. The looks of the watch are pretty striking as well, although you do need big wrists to pull it off - on my wrists, the watch was too big for me to handle. There is a Chrono GMT movement based on the cal. 9300 slated in the future, but when this will appear is unclear as of yet. It might come out at this year's Baselworld show, it might not, and even then, Omega may choose not to use it in the Aqua Terra immediately. The current Aqua Terra Chrono without the GMT function is still utilising the cal. 3313, so I can't see them overhauling these models in the immediate future. My advice is if you like the watch how it is now, then go for it. It will be a robust and striking addition to any collection, and the number of features you get on it for the money is quite simply staggering Hope this helps, Chris |
13 January 2012, 11:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Oz
Watch: es are NICE!
Posts: 243
|
Thanks, GMT Master, that's some great info.
From which year onwards would you say that the 3603 movement issues appear to have resolved? I'm currently planning on buying new, but if a good deal on a pre-owned happens to pop up, I would seriously consider also. Cheers. |
13 January 2012, 11:36 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Quote:
|
|
14 January 2012, 07:13 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Oz
Watch: es are NICE!
Posts: 243
|
That's reassuring to know! Would be a real shame if the watch had a dodgy movement as it's a really good looking piece. Thanks for your help.
|
28 January 2012, 05:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Oz
Watch: es are NICE!
Posts: 243
|
Well, here it is, arrived Friday. Excuse the poor iPhone photography.
Very happy with it and love the white dial and the blue lume. :) |
28 January 2012, 05:48 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Illusive Man
Location: NYC
Watch: Omega Worldtimer
Posts: 670
|
Sick, I love that watch
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.