ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 November 2012, 05:17 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
Just wondering about one thing (DSSD)
As I can't help myself but to look at the Rolex catalog trying to convince myself that I really should stop wanting/purchasing what's in there, I came across the page repeatedly where the DSSD is portrayed... And something on that page always bothered me. I couldn't put the finger on it initially but once I noticed, it couldn't have been more obvious. It is the date.
The DSSD is a watch on which everything is oriented and optimized for the purpose of deep diving. It is as function-driven as no other watch and nothing has been compromised... Or has it, because one got to wonder... Does one really need to sacrifice a lume marker in order to know what the date is, all while diving in the Mariana Trench? It sort of seems incoherent... Or is it just me?
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
15 November 2012, 05:29 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1,515
|
It's a marketing gimmick.
We know that most Deepsea owners don't dive to crazy depths with them and so do Rolex. Showing some pictures of it deep underwater has a better effect than showing a picture of David Beckham wearing one courtside at a Lakers game. Most GMT owners aren't pilots, most sub/DSSD owners aren't divers and most Daytona owners aren't race car drivers. Every Rolex line has a corresponding activity which has long lost the need for the assistance of a high priced mechanical watch. These activities use very precise digital equipment now. They know that and we know that but I still like the way they market their watches. I like thinking of my Sub as a divers watch instead of what it is, a piece of jewellery. |
15 November 2012, 05:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
Yeah, nothing wrong with living vicariously through my watch :)
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
15 November 2012, 05:33 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
I think when it really comes down to it, Rolex SD wearers are going to be checking their watch for the date, more often than diving in the Mariana Trench - catch my drift? :) |
|
15 November 2012, 05:38 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
You make a good thought provoking point.
Maybe it's like some high performance cars which are marketed as track ready yet docile enough to double as a daily driver with all the creature comforts. I guess with the DSSD you have a watch you can take down to the Mariana Trench, yet it's still practical enough to wear everyday because it has a date function? |
15 November 2012, 05:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
|
Date on a DSSD is like having a SatNav in a Ferrari...not an problem.
__________________
'I am easily satisfied with the very best' - Winston Churchill |
15 November 2012, 06:00 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
It's just you. In fact the lack of that said marker is also an easy orientation reference for the dial. Also, underwater isn't the only use the watch, we don't live there. We first have to live a life on land where eventually you a make a plan to go diving.
Any true diver or anyone with employment under water spends a fraction, minuscule amount of their life in water compared to land. With that, I want the date function, wouldn't buy the watch without it. |
15 November 2012, 06:02 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
try a 114060 for size... that may be the compromise.
|
15 November 2012, 07:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
I did and I really liked it... If I didn't want to go for a white EX ll as my next watch, the 114060 might have been the one on top of my shortlist.
Anyhow, I still think in an effort of purity, a dateless DSSD might have been nice. Fully understand the day to day advantage of having the date function, but still. After all, the Daytona and EX I don't have date functions either.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
15 November 2012, 07:38 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
|
i need the date on a watch. i always forget... :)
|
15 November 2012, 07:38 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sweden
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15
|
When you're doing a saturation dive (the only place you really need a DSSD), and are stuck in the compression chambers for over one month, it might be nice to know what day it is :)
|
15 November 2012, 08:30 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: JASON
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Watch: 116660
Posts: 183
|
Kahler is correct. The DSSD Is more of a saturation diving watch, than a watch for recreational dives. Most of the time spent in a typical saturation dive, is spent in a dry decompression chamber (enter date function). Additionally... no one is diving the Mariana's Trench; no watch needed.
|
15 November 2012, 10:06 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: everywhere
Posts: 252
|
Good point.
Since you mentioned, maybe place the date window at the 4:30 or 1: 30 location could have served better purpose? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.