ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 May 2012, 04:10 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Watch: Tudor 79190
Posts: 366
|
Just picked up an Oyster Royal--couple questions on the dial
Hey everyone, I just picked up this Rolex Oyster Royal on a rivet bracelet. I love it and I'm planning on using it as my daily wearer after I get it serviced. I've got a couple questions regarding the dial, but first, the pics:
The reference number is 6426, the endlinks are marked 57, and the serial number is a 3 million. I believe the serial number dates it to around 1970-72. But the dial is just marked "SWISS" at 6, not "T SWISS T." That makes me wonder if it's an older 1950s dial with radium lume that someone inserted into a later watch? Next question: I suspect the dial was re-lumed at some point, because there is a lume dot at 12, right on top of the crown's middle coronet. I don't think Rolex would've done that, right? Okay, last question. I'm thinking of having all of the lume stripped off of the dial and hands, and then having luminova applied on the hands and on the dial from 1 to 11, but NOT on the crown at 12--which I think will give it a more "correct" look. I'd love to hear opinions on that idea. |
13 May 2012, 05:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
Can you post a higher resolution photo of the dial? I suspect it is a refinished dial (not merely relumed), but would like to see more detail before a final judgment.
If you expose the dial to a bright light few a few seconds, and it lights up like a Christmas tree and stays lit for awhile, then the lume is most likely recent (luminova). The hands look like they have the original lume. However they are dauphine and more consistent with late '50s-early '60s style, not 1972 which would be baton hands. So I suspect they are older hands put onto a newer watch.
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
13 May 2012, 06:31 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Watch: Tudor 79190
Posts: 366
|
Sure, here's a closer shot of the dial. The lume is totally dead--I was thinking it was re-lumed with tritium years ago, but again, these are just guesses on my part. But who knows, maybe Rolex really did put lume at 12 like this at some point.
|
13 May 2012, 08:12 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Not sure if it's refinished but I think it might be relumed.
|
13 May 2012, 09:47 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Watch: Tudor 79190
Posts: 366
|
|
13 May 2012, 02:20 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
I'm not sure if the dial is original, perhaps it is (except for the lume), but the dial and hands are definitely an older style than the early '70s. Perhaps the case had been replaced at a service.
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
14 May 2012, 08:32 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,287
|
Nice watch. Enjoy it.
|
14 May 2012, 10:11 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Delaware
Watch: Tudor 79190
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
Thanks! The idea of sending it out for service already makes me miss it. Love these little manual-winds. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.