ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 February 2013, 11:01 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
114060 - where is the love?
Hi All,
I have really enjoyed my short time here on the forum, learning - gaining appreciation for these watches. For me i think its a no date sub. and I thank everyone for the help and feedback along the way to that. My question is about the 114060. I see alot of posts and comments from people who are not really happy with it, but i would like to hear from some out there who love theirs. I completely get that the 14060m is the "classic" or at least the latest "classic"..and frankly I share that view, it does seem to have a more timeless profile...but the upgrades in quality of the new watch and bracelet are undeniable. Could it be that this new design is simply just too new, but will come to be accepted and loved as the new normal, or does anyone think its a flop, and Rolex will backtrack to smaller lugs and a rounder profile? I would like to fast forward 5 years and read the posts after this new case has been around a while. From what very little I know, it seems that Rolex is very slow and methodical to change, and rarely if ever reverse course, so I have to have faith that this is the new design standard and will become the preferred favorite over time when the next iteration presents. (Just a thought....would like to here comments from those who know know much more than me and have seen it all. This all comes down to which is right for me....complicating it is that a NIB 14060 is a bit hard to find, and if I do get the 114060, i dont to feel like i "settled" Probably overthinking it....this forum will do that to a newbie :) |
28 February 2013, 11:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
I think over time, the 114060 will become more accepted, not least of all as some of the older models become ever more rare and more expensive. It is a beautiful and very well constructed watch and easily does everything the older versions did, at no detriment.
|
28 February 2013, 11:46 PM | #3 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
thats well said..thank you
Quote:
|
|
28 February 2013, 11:52 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
having 14060m and love it for the old design, I would think the new model will do ok in sales for a watch w/o date.
|
1 March 2013, 12:04 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
It's an excellent watch. However when I would switch back and forth between my Sub Dates (SS&C) the C was just too flashy for me. I like that the SS flys under the radar.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
1 March 2013, 12:06 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Hmm
The posts I see are from folks who love the watch. What's wrong with it...besides the price? ;-) |
1 March 2013, 12:21 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
I think there will be always those that like the old, those that like the new, and the rest of the general population who probably couldn't tell the difference anyway.
The way I see it, the main deciding factor is how you feel about the 2 models. I would recommend getting the one you like best, regardless of whether it happens to be the latest model or whether the style may reflect the future "trend." I appreciate that getting a NIB 14060 may be more difficult via the AD route and if this is important to you, then the decision may have been made for you. Anyway, good luck with your choice and let us know what you end up getting. PS: I'm happy with my 116610! |
1 March 2013, 12:27 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
1 March 2013, 12:31 AM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
Thanks !
thanks
Quote:
|
|
1 March 2013, 12:36 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 23
|
Love mine!! The updates to it are substantial.
|
1 March 2013, 12:39 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Watch: 114060 ND SUB C
Posts: 230
|
I agree. I think I can speak with some authority as I have been wearing Rolex sport watches for over 35 years. I have had just about all of them including several Daytonas. The 114060 ND SUB C IMO is the best one I have ever owned. Looks fantastic ( no one is ever going to see the difference from the old style. I think that is nit picking) The flat crystal, ceramic bezel and that awesome bracelet does it for me. It is the most comfortable Rolex sport watch I have owned. As I said in a previous post, if I want to know the date I will look at my cell phone. I love this watch.
|
1 March 2013, 12:52 AM | #12 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
a agree and I appreciate your saying it..as I am leaning heavily toward this watch, and its a big deal purchase for me, i dont plan to own a ton of them.
However as someone with no authority, but is attuned into this subject..so I am scouring the comments trying to absorb and learn abit, there is a good amount of negative sentiment -- Quote:
Quote:
|
||
1 March 2013, 01:02 AM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,120
|
Seabreeze,
Still undecided I see. I wish you luck with the decision, as you are finding out it won't be an easy one. Once you do decide though... don't look back!! I'm sure it won't be long until you post your first pictures of your new baby.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
1 March 2013, 01:18 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
|
Get the new one...they're both beautiful, but the new one is more comfortable on the wrist, and the bracelet is terrific.
|
1 March 2013, 01:28 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Watch: 126610LN Finally!
Posts: 408
|
I would get the new one if cost was not an issue
They upgraded it for a reason Its a better watch functionally and this is a tool watch |
1 March 2013, 01:37 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: ATL
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 45
|
The ceramic sub is very nice. I also enjoy the blue lume over the green...even though our eyes are more sensitive to green than blue. I can also echo similar sentiments that I would have considered the 114060 if it weren't for price. I feel that it wasn't worth the substantial increase in price although the design is very beautiful and updated.
|
1 March 2013, 01:45 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,980
|
The new Sub C ND is a great update of a classic, but it lacks the smooth graceful lug/case lines of the original iconic Sub. Now, some people LOVE the new chunkier, bigger design, others don't. I'm a little more old-school and I flipped my Sub C ND because I couldn't get used to those fat lugs. Still, I'll probably end up with another one at some point because it's still beautiful.
|
1 March 2013, 02:54 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1,515
|
I've not read a bad word about it. I could read a scathing opinion on it from a leading watch expert and I wouldn't care. I love mine and it's not going anywhere.
|
1 March 2013, 06:52 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mass/Vegas/disney
Watch: Hulk,114060,14060
Posts: 929
|
I've had many 14060s and a few 114060s and the 114060 is by far my favorite of the two,although I love both the 114060 just feels so much better cause its solid and sharper looking to me anyways.both are great though.
|
1 March 2013, 06:55 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
like many here I'm old school.
|
1 March 2013, 07:10 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
|
I bought a new 114060 last summer from the first Rolex AD I visited that had one in stock.
The changes from the previous model are significant and I especially appreciate the bracelet upgrades. I still appreciate the 14060M but the new 114060 is presently my daily wear Rolex. Other than the price, I don't what what is not to love about the no-date SubC! |
1 March 2013, 07:34 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
|
__________________
16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!" |
1 March 2013, 08:45 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 476
|
Get the 114060. It will be your first and maybe only Rolex for a while as you said, and as its just been released it starts its journey when you start yours.
I'd prefer to start with the latest evolution. When they change the design again 15-30 years from now you can be one of the guys pining for the old days of the now "classic thick lugs, classic flip lock bracelet, and classic ceramic bezel". |
1 March 2013, 08:48 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 476
|
*i meant "Glide-lock bracelet"
|
1 March 2013, 09:00 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
I have the date and see much love for the ND but get the C as the upgrades significantly improve the quality of the watch, otherwise get the Omega PO for extra value.
|
1 March 2013, 12:34 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Erich
Location: -5
Posts: 742
|
I love mine :) I think it's just great for any occasion.
I fully understand the classic sub (non ceramic, lug holes) has it's wide and loyal fanbase as well. |
1 March 2013, 12:42 PM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
This 114060 is freaking amazing. It's an incredible Sub and you would not be disappointed with it. It's my daily wearer, and the only other watch I'd consider letting go of for is the new Explorer II. However, this 114060 is an INCREDIBLE watch.
Like most have said, I hardly see a bad thing written/spoken about it. Ever. Mine joy-riding today! |
1 March 2013, 12:44 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 30
|
The 114060 is the true evolution of the 5513 though it should have been 42mm.
|
1 March 2013, 12:55 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Roland
Location: GMT -4:00 Today
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 874
|
Nothing negative to say about the 114060. This SUBMARINER is Brilliant!!
|
1 March 2013, 03:07 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nick
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 759
|
114060
The 114060 is powerful enough to keep the white gold Submariner off my wrist for close to a month. Just a little example of how much I enjoy this reference...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.