ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 April 2013, 09:40 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SE Fla, Munich
Posts: 45
|
6605 I consider buying - what's your Opinion?
Just found this on ebay and spoke to the seller – Hilal Saad (sp?) – on the phone and per ebay ratings (100%) he seems upfront enough and has this watch for sale:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Role...item589ec22301 I may consider exchanging the dial for a silver one. But in any case I'd be very interested to hear my compatriots' opinion on it and if you have any experience with this seller. TIA! |
19 April 2013, 11:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
It looks pretty good to me, but I don't have any experience with eBay sellers sorry. The price is quite reasonable too I think.
One question though, why would you consider swapping the dial for the silver one? I think it looks good as is. IMHO.
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
19 April 2013, 12:01 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: france
Posts: 796
|
Overpolished lugs.... I would not buy it.
|
19 April 2013, 08:40 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SE Fla, Munich
Posts: 45
|
Shade - just like the contrast better; my stolen 1601 had that combo and I just happen to love it. Thanks for your input!
michel33 - I'm not knowledgeable enough, so I wonder: why would overpolished lugs be a reason not to buy a watch? Is that a problem per se, or an indicator for other problems, or both? Thanks! |
20 April 2013, 12:42 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
Frankly, I'd stay away from these mid-late '50s Datejusts because of the potential serious problems arising from servicing the cal. 1065 movements. Can be a real headache (especially if previous watchmakers have botched repairs), and parts are not readily available.
On this particular one, the dial is a later service replacement, and I agree that the lugs appear over-polished.
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
21 April 2013, 12:47 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: SE Fla, Munich
Posts: 45
|
Adam - sigh; you had to sink it, did you?
LOL Many thanks for your comment and the explanation; I'll refrain from this one and 1065 movements then. Valuable info, much appreciated. (Seller told me it's a replacement dial btw; I thought so too because the stick markers came around only later as far as I know.) |
21 April 2013, 01:10 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
I only speak from experience -- best to stick with the later cal. 1560/1570 movements, 1959 and later. Unless it's been serviced and fully guaranteed...
Since it's a later dial anyway, the pleasure of owning a 6605 is much diminished in this case anyway (those original "SWISS" dials can be lovely).
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
21 April 2013, 03:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
21 April 2013, 04:49 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,984
|
Agree with the above comments. Those lugs are way too thin now from polishing, and that dial is refinished, as the ad says. Also, in general, I stay away from watches that have mismatched accessories, such as that booklet and box that are not period-correct for this model. That's not a good sign, almost as if the seller is trying to trick potential buyers. Good luck in your search!
|
Tags |
6605 datejust |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.