Wrist shots? Maybe it's just me

[Syed117]

Hey guys,

I'm not sure if this is a suggestion or my eyes and brain just not seeing what everyone else seems to see, but thought I would put it out there.

A lot of forum members ask for wrists shots to evaluate size and proportions of a watch. I've been browsing the forum for a few months now as I'm getting extremely close to getting my first Rolex, most likely a Sub date. I've seen countless pictures, but the size didn't register at all until I tried one on at an AD. Obviously the best thing to do is try before buying and I would never blindly buy a watch without trying it first. That being said, it was still a bit of a shock.

The problem is that everyone seems to post these extreme close ups in which the watch takes up the whole frame or a large part of it. While this is great for showing details and makes for a excellent picture, it doesn't give a good idea of the size and proportions because the extreme closeness. Even when I see wrist shots now, the sizes come across much larger than they actually are.

Everyone knows that the Sub is 40mm, but after seeing so many close up wrist shots, it seem so much smaller when I actually tried one on. My wrist is about 7.5 and the dozens of wrists shots made it seem significantly larger than it actually is and wears.

Not sure if anyone else feels the same way. Maybe it's just me because I'm new here and will adjust with time.

[HRV]

You'll get used to it, the more often you try some models on the better, of course having large wrists doesn't help here is my DSSD on my 8.66" wrist
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1362980820.447374.jpg
But having said that, you get used to smaller sizes, here is my vintage SUB
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1362980933.480034.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1362980993.977512.jpg



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[AK797]

Watches always look so much bigger online than in real life, esp the Daytona which can come as quite a shock when you first try it on. To get an idea of size I usually hold the watch on my wrist at the time up to the laptop and adjust the screen size so they are a similar size so I get an idea of how much dial detail can be really seen. But you have to go to an ADs of course.

[Andad]

I have the same problem.

Here is my 55mm Tudor pillowcase.

Welcome to the Forum Syed.

[Psmith]

This is exactly why it's so important to see/try in real life. The constant diet of large photos online can be very misleading, and lead to some unfortunate opinions being formed

[SeaDweller50]

That DSSD is a perfect fit on you Andrew.

[Bangel]

I agree, watches do tend to look smaller in real life compared to photos.

When I saw my first submariner "in the metal", I remember being surprised by how small the writing was on the dial. "Superlative chronometer officially certified" looked tiny compared to all the enlarged images I had seen.

[Cru Jones]

Originally Posted by Bangel

When I saw my first submariner "in the metal", I remember being surprised by how small the writing was on the dial. "Superlative chronometer officially certified" looked tiny compared to all the enlarged images I had seen.

And thank goodness for that!

[Bangel]

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

And thank goodness for that!

Amen! I should have said pleasantly surprised!

[Deego]

True!! In that case , i think u should try on the DSSD...ull like it better on ur wrist size

[LA_LEC]

Originally Posted by Psmith

This is exactly why it's so important to see/try in real life. The constant diet of large photos online can be very misleading, and lead to some unfortunate opinions being formed

Same thing I have experienced with porn!

[zhiunit]

if sub is too small, get the DSSD.....simple as that

[superdog]

Originally Posted by LA_LEC

Same thing I have experienced with porn!

[Psmith]

Originally Posted by LA_LEC

Same thing I have experienced with porn!

Too funny

Pics or it didn't happen!

[kilyung]

"Try before you buy" is a very important motto.

[rolex75216]

Good post. I have noticed the same thing. It is not easy to please all wrists, but I do wish the sub was in the 42mm range. I tried on a 43mm watch (non Rolex) and it felt like the perfect size. After you tried on the sub at your local AD, has it changed your mind one way or the other in terms of moving forward with a purchase?

[Stuxnet]

Most of us own the Sub or DSSD or other sports watches so we know exactly how big they are. As a small wristed person the wrist shots usually have me going "that's a big wrist, must be a big fella there". Sometimes I imagine the poster must be 6'8" and 300lbs.

[Brandon(phila)]

wow your the first person I have seen make the DSSD look like a ladies datejust...That's awesome 8.66 wrist. :)

To the OP, I totally agree ...but try the watch on and stand back a few feet and look in the mirror, I can assure you that the 40mm doesn't look too small from a distance. Especially the new Subs with the thicker lugs. I usually make the sales person try it on too, gives you perspective from different angels.
...but if you think too small...step up to the DSSD. I did and love it much more that the sub.

[troelsit]

I think the 116610 looks a lit heavier on the wrist compared to 16610 - obviously due to the newer design.
I personally thinks it's a shame - but it's all about personal style.

[HRV]

Originally Posted by RolexplorerII

That DSSD is a perfect fit on you Andrew.

Thanks

[HRV]

Originally Posted by Brandon(phila)

wow your the first person I have seen make the DSSD look like a ladies datejust...That's awesome 8.66 wrist. :)

[tedscott3]

So trying it on in person gave you a better perspective to it's size? Imagine that. Everything on the internet from pictures to reviews is just a starting point.

[Angrypuppy]

I went through the same thing when trying to decide between a DD and a DDII. After looking at tons of pictures on this forum I was fairly certain I wanted a DDII. After a trip to an AD I realized the 36mm was the way for me to go. When I look at pics I took at the AD the 36mm looks too small, but it was great.

[anothernewphone]

A lot of the older crowd will say "40mm is a big watch," when the younger crowd wishes there was a 42mm Sub. More than anything, always make sure you try on a watch before you buy it. Some might look great in photos, but then just not fit properly on your wrist.

I was absolutely in love with the Omega Planet Ocean 8500, but when I tried one one, it was just far too tall for me. I didn't get that sense from any of the photos, and I would have lost a good amount of money if I bought one before checking them out in person.

[ecsub44]

Originally Posted by directioneng

I have the same problem.

Here is my 55mm Tudor pillowcase.

Welcome to the Forum Syed.

Is that really 55mm? And what size are your wrists??

That's a spectabulous watch!

[robie]

Remember that always watches on photos look larger than they really are so the best thing to do is to try.

[Syed117]

Definitely didn't expect this many responses since yesterday, but everyone is right. Trying the sub on for the first time really changed my perspective on how it would look and feel on my wrist.

I absolutely understand people liking the 40mm, and it's not that I dislike it, it's just that it looks a bit small on my wrist. I do like the DSSD and maybe that's an option, but I've always loved the look of the Sub. I know it's been changed a bit over the years, but it's just so appealing. Decisions, decisions.

HRV, that's exactly what I'm talking about. As soon as you pull back the camera, the proportions are completely different. That DSSD looks fantastic on your wrist.

[steveclocks]

do go for the DSSD if you have larger wrists, you won't regret it!

[floater156]

I agree. I'm not a big fan of wristshots. I must prefer shots from a distance so you can see how the watch truly wears on a person.