The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 September 2007, 08:12 AM   #1
lostsub
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Big D
Watch: 116520 , SD
Posts: 99
Durability of the bezel

I bought an SD after about 2 weeks of owning the SS GMT II ceramic.
What are you guys' take regarding the durability of the ceramic bezel? Yes...I know it should be VERY DURABLE, but I am not about to get a hammer and test it out... I know the old bezel with aluminun insert are very good at taking abuses, but I just found myself being extra careful with this ceramic bezel and that's one of the reason I went back and bought the SD for the aluminun bezel.
Also the new bigger font of the ceramic... in my opinion...look very un-Rolex like. Too close to the look of the Tag F1 watches.
BUT, it's just my own opinion, I know there are lots others don't share it at all...No hard feeling to you all...
lostsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:14 AM   #2
txrob779
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 488
Do you have a pic of the GMT.....I am really liking that watch
txrob779 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:14 AM   #3
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Well, the aluminium bezel INSERT can be changed easily for low $$$ and the bezel itself should last you a lifetime.

The ceramic is said to be virtually unscratchable, but I suspect it it is not shatterproof. And if you by accident destroy the bezel, then it will be a very costly affair to have it exchanged. But in normal everyday use it should last you a lifetime like the standard bezel.

__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:23 AM   #4
lostsub
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Big D
Watch: 116520 , SD
Posts: 99
I had tried to take pictures of my watches for many times, and both of my POS Sony Digital can't take close up never mind macro. So that's why I had not posted any pictures of my watches...
We are going to Disney FL. in 6 weeks time and we are looking into getting a Nikon Dxx soon, sooooo it will come...
The funny things is that I had owned and operated a photo lab from 1987 to 2003 and because everything turned to digital so that I closed/sold the photo lab. I still have a Nikon F4 sitting in my closet with lenses from 24mm to 500mm...
lostsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:24 AM   #5
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,675
lost,

You got this backward...You are supposed to be telling us about the durability of the ceramic..

I can tell you...My aluminum bezel inserts scratch and can be dented..

Now, wear that GMT for a while, then take a good loupe and tell us, in detail, about the size, depth, and their extent. Only then can we turn around and give you our expert, and unlimited, advice...

Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:27 AM   #6
lostsub
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Big D
Watch: 116520 , SD
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
lost,

You got this backward...You are supposed to be telling us about the durability of the ceramic..

I can tell you...My aluminum bezel inserts scratch and can be dented..

Now, wear that GMT for a while, then take a good loupe and tell us, in detail, about the size, depth, and their extent. Only then can we turn around and give you our expert, and unlimited, advice...


Maybe I should hammer and chisel out a piece of ceramic to see...

On my old sub, I did changed the insert twice, and they were about $100 each time.
lostsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:28 AM   #7
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,320
I'm very curious to see how the ceramic bezel holds up to the bumps and knocks of everyday life. I understand that they are virtually scratchproof but ceramic, in my mind, seems like it would be somewhat brittle and subject to cracking or chipping. Any anecdotal stories out there?
Letsgodiving is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 08:35 AM   #8
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
The ceramic insert is said to be extremely scratch resistent and will not fade over time as the aluminum insert was prone to do. Will it? I think it's way to soon to tell.
Rolex indeed had problem with early bakelite inserts on the 6542 and changed to metal after a year or so. My feeling is the ceramic will indeed prove to be very durable, but if it should break it will certainly be much more expensive to replace....time will tell.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2007, 11:32 AM   #9
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
I think the ceramic bezels will be fine. I'm fairly certain that Rolex would think about this aspect of brittleness in the intended application, considering that its watches are sold for use around the planet.

There will likely be stories about breakage, but I don't think that ceramic would fade nearly as quickly as coloured metal (esp the Pepsi bezel) wold do.

That said, I saw the SS this weekend. I find the font size a tad large for my taste, but the relfective quality of the ceramic bezel is dynamite. Like a remarkable black liquid in suspension.

Beautiful.

C
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2007, 12:14 AM   #10
DaveN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Watch: GMT II TT 116713
Posts: 133
I posted about my ceramic bezel's brush with a diamond ring. My watch got wacked big time by a friend's diamond. I believe that their may be a small nick from the impact but without a loupe I'm not certain. I'm sold on ceramic, the old style bezel would haver been toast.
DaveN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2007, 12:23 AM   #11
Alcan
"TRF" Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostsub View Post
I know the old bezel with aluminun insert are very good at taking abuses,
Yep, they sure are!

__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2007, 12:27 AM   #12
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
I recently banged my TT GMT II 116713 watch pretty hard on a metal object while working. The Gold rim of the Bezel, right at the edge where it is next to the Ceramic Bezel, has some small dings on it. But there is amazingly not any marks or dings at all on the Ceramic Bezel!!

Also, since the ding the watch has still been extremely accurate. First couple of weeks was loosing 1-2.5 seconds a day. Watch I guess is now settled in as for the last week have been spot on!!!!!
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.