ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Bluelume · 21 January 2012, 08:20 AM

Hello, I am new to the forum. I am really looking forward to Basel 2012 and expect to see the new 114060M Ceramic.

What do you guys think of this picture I made? That would be my dream Sub.
Sub ND with Ceramic Bezel and the new Explorer II case.

BoomerSooner · 21 January 2012, 08:21 AM

I like it!

SaddleSC · 21 January 2012, 08:21 AM

Looks great to me! It is a cool twist to put it in a 42mm case, but it would have to be totally different than the EXP II case to account for the Triplock crown. If we do see a 114060M this year, I think it will most likely be in a 40mm supercase.

Gharddog03 · 21 January 2012, 08:26 AM

42mm for me and I'm sold.

dddrees · 21 January 2012, 08:45 AM

Welcome to TRF.

I can hear the complaints now. Geez it cost $$$$ for a Sub ND. I sure wish they hadn't done any updates.

Grumpy Badger · 21 January 2012, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaddleSC

Looks great to me! It is a cool twist to put it in a 42mm case, but it would have to be totally different than the EXP II case to account for the Triplock crown. If we do see a 114060M this year, I think it will most likely be in a 40mm supercase.

Copy that.

I'll stick with my old-Skool 14060m, though... Viva Los Lug-Holes!

Lion · 21 January 2012, 08:46 AM

Personally I would like to see Rolex keep the Sub ND as is.......

dddrees · 21 January 2012, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lion

personally i would like to see rolex keep the sub nd as is.......

x2

Bruno C · 21 January 2012, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

x2

x3

JIFF1975 · 21 January 2012, 09:54 AM

I think it looks great but I don't see any difference with the 40mm sub case...

nauticajoe · 21 January 2012, 09:57 AM

Looks good to me.

Mosco · 21 January 2012, 09:59 AM

If it goes into a 42mm case, I will be all over it. However, it'll destroy the sales of DSSD.

brownbear · 21 January 2012, 10:06 AM

warren G. · 21 January 2012, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruno C

x3

x4

Jannal · 21 January 2012, 10:34 AM

GradyPhilpott · 21 January 2012, 10:40 AM

I'm sure glad I've got mine already.

I don't have to sweat future updates at all.

Rolex can do with the Sub what they will now and it will affect me not one whit.

In my opinion, I already own the perfect Sub.

Andad · 21 January 2012, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosco

If it goes into a 42mm case, I will be all over it. However, it'll destroy the sales of DSSD.

Do you think Rolex would compromise sales of its biggest single sports seller 116610 with a 42mm 114060 Greg?

Mosco · 21 January 2012, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

Do you think Rolex would compromise sales of its biggest single sports seller 116610 with a 42mm 114060 Greg?

I don't think the Sub C would be compromised at all - seems like there are two distinct schools of thought when it comes to Subs. Some like the date function, and others prefer the symmetric, clean dial. I don't find many people deciding between, say a 16610 and a 14060 - typically their minds are made up. I do, however, see more and more folks having a hard time deciding between the ceramic GMT II and a Sub...

Mickey® · 21 January 2012, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bluelume

Hello, I am new to the forum. I am really looking forward to Basel 2012 and expect to see the new 114060M Ceramic.

What do you guys think of this picture I made? That would be my dream Sub.
Sub ND with Ceramic Bezel and the new Explorer II case.

I like the case!!! It's not the new "Luggy" one...

karmatp · 21 January 2012, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gharddog03

42mm for me and I'm sold.

X2, I would buy the first one at my AD.

SS Oyster · 21 January 2012, 11:55 AM

I gotta say ... looks great! Especially if it had lug holes.

FX44 · 12 February 2012, 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nauticajoe

looks good to me.

+1

GuyC · 12 February 2012, 03:37 AM

I think the ND sub should be left as is.....

Toivonen · 12 February 2012, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bluelume

Hello, I am new to the forum. I am really looking forward to Basel 2012 and expect to see the new 114060M Ceramic.

What do you guys think of this picture I made? That would be my dream Sub.
Sub ND with Ceramic Bezel and the new Explorer II case.

imho that pic simply show us how could rolex had done better their new ceramics submariner only preserving the old style lugs instead the wider ones...

unfortunately i think that this pic will remain only a dream,the new no date will be exactly the 116610 without the cyclope..

karmatp · 12 February 2012, 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gharddog03

42mm for me and I'm sold.

X2, I love it. I have been holding out for that watch for a bit now, my fingers are crossed for a 42mm Sub.

I sold my Sub C because I don't like the case, the Explorer II case is nice and with the 21 mm bracelet, it's proportions are perfect.

eric23 · 12 February 2012, 05:54 AM

Wecome to TRF! and Congrats!

impalass · 12 February 2012, 06:48 AM

Love my old 14060 as is, hope they don't change a thing.

I have been able to resist the ceramic offerings up until now, but a 114060 may prove to be irresistable.

vukotab · 12 February 2012, 06:49 AM

I think that Sub ND is already perfect watch, and the things I like the most about it are it`s down sides. I mean, it have some sort of vintage charm, not very common in modern watches!

Great artwork, BTW!
Welcome to TRF!

z32turbo · 12 February 2012, 09:07 AM

Looks good. Should make for an interesting Basel if it happens.

GradyPhilpott · 12 February 2012, 09:11 AM

That would add an easy $1000 to the price of an already perfect watch.

The picture itself is great, but there's no good reason to mess with the 14060M.

21 January 2012, 08:21 AM	#3
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	Looks great to me! It is a cool twist to put it in a 42mm case, but it would have to be totally different than the EXP II case to account for the Triplock crown. If we do see a 114060M this year, I think it will most likely be in a 40mm supercase. __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

21 January 2012, 08:45 AM	#5
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	Welcome to TRF. I can hear the complaints now. Geez it cost $$$$ for a Sub ND. I sure wish they hadn't done any updates. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

21 January 2012, 08:46 AM	#7
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	Personally I would like to see Rolex keep the Sub ND as is....... __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

21 January 2012, 09:59 AM	#12
Mosco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Greg Location: Cincinnati Watch: I like to... Posts: 18,567	If it goes into a 42mm case, I will be all over it. However, it'll destroy the sales of DSSD. __________________ Instagram - @CaliberSwiss *“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson*

21 January 2012, 10:34 AM	#15
Jannal "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 685	__________________ Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000-1JF / DW-5040 40th / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 / SNE543P1

21 January 2012, 08:21 AM	#2
BoomerSooner "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Watch: Explorer Posts: 794	I like it!

21 January 2012, 08:26 AM	#4
Gharddog03 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Genaro Location: Fresno Ca. Watch: R O L E X Posts: 4,466	42mm for me and I'm sold.

21 January 2012, 09:54 AM	#10
JIFF1975 Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: The Hague Watch: SDDS, 116610LV Posts: 384	I think it looks great but I don't see any difference with the 40mm sub case...

21 January 2012, 09:57 AM	#11
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Looks good to me.

21 January 2012, 10:06 AM	#13
brownbear "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Danny Location: georgia Watch: it Bub Posts: 1,334

21 January 2012, 10:40 AM	#16
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	I'm sure glad I've got mine already. I don't have to sweat future updates at all. Rolex can do with the Sub what they will now and it will affect me not one whit. In my opinion, I already own the perfect Sub. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

21 January 2012, 11:55 AM	#21
SS Oyster 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 9,202	I gotta say ... looks great! Especially if it had lug holes.

12 February 2012, 03:37 AM	#23
GuyC Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Illinois Watch: 14060M sub Posts: 38	I think the ND sub should be left as is.....

12 February 2012, 05:54 AM	#26
eric23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Calgary Posts: 9,595	Wecome to TRF! and Congrats!

12 February 2012, 06:48 AM	#27
impalass "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: Toronto, Canada. Watch: SD / LV / Daytona Posts: 2,089	Love my old 14060 as is, hope they don't change a thing. I have been able to resist the ceramic offerings up until now, but a 114060 may prove to be irresistable.

12 February 2012, 06:49 AM	#28
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	I think that Sub ND is already perfect watch, and the things I like the most about it are it`s down sides. I mean, it have some sort of vintage charm, not very common in modern watches! Great artwork, BTW! Welcome to TRF!

12 February 2012, 09:07 AM	#29
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	Looks good. Should make for an interesting Basel if it happens. __________________ Instagram @z32turbo

12 February 2012, 09:11 AM	#30
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	That would add an easy $1000 to the price of an already perfect watch. The picture itself is great, but there's no good reason to mess with the 14060M. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)