ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Thani · 25 December 2007, 06:43 AM

What do you guys think is better/nicer??

a sub with date or no date??

Dan Pierce · 25 December 2007, 06:48 AM

Date, love the cyclops.

dP

f16570 · 25 December 2007, 06:48 AM

The Cyclops is part of Rolex.

f

blueface · 25 December 2007, 06:51 AM

Sorry, I can't vote. I'm still up in the air over this one, been trying to decied this for months which one for my next watch.

mike · 25 December 2007, 06:52 AM

If I had one watch it would have a date. Just so convenient.

steel4me · 25 December 2007, 06:59 AM

I believe the resale value is tremendous with the date. Even though the same watches, the diff in desirability is tremendous ... looks like most want the date.....

Thani · 25 December 2007, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueface

Sorry, I can't vote. I'm still up in the air over this one, been trying to decied this for months which one for my next watch.

same here. i really wanna get one for my next watch ( couple of months ) but cant really decide..

Tools · 25 December 2007, 07:11 AM

Date is convenient.....

Depends on your priorities in life..

Thani · 25 December 2007, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steel4me

I believe the resale value is tremendous with the date. Even though the same watches, the diff in desirability is tremendous ... looks like most want the date.....

ya i know what you mean, but i wont have any intentions of selling it..

bgriz · 25 December 2007, 07:12 AM

Date

Thani · 25 December 2007, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

Date is convenient.....

Depends on your priorities in life..

tools, date is important and the sub is a great everyday watch, but i have 3 watches with dates and 2 without..

really cant decide, i love the one with no date because it has a much more classic look to it.. but on the other hand like u said the date is convenient

steel4me · 25 December 2007, 07:14 AM

by the way, can someone tell me the MSRP price difference between the date and no-date?

thanks

Alex Stylianou · 25 December 2007, 07:32 AM

Date !!!

Mrdi · 25 December 2007, 07:44 AM

both
Unless the date is quick change the date is a chore.
If you wear it everyday then date is OK because you don't need to change it.
If you wear that Rolex once or twice a week/month, then the date needs changed everytime.
CHORE

steel4me · 25 December 2007, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steel4me

by the way, can someone tell me the MSRP price difference between the date and no-date?

thanks

I got the answer to my q above, from the FAQ. the price diff between the two is $725, MSRP.

Thani · 25 December 2007, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steel4me

I got the answer to my q above, from the FAQ. the price diff between the two is $725, MSRP.

glad u posted that.. thanks

Thani · 25 December 2007, 08:44 AM

this is getting very hard to decide... posts are 10 to 11 now..

hmmmmmmmm

seantk · 25 December 2007, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thani

What do you guys think is better/nicer??

a sub with date or no date??

I personally love the cyclops on the submariner date. It is amazing how much magnification it has!

Sean

Goodwatch · 25 December 2007, 08:47 AM

If the non date is a chronometer movement.... I vote non date, very clean, very basic.

steel4me · 25 December 2007, 08:49 AM

I looked at one without a date but its dial looked very blank. It is nice to have that writing on it "certified chronometer" which is missing on the no-date sub.

But I am thinking of buying it soon. I have the date SS sub and a seadweller, so I want to complete the sports series with this sub-nodate model .....

gmt 16750 · 25 December 2007, 09:06 AM

For me personally, a watch has to have a date.

kcmo · 25 December 2007, 10:03 AM

I've always loved the DATE model which is what I went for. Love that cyclops. But the no date is a classic too. You can't go wrong either way!

frostie · 25 December 2007, 10:42 AM

No date since the SS sub date is really common out there

roadcarver · 25 December 2007, 12:25 PM

I would go for the sub date since I need a date complication in all my watches. Love the 14060, but just missing the date - used to have the 14060 - didn't like the cyclops so I replaced it with the Sea-Dweller. I know in the world of pocket technologies, they all tell you the date, but I'm sooo used to looking at my watch for the date.

Tallboy · 25 December 2007, 12:27 PM

I'm not a cyclops fan, I think it looks "added-on". If I had to have a date on my watch, I would go SD, or have the crystal replaced with a non-cyclops.

FlyingMoose · 25 December 2007, 12:38 PM

I did a resale comparison which I posted in another thread, based on eBay auctions...

Anyway, the Date and ND subs depreciate almost exactly the same amount, percentage wise. So, this isn't really much of an issue.

SSD · 25 December 2007, 12:45 PM

I've always had a date feature on all my watches, so its a learned dependency with me. But I like the cyclops' appearance, too!

DS/B MINI S · 25 December 2007, 12:53 PM

They both look great, but I'll have to cast my vote for the date.

Paulie · 25 December 2007, 01:01 PM

I voted non-date as well. Its just so clean and classic a look with a elegance of symmetry.

Hicks · 25 December 2007, 11:17 PM

Date for me. I just got to have a date on my watch. Apart from that, I prefer the SELs and the better constructed diver extension on the Sub Date. However, I do really appreciate the clean, classic look of the no date sub. The non-COSC that is.

View Poll Results: Date or no date?
Date	109	57.37%
No Date	81	42.63%
Voters: 190. You may not vote on this poll

25 December 2007, 06:43 AM	#1
Thani Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Thani Location: Dubai UAE Watch: Milgauss 116400 GV Posts: 2,082	date or no date? sub What do you guys think is better/nicer?? a sub with date or no date??

25 December 2007, 06:48 AM	#2
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,175	Date, love the cyclops. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

25 December 2007, 06:51 AM	#4
blueface "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Dave Location: USA Watch: DJ, DD, SUB Posts: 487	Sorry, I can't vote. I'm still up in the air over this one, been trying to decied this for months which one for my next watch. __________________ TT Datejust 16233 (T) SOLD YG Daydate 11833 (K SS Sub Date 16610 (M). SOLD TT Blue Sub Date 116613LB (Random, 2018?)

25 December 2007, 07:11 AM	#8
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,494	Date is convenient..... Depends on your priorities in life.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

25 December 2007, 06:48 AM	#3
f16570 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: F Location: Scotland Watch: Exp II White Face Posts: 4,272	The Cyclops is part of Rolex. f

25 December 2007, 06:52 AM	#5
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	If I had one watch it would have a date. Just so convenient.

25 December 2007, 06:59 AM	#6
steel4me Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: SteelMan Location: Somewhere Posts: 719	I believe the resale value is tremendous with the date. Even though the same watches, the diff in desirability is tremendous ... looks like most want the date.....

25 December 2007, 07:12 AM	#10
bgriz 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Brian Location: Chicagoland Watch: ing the markets Posts: 2,194	Date

25 December 2007, 07:14 AM	#12
steel4me Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: SteelMan Location: Somewhere Posts: 719	by the way, can someone tell me the MSRP price difference between the date and no-date? thanks

25 December 2007, 07:32 AM	#13
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	Date !!!

25 December 2007, 07:44 AM	#14
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	both Unless the date is quick change the date is a chore. If you wear it everyday then date is OK because you don't need to change it. If you wear that Rolex once or twice a week/month, then the date needs changed everytime. CHORE

25 December 2007, 08:44 AM	#17
Thani Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Thani Location: Dubai UAE Watch: Milgauss 116400 GV Posts: 2,082	this is getting very hard to decide... posts are 10 to 11 now.. hmmmmmmmm

25 December 2007, 08:47 AM	#19
Goodwatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Real Name: Frans ® Location: Rotterdam Watch: the sunrise... Posts: 10,230	If the non date is a chronometer movement.... I vote non date, very clean, very basic. __________________ Member# 127

25 December 2007, 08:49 AM	#20
steel4me Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: SteelMan Location: Somewhere Posts: 719	I looked at one without a date but its dial looked very blank. It is nice to have that writing on it "certified chronometer" which is missing on the no-date sub. But I am thinking of buying it soon. I have the date SS sub and a seadweller, so I want to complete the sports series with this sub-nodate model .....

25 December 2007, 09:06 AM	#21
gmt 16750 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Neil Location: Borders, Scotland Watch: what your doing. Posts: 970	For me personally, a watch has to have a date. __________________

25 December 2007, 10:03 AM	#22
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	I've always loved the DATE model which is what I went for. Love that cyclops. But the no date is a classic too. You can't go wrong either way!

25 December 2007, 10:42 AM	#23
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	No date since the SS sub date is really common out there

25 December 2007, 12:25 PM	#24
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	I would go for the sub date since I need a date complication in all my watches. Love the 14060, but just missing the date - used to have the 14060 - didn't like the cyclops so I replaced it with the Sea-Dweller. I know in the world of pocket technologies, they all tell you the date, but I'm sooo used to looking at my watch for the date. __________________ I'm just a cook...

25 December 2007, 12:27 PM	#25
Tallboy Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Chuck Location: Venice, Florida Watch: 07 Air King Posts: 125	I'm not a cyclops fan, I think it looks "added-on". If I had to have a date on my watch, I would go SD, or have the crystal replaced with a non-cyclops.

25 December 2007, 12:38 PM	#26
FlyingMoose "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: New York, USA Posts: 502	I did a resale comparison which I posted in another thread, based on eBay auctions... Anyway, the Date and ND subs depreciate almost exactly the same amount, percentage wise. So, this isn't really much of an issue.

25 December 2007, 12:45 PM	#27
SSD "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jamie Location: Georgia Watch: Stainless Sub Date Posts: 3,023	I've always had a date feature on all my watches, so its a learned dependency with me. But I like the cyclops' appearance, too! __________________ SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464

25 December 2007, 12:53 PM	#28
DS/B MINI S "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Mike Location: Charlotte NC Watch: SD & Exp II Posts: 961	They both look great, but I'll have to cast my vote for the date. __________________ 16600 Sea-Dweller 16570 Explorer II (White Dial)

25 December 2007, 01:01 PM	#29
Paulie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Chicagoland Watch: GMTII and OP! Posts: 1,272	I voted non-date as well. Its just so clean and classic a look with a elegance of symmetry. __________________

25 December 2007, 11:17 PM	#30
Hicks Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Netherlands Watch: Omega 2221.80 Posts: 61	Date for me. I just got to have a date on my watch. Apart from that, I prefer the SELs and the better constructed diver extension on the Sub Date. However, I do really appreciate the clean, classic look of the no date sub. The non-COSC that is.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)