ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RX0-Unicorn · 7 March 2012, 10:48 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ESKmhfXAtU

I just spot this video on Youtube. At first, I don't like it much. But the turning of Bezel can adjust date and local time is amazing. One of the best design is the month and the recognition of 30 and 31.

drockadam · 7 March 2012, 10:57 PM

Fantastic!! I really like the Everose Gold one with the brown strap!

GradyPhilpott · 7 March 2012, 11:00 PM

Okay!

That helps to make sense of the watch and it sounds like a masterful movement with a lot of capabilities.

Those who longed for more complicated movements should be pleased, although I don't think this was the kind of grand complication they had in mind.

So, while a few minutes ago, I was quite flabbergasted, now I see the light.

It is quite ingenious. It is quite functional. It is not a grotesquely large watch. It is an elegant design and it is will be very expensive.

What I thought might be a "fail," may just be the most interesting and useful watch for a limited demographic to emerge from Rolex in a very long time.

It's on the website:

http://www.rolex.com/en/rolex-watche...-dweller-movie

Dan Pierce · 7 March 2012, 11:06 PM

I'm more than happy with my GMT.
dP

witch watch · 7 March 2012, 11:08 PM

Check the vid of Tiger trying it on to get a better look of it
http://youtu.be/3IimcIc4_Lo

Also Roger Federer
http://youtu.be/-xtBbL5IgBA

gregmoeck · 7 March 2012, 11:09 PM

looks better on the video, probably cost 10K

gregmoeck · 7 March 2012, 11:10 PM

slick tiger woods

esm · 7 March 2012, 11:10 PM

some nice youtube clips. thanks for the link

dddrees · 7 March 2012, 11:12 PM

Thanks for posting.

I think the GMT inner ring still looks a bit funky and the month indicator is a bit unusual but kind of neat.

I do like that it includes an annual calendar though.

dddrees · 7 March 2012, 11:12 PM

Thanks for posting.

I think the GMT inner ring still looks a bit funky and the month indicator is a bit unusual but kind of neat.

I do like that it includes an annual calendar though.

dddrees · 7 March 2012, 11:12 PM

Thanks for posting.

I think the GMT inner ring still looks a bit funky and the month indicator is a bit unusual but kind of neat.

I do like that it includes an annual calendar though.

mjclark32 · 7 March 2012, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregmoeck

looks better on the video, probably cost 10K

same here, but I'm thinking it's going to be a bit more than USD10k

gregmoeck · 7 March 2012, 11:16 PM

that new daytona is stunning for sure.

Like To Watch · 7 March 2012, 11:39 PM

Thanks for sharring.

bodybump · 7 March 2012, 11:40 PM

Impressive movement!!! This is what Rolex are good for...ADVERTISING!!!

DDG · 7 March 2012, 11:43 PM

I think it needs winding crown lugs & some kind of rotating bezel. It looks more like a dress watch.

SaddleSC · 7 March 2012, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregmoeck

looks better on the video, probably cost 10K

It is only available in solid gold and has an extremely complex movement. A better guess would be closer to the $34,000 USD mark.

padi56 · 7 March 2012, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dan pierce

i'm more than happy with my gmt.
Dp

x2

mikkemus23 · 7 March 2012, 11:56 PM

Roger Federer Approveshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xtBb...feature=relmfu

Oyster Junkie · 7 March 2012, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by witch watch

Check the vid of Tiger trying it on to get a better look of it
http://youtu.be/3IimcIc4_Lo

Also Roger Federer
http://youtu.be/-xtBbL5IgBA

They both like it because they are paid to like it. Plus, they got their Sky-Dwellers for FREE.

Ceramic · 8 March 2012, 12:19 AM

Nice watch, but definitely not my cup of tea.

Keeperoftime · 8 March 2012, 12:22 AM

I'll admit the video makes the watch a bit cooler...

Java · 8 March 2012, 12:25 AM

If it came in SS I would order one now. I don't think there is much future in paying MRSP for a gold model.

I think is will be a long time before we see it in SS.
Nice to see a Rolex Annual calendar, and a whole new movement.

floater156 · 8 March 2012, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keeperoftime

I'll admit the video makes the watch a bit cooler...

x2

mdtddd2007 · 8 March 2012, 12:45 AM

After looking at the video. I like that white gold version. Is gonna be in 15k easy.

azguy · 8 March 2012, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregmoeck

looks better on the video, probably cost 10K

$10k

remember, only on WG, YG and RG, more like $20,000 ++

Xeloragemo · 8 March 2012, 01:59 AM

I think the following will improve the styling:
A) Centralising the 24 Hour Disk, will make the Dial more balanced.
B) Have rome for Full Numerals all around the dial.
C) Moving the Red Triangle Marker to the inner disk with the Triangle turned upside down.

What do other members think?

SS Oyster · 8 March 2012, 02:28 AM

In solid 18kt gold ... my guess it starts at $31,999

Launch Mini · 8 March 2012, 02:32 AM

With those complications, in gold, I would peg it at $50k or more considering a President is $30+

gwalker · 8 March 2012, 02:36 AM

The video makes it much better IMO. Everyone, including me, is upset because it's not what we thought it would be. By the time it gets released there will be a long waiting list. Guess Rolex was making more complex watches when I started a thread on it 2 days ago (I'm not claiming I guessed it, just a lucky question.) Too bad all those "inside sources" saying a new Pepsi was WRONG. ROFL

7 March 2012, 10:48 PM	#1
RX0-Unicorn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Jimmy Location: Hong Kong, NYC Posts: 200	Sky Dweller Commerical/Film http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ESKmhfXAtU I just spot this video on Youtube. At first, I don't like it much. But the turning of Bezel can adjust date and local time is amazing. One of the best design is the month and the recognition of 30 and 31.

7 March 2012, 10:57 PM	#2
drockadam "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: Pepsi. Posts: 5,749	Fantastic!! I really like the Everose Gold one with the brown strap! __________________ - Adam Instagram: @GMTSUBTIME

7 March 2012, 11:00 PM	#3
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	Okay! That helps to make sense of the watch and it sounds like a masterful movement with a lot of capabilities. Those who longed for more complicated movements should be pleased, although I don't think this was the kind of grand complication they had in mind. So, while a few minutes ago, I was quite flabbergasted, now I see the light. It is quite ingenious. It is quite functional. It is not a grotesquely large watch. It is an elegant design and it is will be very expensive. What I thought might be a "fail," may just be the most interesting and useful watch for a limited demographic to emerge from Rolex in a very long time. It's on the website: http://www.rolex.com/en/rolex-watche...-dweller-movie __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

7 March 2012, 11:06 PM	#4
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,166	I'm more than happy with my GMT. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

7 March 2012, 11:12 PM	#9
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,251	Thanks for posting. I think the GMT inner ring still looks a bit funky and the month indicator is a bit unusual but kind of neat. I do like that it includes an annual calendar though. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

7 March 2012, 11:08 PM	#5
witch watch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Scotland Watch: Milgauss GV Posts: 1,201	Check the vid of Tiger trying it on to get a better look of it http://youtu.be/3IimcIc4_Lo Also Roger Federer http://youtu.be/-xtBbL5IgBA

7 March 2012, 11:09 PM	#6
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	looks better on the video, probably cost 10K

7 March 2012, 11:10 PM	#7
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	slick tiger woods

7 March 2012, 11:10 PM	#8
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	some nice youtube clips. thanks for the link

7 March 2012, 11:16 PM	#13
gregmoeck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Maui Watch: Patek Posts: 2,032	that new daytona is stunning for sure.

7 March 2012, 11:39 PM	#14
Like To Watch "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Sydney Australia Posts: 1,196	Thanks for sharring.

7 March 2012, 11:40 PM	#15
bodybump ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Oscar Location: Florida Watch: Me!!! Posts: 23,233	Impressive movement!!! This is what Rolex are good for...ADVERTISING!!! __________________

7 March 2012, 11:43 PM	#16
DDG Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Dennis Garrett Location: Land of Oz Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 405	I think it needs winding crown lugs & some kind of rotating bezel. It looks more like a dress watch.

7 March 2012, 11:56 PM	#19
mikkemus23 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Eirik Location: Norway Watch: Rolex/Omega/PAM Posts: 1,160	Roger Federer Approveshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xtBb...feature=relmfu

8 March 2012, 12:19 AM	#21
Ceramic Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: David Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 273	Nice watch, but definitely not my cup of tea.

8 March 2012, 12:22 AM	#22
Keeperoftime "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Jeremy Location: Louisiana Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,732	I'll admit the video makes the watch a bit cooler... __________________ As a man is, so he sees. As the eye is formed, such are its powers. William Blake

8 March 2012, 12:25 AM	#23
Java "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Tim Location: Bangkok Watch: Lots Posts: 521	If it came in SS I would order one now. I don't think there is much future in paying MRSP for a gold model. I think is will be a long time before we see it in SS. Nice to see a Rolex Annual calendar, and a whole new movement. __________________ You don't buy a great watch to tell the time, any more than you would buy a fast car because you're in a hurry.

8 March 2012, 12:45 AM	#25
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,785	After looking at the video. I like that white gold version. Is gonna be in 15k easy.

8 March 2012, 01:59 AM	#27
Xeloragemo "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Kai Location: London, UK Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 73	I think the following will improve the styling: A) Centralising the 24 Hour Disk, will make the Dial more balanced. B) Have rome for Full Numerals all around the dial. C) Moving the Red Triangle Marker to the inner disk with the Triangle turned upside down. What do other members think?

8 March 2012, 02:28 AM	#28
SS Oyster 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 9,183	In solid 18kt gold ... my guess it starts at $31,999

8 March 2012, 02:32 AM	#29
Launch Mini "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Real Name: John Location: Canada, eh Watch: can I? Posts: 6,240	With those complications, in gold, I would peg it at $50k or more considering a President is $30+ __________________ Something witty to go here. Member # 293

8 March 2012, 02:36 AM	#30
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	The video makes it much better IMO. Everyone, including me, is upset because it's not what we thought it would be. By the time it gets released there will be a long waiting list. Guess Rolex was making more complex watches when I started a thread on it 2 days ago (I'm not claiming I guessed it, just a lucky question.) Too bad all those "inside sources" saying a new Pepsi was WRONG. ROFL

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)