ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Attila · 12 January 2008, 05:05 PM

Hello friends!

I am been meaning to post these pictures for a long while, but the watch had been at Rolex Australia having it's five year check up.

This watch actually belongs to my father and he has had it for close to 30 years. Its amazing to see the difference between the 1016 and my 116710, for example the 'ticking' is distinctly different and obvious why, the weight is about 50 grams different, the look is very different (I love the look of both!).

Anyway enjoy these very crude pictures!

I must apologise for the poor quality photographs, I must clean the lense of my camera and remove the photographer's reflections for future postings!

Jedi · 12 January 2008, 06:45 PM

Great photos of a fantastic vintage piece in great condition!

Congratulations.

Please post some comparison shots!!

Lol-x · 12 January 2008, 07:01 PM

One of my favorite watches in every way.

BiG JeEzY · 12 January 2008, 07:07 PM

The design is simple and elegant, yet classic and flawless...

Attila · 12 January 2008, 07:16 PM

Thank you all for your comments, it is indeed a timeless excuse the pun timepiece!

This is the watch that started me with my fascination of watches.

I will post some pictures of the whole collection after the battery charges on my camera (it has just died from overuse today with a trip to Lake Mountain doing some bush walking).

mike · 12 January 2008, 07:38 PM

Lovely.

Classic watch and great photos.

jac67 · 12 January 2008, 09:29 PM

Very nice.

Thanks for posting.

John.

SPACE-DWELLER · 12 January 2008, 09:35 PM

Wow! That is one gorgeous timepiece!

Congrats!

Here's an interesting variation of the 1016:

Attila · 12 January 2008, 10:48 PM

Thanks for the comments.

Bo, thanks for sharing the picture, I have learnt something new today.

cbird · 13 January 2008, 03:31 AM

Thank you for the pictures. You say there is a 50g weight difference? Which is heavier?

Tools · 13 January 2008, 03:35 AM

Great shots

That 3. 6. 9. dial is a classic...Rolex really hit the nail on the head with that one...

Easily as recognizible as the cyclops, and just as classic..

Attila · 13 January 2008, 11:04 AM

My GMT IIc is 148 grams, the Explorer is 98 grams :o

I have a question about the accuracy of vintage watches though, this watch was serviced just before Christmas from RCS, however it is gaining 7 minutes in 4 days, does anyone else have a vintage time piece that gains this amount of time?

I will be taking it back to Rolex to re adjust it, but I have heard that heat can play a problem with regulating, is this true?

Lol-x · 13 January 2008, 01:38 PM

I have the same watch and it is always running to COSC specifications.

Jedi · 13 January 2008, 04:08 PM

Thanks for the pics!

The 1016 is quickly becoming a grail for me. It would make the perfect entry into Vintage land...

Trurolexer · 13 January 2008, 06:55 PM

Congrats with BEAUTIFUL classic Explorer!!! One of a kind Rolex!!!

Attila · 13 January 2008, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lol-x

I have the same watch and it is always running to COSC specifications.

Interesting you say that Steve, I will have to return it to Rolex again.

The reason I was asking is because I thought that maybe with older watches the percentage of accuracy would diminish...

Thanks for your comments :).

mike · 13 January 2008, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Attila

My GMT IIc is 148 grams, the Explorer is 98 grams :o

I have a question about the accuracy of vintage watches though, this watch was serviced just before Christmas from RCS, however it is gaining 7 minutes in 4 days, does anyone else have a vintage time piece that gains this amount of time?

I will be taking it back to Rolex to re adjust it, but I have heard that heat can play a problem with regulating, is this true?

My worst vintage is +4 sec. a day. Several are from -1 to +2.

Attila · 13 January 2008, 10:39 PM

Thank you, Mike.

Jerry B · 13 January 2008, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY

The design is simple and elegant, yet classic and flawless...

Couldn't say any better

Alcan · 14 January 2008, 12:20 AM

Attila, looks like the RSC brought that EXP back to superb condition.

vukotab · 14 January 2008, 01:21 AM

I love that watch!Wear it wih pride and in a good health!

Attila · 14 January 2008, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alcan

Attila, looks like the RSC brought that EXP back to superb condition.

Thank you, Al, I must say that it is kept in very good condition, mainly its the crystal that needs to be buffed.

Thankyou.

Wingshooter · 26 April 2008, 06:44 AM

That is the exact Rolex I am looking for as my first Rolex. If anyone can help me find one like it I would appreciate it very much. I am sifting thorugh Ebay somewhat but that just makes me very nervous.

thanks

OYSTERMANN · 26 April 2008, 07:39 AM

Attila, what great pictures of a much loved timepiece - they're really good

.

I'm sure we're all waiting for some more, when your batteries are charged

.

Thanks for showing them to us

.

Ursa Major · 26 April 2008, 07:47 AM

Thanks, Attila. I have a thing for the Explorer; it's the purest and least ostentatious of the sport watches. Someday I'll have a 1016, but buying a vintage one can't compare to having one in the family for so many years.

Beef · 26 April 2008, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Attila

My GMT IIc is 148 grams, the Explorer is 98 grams :o

I have a question about the accuracy of vintage watches though, this watch was serviced just before Christmas from RCS, however it is gaining 7 minutes in 4 days, does anyone else have a vintage time piece that gains this amount of time?

I will be taking it back to Rolex to re adjust it, but I have heard that heat can play a problem with regulating, is this true?

I would definitely take it back. That is totally unacceptable. I have the hacking and non-hacking version and they are quite accurate (don't gain or lose noticably, I rarely check.) Thanks for pics, smudges and all.

Marrk · 26 April 2008, 08:01 AM

Sometimes, when I completely take leave of my senses and start to think I can afford it, my mind veers towards the Explorer 36mm. It's lovely, even to a hardened 5513 guy like me.

$4925.00. Wow.

A "good deal" for a new Explorer from an AD would be . . . ?

oneillba · 26 April 2008, 08:02 AM

Very nice, a classic. Thank you for sharing it with us.

Beef · 26 April 2008, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wingshooter

That is the exact Rolex I am looking for as my first Rolex. If anyone can help me find one like it I would appreciate it very much. I am sifting thorugh Ebay somewhat but that just makes me very nervous.

thanks

It should as they are heavily counterfeited out of some parts of Asia. Try some established on-line vintage dealers like www.wannabuyawatch.com and www.bgrayjewelers.com and www.artoftime.com. They frequently have them with a money back guarantee. Not the cheapest, but authentic.

Attila · 26 April 2008, 02:09 PM

Here are some pictures of the 1016 with the 116710, I must say the GMT looks HUGE in comparison!

-

12 January 2008, 05:05 PM	#1
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	Pictures of Rolex 1016 Explorer Hello friends! I am been meaning to post these pictures for a long while, but the watch had been at Rolex Australia having it's five year check up. This watch actually belongs to my father and he has had it for close to 30 years. Its amazing to see the difference between the 1016 and my 116710, for example the 'ticking' is distinctly different and obvious why, the weight is about 50 grams different, the look is very different (I love the look of both!). Anyway enjoy these very crude pictures! I must apologise for the poor quality photographs, I must clean the lense of my camera and remove the photographer's reflections for future postings!

12 January 2008, 07:07 PM	#4
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	The design is simple and elegant, yet classic and flawless... __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

12 January 2008, 09:35 PM	#8
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Wow! That is one gorgeous timepiece! Congrats! Here's an interesting variation of the 1016: __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

13 January 2008, 03:35 AM	#11
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,496	Great shots That 3. 6. 9. dial is a classic...Rolex really hit the nail on the head with that one... Easily as recognizible as the cyclops, and just as classic.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

14 January 2008, 12:20 AM	#20
Alcan 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Al Location: Way Up North Watch: your P's & Q's Posts: 10,473	Attila, looks like the RSC brought that EXP back to superb condition. __________________ Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!

12 January 2008, 06:45 PM	#2
Jedi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Lee Location: Malaysia Watch: 16750 Posts: 2,534	Great photos of a fantastic vintage piece in great condition! Congratulations. Please post some comparison shots!!

12 January 2008, 07:01 PM	#3
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,562	One of my favorite watches in every way.

12 January 2008, 07:16 PM	#5
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	Thank you all for your comments, it is indeed a timeless excuse the pun timepiece! This is the watch that started me with my fascination of watches. I will post some pictures of the whole collection after the battery charges on my camera (it has just died from overuse today with a trip to Lake Mountain doing some bush walking).

12 January 2008, 07:38 PM	#6
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Lovely. Classic watch and great photos.

12 January 2008, 09:29 PM	#7
jac67 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: John Location: Australia Watch: Me Posts: 1,950	Very nice. Thanks for posting. John.

12 January 2008, 10:48 PM	#9
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	Thanks for the comments. Bo, thanks for sharing the picture, I have learnt something new today.

13 January 2008, 03:31 AM	#10
cbird "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Illinois Posts: 34	Thank you for the pictures. You say there is a 50g weight difference? Which is heavier?

13 January 2008, 11:04 AM	#12
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	My GMT IIc is 148 grams, the Explorer is 98 grams :o I have a question about the accuracy of vintage watches though, this watch was serviced just before Christmas from RCS, however it is gaining 7 minutes in 4 days, does anyone else have a vintage time piece that gains this amount of time? I will be taking it back to Rolex to re adjust it, but I have heard that heat can play a problem with regulating, is this true?

13 January 2008, 01:38 PM	#13
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,562	I have the same watch and it is always running to COSC specifications.

13 January 2008, 04:08 PM	#14
Jedi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Lee Location: Malaysia Watch: 16750 Posts: 2,534	Thanks for the pics! The 1016 is quickly becoming a grail for me. It would make the perfect entry into Vintage land...

13 January 2008, 06:55 PM	#15
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Congrats with BEAUTIFUL classic Explorer!!! One of a kind Rolex!!!

13 January 2008, 10:39 PM	#18
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	Thank you, Mike.

14 January 2008, 01:21 AM	#21
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	I love that watch!Wear it wih pride and in a good health!

26 April 2008, 06:44 AM	#23
Wingshooter Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: USA Posts: 146	That is the exact Rolex I am looking for as my first Rolex. If anyone can help me find one like it I would appreciate it very much. I am sifting thorugh Ebay somewhat but that just makes me very nervous. thanks

26 April 2008, 07:39 AM	#24
OYSTERMANN "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Neil Location: West Midlands UK Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub Posts: 7,063	Attila, what great pictures of a much loved timepiece - they're really good. I'm sure we're all waiting for some more, when your batteries are charged. Thanks for showing them to us. __________________ Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014

26 April 2008, 07:47 AM	#25
Ursa Major "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Dave Location: Park City, Utah Watch: TT Sub Posts: 248	Thanks, Attila. I have a thing for the Explorer; it's the purest and least ostentatious of the sport watches. Someday I'll have a 1016, but buying a vintage one can't compare to having one in the family for so many years. __________________ Rolex Explorer II - White Rolex Sub TT 16613 - Blue

26 April 2008, 08:01 AM	#27
Marrk "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Mark Location: Los Angeles Watch: 5513 Posts: 2,192	Sometimes, when I completely take leave of my senses and start to think I can afford it, my mind veers towards the Explorer 36mm. It's lovely, even to a hardened 5513 guy like me. $4925.00. Wow. A "good deal" for a new Explorer from an AD would be . . . ?

26 April 2008, 08:02 AM	#28
oneillba "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Brian Location: Hamilton, MI USA Watch: My beloved TT DJ Posts: 3,831	Very nice, a classic. Thank you for sharing it with us. __________________ My Trusty TT DJ

26 April 2008, 02:09 PM	#30
Attila Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Attila Location: VIC AUS Watch: GMT/Explorer/Sptfr Posts: 320	Here are some pictures of the 1016 with the 116710, I must say the GMT looks HUGE in comparison! -

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)