ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 September 2012, 03:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Looking for Thoughts on Next Purchase - Cartier vs. IWC
I have been going back and forth for awhile on my next purchase and "just get both" unfortunately is not an option.
I have narrowed it down to 2 pretty different watches. The Calibre De Cartier with white dial on a strap and the new IWC Pilot 3777 on a strap. For the Cartier, there is something about the white dial that I love but cannot put my finger on it. The detailing is truly remarkable and I am a big proponent of in-house movements. I know the history of Cartier and watches is a bit murky but they seem to be moving in the right direction. For the IWC, I have always been a sucker for pilot watches and while not a 3717, I still see this as a "classic" pilot watch. The only thing that really gives me some hesitation is the price tag for a Valjoux movement given that IWC no longer puts the pieces together in-house but relies on ETA to build to their specs. Something about this just bothers me for some reason. I realize these are completely different options but any opinions or thoughts are very much welcome. Also, just to add, the Cartier would be the only white/silver dial watch in my collection. Both will be the only "strap" watches in my collection as the rest are on bracelets. I do already have more of a "dress" watch that is a black dial. I would like to be able to wear my new purchase with a suit to work (typically 3-4 times per week) but as I said, do have another option if the situation requires it. Thank you in advance for any input. |
30 September 2012, 12:11 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Marcus
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: 5512TheRealMcQueen
Posts: 57
|
I have both on my "long list" of watches I hope to own. I have the CDC ranked much higher than the Pilot, but that's because I dont really have a dress watch. I find the CDC to be very elegant with its black roman numerals on that white dial. Their inhouse movement is a great step towards improving the brand, even the watchsnob has changed his opinion of Cartier. Its worth mentioning that I currently don't have any white dial watches... yet.
The pilots are my favorite line of IWC. I love how they're informal and won't attract much attention, but also knowing it's amazing watch that desrves to be respected at the sametime. Like the CDC, the 3777 is at a great price point. For some reason I thought the new 3777 is now completely inhouse? Anyways, like you said two very different watches that are almost impossible to compare astecically, but since I have both watches on my list I thought I'd respond with my opinions. Getting both is always an option! Lol! Just depends on how long you're willing to wait for the other. |
30 September 2012, 12:59 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
Tough choice. The Cartier is close, but the big XII on the dial bugs me. Something about the 3777 dial looks out of balance. Not sure why...maybe because I always loved the 3717.
I'd probably pick the IWC because I'm sure either one would be flipped eventually & I assume the IWC would sell more easily. |
30 September 2012, 10:17 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
I will go
|
1 October 2012, 01:21 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
As to the specific pieces you mentioned, I'd probably go with the IWC just because they are among my favorite watchmakers, even if their chrono is still an outsourced base movement. An alternative is to wait a couple of years until more of their pieces have in-house movements, though that may send prices up.
However I cannot respond to one of these threads without offering a couple of suggestions of my own, so bear with me... I would also consider the IWC Portuguese hand-wound (if you're OK with a manual wind watch); it's quite stunning. If you wanted to spend a bit more (though it may be too much) the Portuguese 7-day is also a beautiful piece. Thinking way outside of the box, if IWC would do the swap, and you'd be OK with having the swap done, consider the Ingenieur Vintage in stainless with the silver dial from the platinum version substituted in. A final suggestion, though again the price is a little bit higher (though discounts usually better) would be the JLC Master Chronograph. Not sure if the styling is to your liking, but it seems a blend of the two pieces you're considering. I would consider it another level of watchmaking to either of the other two, though. |
1 October 2012, 01:54 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
IWC is a great brand!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
1 October 2012, 02:08 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
2 October 2012, 07:22 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
|
|
3 October 2012, 05:48 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
|
|
3 October 2012, 05:36 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Been choosing between the Calibre (in black) and an Ingenieur 3227-01, myself.
One thing about Cartier though, women seem to love it. My wife absolutely loves the Calibre for me. Most probably it's because Cartier have made a name for themselves in jewelry and women's watches. So, they know which buttons to push when it comes to women. But, between the pilot and the Calibre, I'd go with Cartier since it has the in-house movement. I've kind of stopped even looking at ETA equipped watches that cost more than $1,000. Let's say the movement from ETA costs $200, even $400, how can they charge $4-5,000 for the whole watch? I don't know, it just doesn't compute for me. Breitling and Omega already make their own movements now and their watches cost less than that.
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
4 October 2012, 02:04 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
|
|
4 October 2012, 02:17 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Also, speaking of Omega, I was at the Chicago boutique last week and tried on the new planet ocean on a strap. Loved it. Now I'm torn between 3 watches. |
|
4 October 2012, 03:09 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETA_SA |
|
4 October 2012, 04:35 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Cartier's in-house starts at $7100, Omega at around $5500 or $8k for a chrono, Breitling is at $7K for a chrono, a datejust II with smooth bezel is 7K and so on. To tie all of this to my original post, it is the lack of an in-house movement in the IWC that is giving me hesitation about purchasing that particular model. While there is a pilot with an in-house movement, the $10K price tag is not justifiable in my personal opinion and I do not care for the slate dial. It is cool looking in person, but to me personally, is more of a novelty I would likely grow tired of relatively quickly. |
|
4 October 2012, 05:39 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
|
4 October 2012, 09:31 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
4 October 2012, 09:45 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 272
|
They are both beautiful watches, no doubt. If it were my decision I would pass on the IWC but only because multi date windows really bug me. Yes, I understand if it is the first then yesterday was the 31st and tomorrow is the second. But even in that case I'm only wrong 4x a year.
|
4 October 2012, 11:21 PM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
This is the last one (regular and Spitfire): http://www.authenticwatches.com/iwc-...l#.UG2MzUJgNSU http://www.authenticwatches.com/iwc-...l#.UG2NA0JgNSU And two generations ago (but only available on a bracelet from this dealer): http://www.authenticwatches.com/iwc-...l#.UG2NNkJgNSU These guys also have the Spitfire UTC from two generations ago; an absolutely beautiful piece (albeit I prefer the regular dial to the Spitfire): http://www.authenticwatches.com/iwc-...l#.UG2NWkJgNSU |
|
6 October 2012, 04:35 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Just an update - went back to take some more looks yesterday and I think I have knocked the Cartier out from consideration. It was surprising since I have been looking at this watch in person and online repeatedly for about the last 10 months.
But yesterday was the first time I actually had them try and fit the watch for me and it just wouldn't work. The watch would not sit in the middle of my wrist and would not sit flat even though I have flat wrists. This has never been a problem with any other watch I own. And unfortunately, I do not care for this watch at all on the metal bracelet. |
6 October 2012, 04:57 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Watch: AP,PP,Rolex
Posts: 46
|
The Calibre is actually the next piece that I am looking to get, but then again that's what I said before the 312 and then again before my DJII.
Just curious as to what type of discount you were able to find on the Calibre as I was thinking of going the preowned route as my usual AD does not carry Cartier |
6 October 2012, 06:23 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
I'll shoot you a PM. |
|
6 October 2012, 08:51 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
In my case, the fit was actually one of the things that attracted me to it. Tried on the Ingenieur on strap and it didn't look too good. Hoping to find a steel bracelet version so I can have a proper comparison. But even then, poor fit on strap is a big negative in my book. Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
6 October 2012, 12:18 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Nice Cartier
|
6 October 2012, 12:35 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Yup definite winner from Cartier. Top of my list at the moment.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
6 October 2012, 04:22 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
cartier
|
7 October 2012, 07:08 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wearing DJ or OP
Posts: 133
|
I say get the pilot. As a woman, I prefer to see a guy wearing an IWC, it's not that common and IWC makes beautiful watches especially in leather straps. May I suggest the IWC Portuguese Chronograph as well?
|
7 October 2012, 02:16 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
I do like the 2 dial chrono but am not a fan of the dial choices. I think they need to make the sub dials stand out a bit more.
|
8 October 2012, 06:37 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
And in spite of the price difference, I'd recommend saving up for the 7 day version in lieu of the chrono (or buying pre-owned if you like that route). The case is much cleaner without the chrono buttons (and more polished in general) and the movement is so much more unique.
|
9 October 2012, 01:08 AM | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
9 October 2012, 02:23 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 436
|
I have considered it - just don't really care for the slate dial. It's nice and really cool looking but I see myself getting tired of it within a year.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.