ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cdnyc · 23 January 2013, 01:50 PM

Fellas, please provide some 2012 version Jumbo enabling.
Thanks

kilyung · 23 January 2013, 01:53 PM

Oh that's a dangerous request!

kilyung · 23 January 2013, 01:55 PM

thomaspp · 23 January 2013, 02:47 PM

Name: IMG_8609.jpg
Views: 1229
Size: 76.0 KB

Name: IMG_8600.jpg
Views: 1223
Size: 50.2 KB

Name: DSCN0758.jpg
Views: 1227
Size: 83.3 KB

consider yourself enabled... go get one!

travisb · 23 January 2013, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Oh that's a dangerous request!

[IMG]http://i1040.photobucket.com/albums/b401/kilyung/AP/15202/BCE2D923-C117-4B65-B7EC-10B5E6A6920F-534-00000121081314FF.jpg

Flawless!!

yonggoh · 24 January 2013, 12:05 AM

TSW · 24 January 2013, 02:08 AM

Really need enabling with the stunning 15202?

cdnyc · 24 January 2013, 05:48 AM

Fantastic pics!
It really looks to me like the thinner profile of the Jumbo's case/bezel vs the deeper profile of the 15300 case/bezel makes the Jumbo's dial look a couple millimeters wider than the 15300. Do you guys find that too?

Submarino · 24 January 2013, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdnyc81

Fantastic pics!
It really looks to me like the thinner profile of the Jumbo's case/bezel vs the deeper profile of the 15300 case/bezel makes the Jumbo's dial look a couple millimeters wider than the 15300. Do you guys find that too?

Yes!

Submarino · 24 January 2013, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yonggoh

Amazing shot!!!! Wow!

cdnyc · 24 January 2013, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdnyc81

Fantastic pics!
It really looks to me like the thinner profile of the Jumbo's case/bezel vs the deeper profile of the 15300 case/bezel makes the Jumbo's dial look a couple millimeters wider than the 15300. Do you guys find that too?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Submarino

Yes!

I'm totally shocked by it. If the 15300 is 39mm, it's like the 15202 looks about 41mm (or conversely if the 15202 is 39mm, it's like the 15300 is 37mm) when they're side-by-side. (I realize both are actually 39mm.)
To me this is one of the most salient differences between the appearance of the two, when looking at them from a few feet away. But I haven't seen much talk about it.

v5cog · 24 January 2013, 08:11 AM

The more I see these models..... The more beautiful they get..... But which one should I get?????

kilyung · 24 January 2013, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by v5cog

The more I see these models..... The more beautiful they get..... But which one should I get?????

Really depends on your tastes. Do you need a quick set date or second hands? Do you prefer slimmer more classic design? Can't go wrong with either but my money would be on the 15202.

v5cog · 24 January 2013, 08:27 AM

The white dial with second hand appeals the strongest I guess, but I'm torn on the two styles of gold rotor in the display back.... Both are stunning... Which does your have mike?

kilyung · 24 January 2013, 08:39 AM

15202

15300

kilyung · 24 January 2013, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by v5cog

The white dial with second hand appeals the strongest I guess, but I'm torn on the two styles of gold rotor in the display back.... Both are stunning... Which does your have mike?

When you wear the watch, you don't see the rotor so IMO that's peripheral. Now the dial color is a critical factor. On that basis I'd get the 15x00 white dial or an older jumbo with white dial.

yessir69 · 24 January 2013, 10:23 AM

I hate you guys.

R_Ongjoco · 24 January 2013, 10:33 AM

Stupid question, but what is a Jumbo? A Royal Oak that is 39mm? I assume the 15400 isn't considered a Jumbo?

yessir69 · 24 January 2013, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R_Ongjoco

Stupid question, but what is a Jumbo? A Royal Oak that is 39mm? I assume the 15400 isn't considered a Jumbo?

A Jumbo is a 5402 model that was introduced in the early 70s. In 2012 AP made a model that is very close to the original - the 15202.

Here is a very well written article on the subject.

http://people.timezone.com/library/extras/201012035459

cdnyc · 24 January 2013, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R_Ongjoco

Stupid question, but what is a Jumbo? A Royal Oak that is 39mm? I assume the 15400 isn't considered a Jumbo?

A Jumbo is a Royal Oak with the 2121 caliber movement (the movement from the very first Royal Oak back in 1972). They're often called the ultra-thin Royal Oak, since they're a couple mm thinner than the 15300s and 15400s. There's always one self-winding Royal Oak reference in the current AP offerings that has this movement, the current version is the 15202. There are other distinctions between Jumbos and 15300s/15400s, but that's probably the most predominant distinction. (Experts, let me know if I'm off on any of this.)

R_Ongjoco · 24 January 2013, 11:50 AM

Thanks Kevin and cdnyc81 for the info!

EdChoi · 24 January 2013, 11:53 AM

.

cdnyc · 24 January 2013, 12:26 PM

And visually perhaps the most obvious distinction is that Jumbos don't have a seconds hand, whereas the 15300/15400s do have a seconds hand (a function of the 2121 caliber movement vs the 3120 movement).

There are a number of other less obvious differences, including the one I mentioned above which had me kind of excited -- the Jumbo seems to wear a little wider because of its thinness. appreciate your feedback on that Hal. hoping to know if others find this to be as noticeable a difference as I do too.

thomaspp · 24 January 2013, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdnyc81

A Jumbo is a Royal Oak with the 2121 caliber movement (the movement from the very first Royal Oak back in 1972). They're often called the ultra-thin Royal Oak, since they're a couple mm thinner than the 15300s and 15400s. There's always one self-winding Royal Oak reference in the current AP offerings that has this movement, the current version is the 15202. There are other distinctions between Jumbos and 15300s/15400s, but that's probably the most predominant distinction. (Experts, let me know if I'm off on any of this.)

Thanks for the education; and there i was posting my newly acquired 15400...

cdnyc · 24 January 2013, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomaspp

Thanks for the education; and there i was posting my newly acquired 15400...

None of us would ever mind seeing pics or your beaut on any thread -- congrats on the amazing pickup!

Hairdude1 · 24 January 2013, 02:24 PM

Awesome pics all!

tifosi · 25 January 2013, 12:21 AM

I am becoming more and more fascinated with this model. This is dangerous. The 15400 is just within my reach, but I can forget about the 15202.

thomaspp · 25 January 2013, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdnyc81

None of us would ever mind seeing pics or your beaut on any thread -- congrats on the amazing pickup!

Thanks for the kind words.

v5cog · 25 January 2013, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

15202

15300

Thanks of the info and pics mike, I agree the case back is not really seen when wearing it, but I'd love to look at the movement when I can, albeit in photo as none of mine have display backs at the mo... Do you have both models mike ?
I must admit I'm leaning towards the white dial..... But I do love the decorative rotor of he 15300. Decisions decisions !!

R_Ongjoco · 25 January 2013, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by v5cog

Thanks of the info and pics mike, I agree the case back is not really seen when wearing it, but I'd love to look at the movement when I can, albeit in photo as none of mine have display backs at the mo... Do you have both models mike ?
I must admit I'm leaning towards the white dial..... But I do love the decorative rotor of he 15300. Decisions decisions !!

Then get the white 15300

23 January 2013, 01:50 PM	#1
cdnyc "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Cory Location: NY Posts: 681	2012 Jumbo enabling Fellas, please provide some 2012 version Jumbo enabling. Thanks

23 January 2013, 02:47 PM	#4
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,137	consider yourself enabled... go get one! __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

24 January 2013, 02:08 AM	#7
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Really need enabling with the stunning 15202? __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

24 January 2013, 11:53 AM	#22
EdChoi "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Eddie Location: VA Posts: 356	. __________________ instaGram: ehDchoi

25 January 2013, 12:21 AM	#27
tifosi "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Russ Location: Southern NJ Posts: 5,760	I am becoming more and more fascinated with this model. This is dangerous. The 15400 is just within my reach, but I can forget about the 15202. __________________ Russ

23 January 2013, 01:53 PM	#2
kilyung "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,950	Oh that's a dangerous request!

23 January 2013, 01:55 PM	#3
kilyung "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,950

24 January 2013, 12:05 AM	#6
yonggoh Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Malaysia Posts: 126

24 January 2013, 05:48 AM	#8
cdnyc "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Cory Location: NY Posts: 681	Fantastic pics! It really looks to me like the thinner profile of the Jumbo's case/bezel vs the deeper profile of the 15300 case/bezel makes the Jumbo's dial look a couple millimeters wider than the 15300. Do you guys find that too?

24 January 2013, 08:11 AM	#12
v5cog Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Colin Location: london Watch: Audemars Piguet Posts: 548	The more I see these models..... The more beautiful they get..... But which one should I get?????

24 January 2013, 08:27 AM	#14
v5cog Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Colin Location: london Watch: Audemars Piguet Posts: 548	The white dial with second hand appeals the strongest I guess, but I'm torn on the two styles of gold rotor in the display back.... Both are stunning... Which does your have mike?

24 January 2013, 08:39 AM	#15
kilyung "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,950	15202 15300

24 January 2013, 10:23 AM	#17
yessir69 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Kevin Location: Tornado Alley Posts: 3,304	I hate you guys.

24 January 2013, 10:33 AM	#18
R_Ongjoco "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Ron Location: BayArea/SanDiego Watch: AP Posts: 427	Stupid question, but what is a Jumbo? A Royal Oak that is 39mm? I assume the 15400 isn't considered a Jumbo?

24 January 2013, 11:50 AM	#21
R_Ongjoco "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Ron Location: BayArea/SanDiego Watch: AP Posts: 427	Thanks Kevin and cdnyc81 for the info!

24 January 2013, 12:26 PM	#23
cdnyc "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Cory Location: NY Posts: 681	And visually perhaps the most obvious distinction is that Jumbos don't have a seconds hand, whereas the 15300/15400s do have a seconds hand (a function of the 2121 caliber movement vs the 3120 movement). There are a number of other less obvious differences, including the one I mentioned above which had me kind of excited -- the Jumbo seems to wear a little wider because of its thinness. appreciate your feedback on that Hal. hoping to know if others find this to be as noticeable a difference as I do too.

24 January 2013, 02:24 PM	#26
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Awesome pics all!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)