![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 479
|
14060M no-date Sub - need AD recommendation
Now that the 14060M no-date Submariner has been discontinued, I am thinking about purchasing a new one, if available. I know we have many great pre-owned Sub sellers here on the forums (and I may go this route) but if any of you know of a USA-based authorized dealer that you would highly recommend, please let me know (PM is fine if that's your preference).
Also, for those that own a 14060M no-date, what are your thoughts on the bracelet and clasp? I like the lug holes, clean dial, and throwback style but some have suggested that the lack of solid end links and different clasp make this model less desirable than other Subs, such as the classic 16610 Sub-Date. I haven't compared the two, so would appreciate your input. John |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: nope
Location: S of Mason-Dixon
Watch: NDSub/PAM176/R1931
Posts: 262
|
I once wore a friends fake rolex, and I have to say, the bracelet on that was more substantial than the hollow linked bracelet on the 14060.
That said, I love my 14060m. The hollow bracelet is so light weight that the watch is very comfortable to wear for long periods of time. I like this minimalist aspect of the watch. The clasp is thin, but lightweight and when secure, short of the spring bars breaking, the watch isn't going anywhere. I love the 14060m, it is THE iconic sports watch. ![]() Like Levi's 501, Coca-Cola, Rayban aviators or wayfarers, Porsche 911... its got history and timeless presence. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ny
Watch: sub-c Date
Posts: 1,326
|
SWISSLUXURY.COM has the 14060 for 5500
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dennis
Location: L.I./N.Y.
Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M
Posts: 2,769
|
I love the bracelet. Light weight, good looking, easy to ditch/don. Has protected many a Rolex for many years from falling off the wrist. More that strong enough for the job.
________________________ XLVI Super Bowl Champs NY Giants |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
The classic bracelet is great but it does have one design flaw: there are more removable links on the 12 o'clock side, so if you've got small wrists and you remove all or most of the links, the clasp will be off-center. The remedy is to remove one of the permanent links that Rolex should have made removable in the first place. The removal process is somewhat medieval and is probably best left to your watchmaker. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
The bracelet and clasp is light but that just makes it extremely comfortable. It is one tough watch, lets face it, it is the ultimate sport watch for over 60 years.
Best of luck with the search. ![]()
__________________
My grails: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Kyle
Location: Virginia
Watch: Changes often
Posts: 266
|
I've had mine for about 2 years and I find the bracelet to be very comfortable. It's definitely on the lighter side, but all in all am very happy with it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
|
No issues with the bracelet. Comfortable and light and wears well.
Wasn't too impressed with the bracelet at first in comparison with the one on my Seamaster Pro though now I think it's quite a bit of engineering - light and strong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: DB
Location: :noitacoL
Watch: :hctaW
Posts: 6,703
|
The bracelet on the 14060m has been proven over many years of use. Durability of the design and materials should never be a concern.
It is a great watch, with a simple and timeless design, IMO. If you like it, buy with confidence you will enjoy it for many years to come. As for where to buy - I'd check the TRF For Sale section here. Many respected and long-time sellers.
__________________
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,223
|
Have to agree don't know why today that many think that heavy, more depth rating etc is always better afraid that's not always the case.Now when you think of the original sub 50 plus years ago with its light riveted bracelet,and yes there are still quite a few of those around today.After the change to the oyster bracelets as we know today even with a SEL now that was not introduced to the date sub till 2000.So there must be quite a few million Rolex watches in this world without a SEL bracelet and still going strong.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
I have the 14060M and it's the perfect watch. I met a guy with the new ceramic Sub (first one I saw in person) and he let me try it on. It was a very nice watch, definitely heavier, it looked a little bigger but when I put my 14060M back on my wrist it felt so much better. I'm so glad I have this watch. ![]()
__________________
Submariner 114060 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 518
|
One more note, check out the Cape Town diamond website, you can buy a very nice pre owned or new 14060M with a lifetime warranty. I can vouch for them.
__________________
Submariner 114060 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,613
|
PM sent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
I've yet to go to any AD and not see a ND sub. They are everywhere and I hit up ADs a lot. Just look at ADs next to you. They will be there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 479
|
Thanks for all the input and advice. I can see that the 14060M is appreciated by those that own them and for its connection to Rolex history, with its clean dial, lug holes, comfort, light-weight, and time-tested durability. I know this wasn't a huge seller for many ADs over the past few years, given the popularity of Sub-Dates, GMTs, and other popular Rolexes, but can't help but think this is an iconic watch that will stand the test of time.
Regarding finding an AD, shirtguy mentioned swissluxury.com. Their prices are great, but this is clearly a different business model from buying new from an AD or pre-owned from one of the sellers here on the forums. Controversial, no doubt. What do you all think of this approach? Anyone else bought a Rolex or other watch from them? I'm still trying to find an AD but thanks for the suggestions so far. John |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.